Morris’s research while affiliated with University of Delaware and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (8)


Timely and Useful Data to Improve Classroom Instruction
  • Article

July 2020

·

187 Reads

·

6 Citations

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

·

Morris

·

Hohensee

·

[...]

·

Hiebert




So What? Justifying Conclusions and Interpretations of Data

November 2019

·

212 Reads

·

8 Citations

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Although often asked tactfully, a frequent question posed to authors by JRME reviewers is “So what?” Through this simple and well-known question, reviewers are asking: What difference do your findings make? How do your results advance the field? “So what?” is the most basic of questions, often perceived by novice researchers as the most difficult question to answer. Indeed, addressing the “so what” question continues to challenge even experienced researchers. All researchers wrestle with articulating a convincing argument about the importance of their own work. When we try to shape this argument, it can be easy to fall into the trap of making claims about the implications of our findings that reach beyond the data.


Choosing and Justifying Robust Methods for Educational Research

July 2019

·

217 Reads

·

12 Citations

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

In our recent editorials (Cai et al., 2019a, 2019b), we discussed the important roles that research questions and theoretical frameworks play in conceptualizing, carrying out, and reporting mathematics education research. In this editorial, we discuss the methodological choices that arise when one has articulated research questions and constructed at least a rudimentary theoretical framework. Just as the researcher must justify the significance of research questions and the appropriateness of the theoretical framework, we argue that the researcher must thoroughly describe and justify the selection of methods. Indeed, the research questions and the theoretical framework should drive the choice of methods (and not the reverse). In other words, a sufficiently well-specified set of research questions and theoretical framework establish the parameters within which the most productive methods will be selected and developed.


Theoretical Framing as Justifying

May 2019

·

142 Reads

·

30 Citations

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

In our March editorial (Cai et al., 2019), we discussed the nature of significant research questions in mathematics education. We asserted that the choice of a suitable theoretical framework is critical to establishing the significance of a research question. In this editorial, we continue our series on high-quality research in mathematics education by elaborating on how a well-constructed theoretical framework strengthens a research study and the reporting of research for publication. In particular, we describe how the theoretical framework provides a connecting thread that ties together all of the parts of a research report into a coherent whole. Specifically, the theoretical framework should help (a) make the case for the purpose of a study and shape the literature review; (b) justify the study design and methods; and (c) focus and guide the reporting, interpretation, and discussion of results and their implications.


Posing Significant Research Questions

March 2019

·

308 Reads

·

31 Citations

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

In 2002, the National Research Council (NRC) released Scientific Research in Education , a report that proposed six principles to serve as guidelines for all scientific inquiry in education. The first of these principles was to “pose significant questions that can be investigated empirically” (p. 3). The report argued that the significance of a question could be established on a foundation of existing theoretical, methodological, and empirical work. However, it is not always clear what counts as a significant question in educational research or where such questions come from. Moreover, our analysis of the reviews for manuscripts submitted to JRME ¹ suggests that some practical, specific guidance could help researchers develop a significant question or make the case for the significance of a research question when preparing reports of research for publication.

Citations (8)


... 13 How do we, as mathematics teacher educators, identify useful and research-based practices for meeting this goal? In a series of recent editorials, Cai and colleagues discussed several overarching goals for the field of mathematics education that included calls for (a) implementing research pathways that connect theory and practice (Cai et al., 2019) and (b) identifying, valuing, and sharing professional knowledge for teaching (Cai et al., 2020a). In our study, we aimed to translate FA research findings into actionable recommendations for mathematics teacher educators to support secondary mathematics teachers' FA practices. ...

Reference:

The Power of an Opening Problem: A Pathway for Mathematics Teachers to Explore Formative Assessment
Timely and Useful Data to Improve Classroom Instruction
  • Citing Article
  • July 2020

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

... Previous studies also highlight the nuanced relation between technology integration and learning outcomes, especially on how digital tools like GeoGebra, interactive whiteboards and tablets may enhance conventional teaching methods (De Vita et al., 2018;Duijzer et al., 2019;Günster & Weigand, 2020). The transition from laboratory settings to classroom environments amplifies these complexities, revealing variations in implementation effectiveness due to factors such as scaling for larger groups, accommodating diverse student abilities, and local contextual dynamics (Alberto et al., 2022;Cai et al., 2020;Kosmas & Zaphiris, 2023). Empirical evidence suggests that the success of technology-enhanced learning environments depends on how well these variables are managed. ...

Working Across Contexts: Scaling Up or Replicating With Variations?
  • Citing Article
  • May 2020

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

... Teachers are the key to the success of any educational system (Lee, 2014). Alongside their busy day-to-day work, they are also required to remain updated in the mathematical content presented in often vague and overloaded curriculum schedules (Cai et al., 2020); consistently upgrade their mathematical knowledge, teaching approach and practices; and create and implement lesson plans (LPs) and teaching resources to improve their students' learning opportunities (Treacy et al., 2020). To accomplish this, teachers must be given appropriate autonomy and, more specifically, opportunities to collaborate with their colleagues (Lindqvist et al., 2020;OECD, 2011;Vangrieken & Kyndt, 2020), especially by sharing knowledge through joint lesson planning (Cai et al., 2020;Owen, 2015) or by participating in communities where experienced and novice teachers collaborate to promote professional capital (Cai et al., 2020;Li & Lu, 2024). ...

Addressing the Problem of Always Starting Over: Identifying, Valuing, and Sharing Professional Knowledge for Teaching
  • Citing Article
  • March 2020

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

... Researchers argued that, for educational research significantly to impact classroom teaching and drive systemic improvement, teachers must develop a robust professional knowledge base (Cai et al., 2018, Cai et al., 2020Hiebert & Morris, 2012;Morris & Hiebert, 2009). This knowledge base is often embedded within artifacts such as sharable and revisable teaching cases (Cai et al., 2023) or instructional products (Morris & Hiebert, 2011). ...

Maximizing the Quality of Learning Opportunities for Every Student
  • Citing Article
  • January 2020

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

... After assessing high stakes grant applications, research proposals for higher degree research students, and reviewing and writing manuscripts for publication over many years, I often find myself asking "So what?" and wondered why it challenges so many of us to clearly articulate the significance of our research. According to Cai et al. (2019b) about one-third of manuscripts rejected for publication in the Journal of Research in Mathematics Education (JRME) received feedback from reviewers that "So what?" had not been adequately addressed despite being a fundamental aspect of doing and reporting research. In keeping with the conference theme, Surfing the waves of mathematics education, I decided to take a 'deep dive' into the significance of mathematics education research. ...

So What? Justifying Conclusions and Interpretations of Data
  • Citing Article
  • November 2019

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

... yo misma tomé sus referencias para documentar la redacción de esta editorial y también las utilicé como guía para buscar en nuestra disciplina discusiones cercanas. Encontré un capítulo interesante de Sandra Crespo y Jinfa Cai (2019) donde proponen la escritura como una comunicación con los revisores, poniendo atención en los criterios de coherencia, fundamentación de las afirmaciones y la contribución de la investigación, siendo estos los que más resaltan en las evaluaciones de los revisores; también de Sandra Crespo (2016), como editora de la Mathematics Teacher Educator, encontré una interesante editorial donde habla de la retroalimentación de la revisión como proceso formativo, para repensar la forma en que leemos y damos retroalimentación a los manuscritos de nuestros pares; y, finalmente, la serie de editoriales del Journal for Research in Mathematics Education en 2019, sobre la escritura científica tomando en cuenta los procesos de revisión por pares que se han vivido en la revista en un lapso considerable (Cai et al, 2019a(Cai et al, , 2019b(Cai et al, , 2019c(Cai et al, , 2019d. En ninguno encontré un debate en torno a la revisión por pares en sí misma y sobre las dinámicas de sus modelos, así como del impacto de estos en la investigación y sus procesos de comunicación; pero claramente resultan importantes como punto de partida para caminar hacia la revisión por pares como un diálogo para aprender y crecer en colectivo. ...

Choosing and Justifying Robust Methods for Educational Research
  • Citing Article
  • July 2019

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

... (e.g., Cai et al., 2019Cai et al., , 2019Cobb, 2007;Mason, 2011) (Mason, 2011;Mason & Waywood, 1996) (Lampert, 1990Schoenfeld, 2008) 5.2 (Su & Bellmann, 2018) Brandom (1994 1 5.3 (Radford, 2021) (e.g., Abtahi, 2022;Chen, 2023;Ernest, 2018Ernest, , 2020 6. ...

Theoretical Framing as Justifying
  • Citing Article
  • May 2019

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

... A partir de recomendaciones de revisores/editores para la estructura y escritura científica (v. g. Cai et al., 2019;Mesa y Wagner, 2019;Recio y González, 2007), en las que se citan ejemplos concretos de buenas prácticas y errores comunes en dichos procesos, colaboramos como grupo para construir rúbricas sistemáticas útiles para evaluar nuestros manuscritos antes de ser enviados a las revistas especializadas. Asimismo estudiamos fuentes que proveían visiones éticas para la evaluación por pares (Editorial, 2019;López-López et. ...

Posing Significant Research Questions
  • Citing Article
  • March 2019

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education