Moritz Walter’s research while affiliated with University of Tübingen and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (6)


Supplementary Table S2
  • Data
  • File available

August 2018

·

9 Reads

·

Stephan Wolpert

·

·

[...]

·

Study inclusion/exclusion requirements.

Download





Fig. 1. Pure tone audiometry. Averaged pure tone audiometry (mean ± SD) of all volunteer (black) and tinnitus (red) participants of right and left ears separately. Three-way ANOVA with repetition was used, n = 17 for each group (volunteer and tinnitus). There is no statistical difference between the volunteer and tinnitus group in hearing threshold level at any frequency. Frequency F = 30.7, p = 0.0001, group F = 0.34, p = 0.56; ear side F = 0.18, p = 0.67; frequency*group F = 0.54, p = 0.84; frequency*ear side F = 0.35, p = 0.95; frequency*group*ear side F = 0.14, p = 0.99.
Table 1 Predefined ROIs for task evoked and resting-state fMRI. A: Task evoked predefined ROIs
Table 2 Task evoked fMRI in tinnitus. A: Reduced task evoked fMRI in defined ROIs
Fig. 3. Amplitude reduction in ABR wave/Latency shift in ABR wave. (A) Averaged ABR wave I, III, V, and VI latency-supra-threshold amplitude plot at 75 dB SPL for volunteer and tinnitus group of right and left ears separately. Amplitudes of the waves are connected via spline. Three-way ANOVA with repetition was used. Each group n = 17. Tukey's multiple comparison tests-for wave V significant amplitude reduction in tinnitus for the right ear (volunteer 0.45 ± 0.16 μV; tinnitus 0.34 ± 0.09 μV; p = 0.046) and for the left ear (0.48 ± 0.17 μV; tinnitus 0.32 ± 0.08 μV; p = 0.02). (B) Intensity-Latency function curve for averaged group ABR waves I, III, V, and VI (at 75 and 65 dB SPL; Wave V also at 55, 45, 35 and 25 dB SPL) of the right and left ears separately. Three-way ANOVA with repetition was used. Each group n = 17. Tukey's multiple comparison tests-for wave V significant latency shift in tinnitus for right ear (volunteer 5.23 ± 0.45 ms; tinnitus 5.50 ± 0.23 ms; p = 0.034) and for the left ear (5.22 ± 0.26 ms; tinnitus 5.54 ± 0.20 ms; p = 0.016) at 75 dB SPL. For the right ear at 35 (p = 0.02), 25 (p = 0.013), for the left ear at 35 (p = 0.02) significant latency shift between tinnitus and volunteer. ABR, auditory brainstem response; dB, decibel; SPL, sound pressure level; μV, microvolt; ms, milliseconds.
Fig. 4. Functional connectivity pattern of defined auditory brain regions of interest. Significant Pearson correlation of BOLD dependent time courses of different brain regions shown for volunteer (A) and tinnitus (B) group (n = 17; p < 0.05) for positive (upper panel red) and negative (lower panel blue) connectivity. The darker red/blue is for connectivities between lower and higher level auditory nuclei in right and left hemispheres and brighter red/blue for connectivities between regions participating to sound detection as the posterior insula (BA13P) and the hippocampus. The thickness of lines corresponds to the correlation-value. R, right; L, left; CN, cochlear nucleus; SOC, superior olivary complex; IC, inferior colliculus; MGB, medial geniculate body; BA, Brodmann area; A, anterior; P, posterior; Hipp, hippocampus; BOLD, blood oxygenation level depended.

+2

Reduced sound-evoked and resting-state BOLD fMRI connectivity in tinnitus

August 2018

·

499 Reads

·

69 Citations

NeuroImage Clinical

The exact neurophysiological basis of chronic tinnitus, which affects 10-15% of the population, remains unknown and is controversial at many levels. It is an open question whether phantom sound perception results from increased central neural gain or not, a crucial question for any future therapeutic intervention strategies for tinnitus. We performed a comprehensive study of mild hearing-impaired participants with and without tinnitus, excluding participants with co-occurrences of hyperacusis. A right-hemisphere correlation between tinnitus loudness and auditory perceptual difficulty was observed in the tinnitus group, independent of differences in hearing thresholds. This correlation was linked to reduced and delayed sound-induced suprathreshold auditory brain responses (ABR wave V) in the tinnitus group, suggesting subsided rather than exaggerated central neural responsiveness. When anatomically predefined auditory regions of interest were analysed for altered sound-evoked BOLD fMRI activity, it became evident that subcortical and cortical auditory regions and regions involved in sound detection (posterior insula, hippocampus), responded with reduced BOLD activity in the tinnitus group, emphasizing reduced, rather than increased, central neural gain. Regarding previous findings of evoked BOLD activity being linked to positive connectivities at rest, we additionally analysed r-fcMRI responses in anatomically predefined auditory regions and regions associated with sound detection. A profound reduction in positive interhemispheric connections of homologous auditory brain regions and a decline in the positive connectivities between lower auditory brainstem regions and regions involved in sound detection (hippocampus, posterior insula) were observed in the tinnitus group. The finding went hand-in-hand with the emotional (amygdala, anterior insula) and temporofrontal/stress-regulating regions (prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus) that were no longer positively connected with auditory cortex regions in the tinnitus group but were instead positively connected to lower-level auditory brainstem regions. Delayed sound processing, reduced sound-evoked BOLD fMRI activity and altered r-fcMRI in the auditory midbrain correlated in the tinnitus group and showed right hemisphere dominance as did tinnitus loudness and perceptual difficulty. The findings suggest that reduced central neural gain in the auditory stream may lead to phantom perception through a failure to energize attentional/stress-regulating networks for contextualization of auditory-specific information. Reduced auditory-specific information flow in tinnitus has until now escaped detection in humans, as low-level auditory brain regions were previously omitted from neuroimaging studies. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS0006332.

Citations (1)


... Emerging evidence suggests that functional interactions between limbic structures and auditory cortices play a crucial role in mediating the emotions associated with tinnitus phantom (Rauschecker et al. 2015;Kraus and Canlon 2012;Mühlau et al. 2006;Landgrebe et al. 2009;Mayberg et al. 2005;Vanneste et al. 2010;Landgrebe et al. 2009;Mirz et al. 2000;Hofmeier et al. 2018). This is supported by observed enhancements in connectivity between auditory cortical regions and limbic emotional centers (Vanneste et al. 2010). ...

Reference:

Theta–Beta/Gamma Coupling Identifies Bothersome Tinnitus Induced by Thalamocortical Dysrhythmia
Reduced sound-evoked and resting-state BOLD fMRI connectivity in tinnitus

NeuroImage Clinical