Morgan M. Quail’s research while affiliated with University of California, Merced and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Depiction of a hypothetical GRN architecture
(A) Schematic of a simple GRN in which A and B cooperatively activate B, C activates A and itself, and B represses C in a manner that can override the self-activation of C. (B) The network topology table represents the direct activating, inhibiting, and null connections by 1, -1, and 0, respectively. (C) The protein coordination parameters are assigned to each gene in the genome and qualitatively describe the coordination between each gene’s regulatory TFs. ‘ActivatorNmer’ decides whether the activators of a gene work independently (0) or cooperatively (1); ‘RepressorNmer’ decides whether the repressors of a gene work independently (0) or cooperatively (1). f0 determines the basal expression level of a gene and whether its activators or repressors outcompete the other.
Demonstration of the combinatorial Hill functions (A and B), and the regulation function f A n e t (C and D) under the regulation of an activator and a repressor
In the top two panels (A and B), two combinatorial Hill functions are plotted; in (A) two activators work independently to activate a target gene, while in (B), two repressors work synergistically. In the bottom two panels (C and D), the dependence of the regulatory function f A n e t on the activating and repressing combinatorial Hill functions is plotted for two example cases. In (C), f A n e t achieves the basal transcription rate fraction of 0.5 when there is a lack of both activator and repressor, or when both are present. Activation (resp. inhibition) occurs when the activator (resp. repressor) is abundant, and the repressor (resp. activator) is scarce. In (D), The Hill coefficient, k, determines the steepness of the regulation function; The basal expression level, f0, controls the position of the middle plane and can slide between 0 and 1. The threshold T decides the TF abundance that will trigger the activation or repression.
A flowchart illustrating the step-by-step processes of our iterative computational and experimental strategy to infer GRNs and predict novel attractors
(A) Five GRN architectures were arbitrarily generated as references in the in silico test. They have 5–9 genes and at least 9 different fixed-point attractors and no oscillations. The pointed and blunt arrows represent activating and repressing regulatory interactions, respectively. (B) GRN dynamics when initiated near a fixed-point attractor of a reference GRN. The consensus GRN was inferred by the attractors of the 5-gene in silico reference GRN. The initial states were obtained by the attractor position plus a uniform distributed random variable by Eq K in S1 Text. The perturbation power was set to 0.1. The dynamics showed similarly good agreement in other reference GRNs. (C) Positive correlation between Anet similarity (Hamming distance on the horizontal axis) and attractor profiles similarity (attractor distance on the vertical axis). Each column in the box plot contains 1000 random A n e t m u t mutated from the A n e t r e f consisting of 5 genes. Similar strong correlation has been observed in all other reference GRNs (see Fig C in S1 Text). (D) in silico attractors prediction result summary. Two attractors considered matched have an attractor distance less than 0.16 (a cutoff below which a simple null model has a less than 5% chance of producing matched attractors; see Table C in S1 Text). Overall, the single-knockout reference GRNs produced 384 fixed-point attractors and the single-knockout inferred GRNs produced 385. Of these attractors, 273 were matched. No attractors were matched in a random GRN.
The in silico test comparison result in F1 score (upper panel), AUROC (middle panel), and AUPRC (bottom panel)
The F1 scores are calculated using a threshold cutoff of 0.5 for all models. Best performances are marked by asterisks for symmetric and asymmetric methods.

+4

Inferring gene regulatory networks using transcriptional profiles as dynamical attractors
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2023

·

107 Reads

·

2 Citations

Ruihao Li

·

·

Morgan M. Quail

·

[...]

·

Genetic regulatory networks (GRNs) regulate the flow of genetic information from the genome to expressed messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and thus are critical to controlling the phenotypic characteristics of cells. Numerous methods exist for profiling mRNA transcript levels and identifying protein-DNA binding interactions at the genome-wide scale. These enable researchers to determine the structure and output of transcriptional regulatory networks, but uncovering the complete structure and regulatory logic of GRNs remains a challenge. The field of GRN inference aims to meet this challenge using computational modeling to derive the structure and logic of GRNs from experimental data and to encode this knowledge in Boolean networks, Bayesian networks, ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, or other modeling frameworks. However, most existing models do not incorporate dynamic transcriptional data since it has historically been less widely available in comparison to “static” transcriptional data. We report the development of an evolutionary algorithm-based ODE modeling approach (named EA) that integrates kinetic transcription data and the theory of attractor matching to infer GRN architecture and regulatory logic. Our method outperformed six leading GRN inference methods, none of which incorporate kinetic transcriptional data, in predicting regulatory connections among TFs when applied to a small-scale engineered synthetic GRN in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Moreover, we demonstrate the potential of our method to predict unknown transcriptional profiles that would be produced upon genetic perturbation of the GRN governing a two-state cellular phenotypic switch in Candida albicans. We established an iterative refinement strategy to facilitate candidate selection for experimentation; the experimental results in turn provide validation or improvement for the model. In this way, our GRN inference approach can expedite the development of a sophisticated mathematical model that can accurately describe the structure and dynamics of the in vivo GRN.

Download

Figure 1: Depiction of a hypothetical GRN architecture. (a) Schematic of a simple GRN in which A and B cooperatively activate B, C activates A and itself, and B represses C in a manner that can override the self-activation of C. (b) The network topology table represents the direct activating, inhibiting, and null connections by 1, -1, and 0, respectively. (c) The protein coordination parameters are assigned to each gene in the genome and qualitatively describe the coordination between each gene's regulatory TFs. 'ActivatorNmer' decides whether the activators of a gene work independently (0) or cooperatively (1); 'RepressorNmer' decides whether the repressors of a gene work independently (0) or cooperatively (1). f 0 determines the basal expression level of a gene and whether its activators or repressors outcompete the other.
Figure 4: The in silico test comparison result in F1 score (upper panel), AUROC (middle panel), and AUPRC (bottom panel). The F1 scores are calculated using a threshold cutoff of 0.5 for all models. Best performances are marked by asterisks for symmetric and asymmetric methods.
Fig. 5 b. In glucose, Gal80 blocks Gal4 from activating SWI5 , while galactose can inactivate Gal80 402
Experimental evidence for regulatory associations in the synthetic circuit
Inferring gene regulatory networks using transcriptional profiles as dynamical attractors

March 2023

·

85 Reads

Genetic regulatory networks (GRNs) regulate the flow of genetic information from the genome to expressed messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and thus are critical to controlling the phenotypic characteristics of cells. Numerous methods exist for profiling mRNA transcript levels and identifying protein-DNA binding interactions at the genome-wide scale. These enable researchers to determine the structure and output of transcriptional regulatory networks, but uncovering the complete structure and regulatory logic of GRNs remains a challenge. The field of GRN inference aims to meet this challenge using computational modeling to derive the structure and logic of GRNs from experimental data and to encode this knowledge in Boolean networks, Bayesian networks, ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, or other modeling frameworks. However, most existing models do not incorporate dynamic transcriptional data since it has historically been less widely available in comparison to “static” transcriptional data. We report the development of an evolutionary algorithm-based ODE modeling approach that integrates kinetic transcription data and the theory of attractor matching to infer GRN architecture and regulatory logic. Our method outperformed six leading GRN inference methods, none of which incorporate kinetic transcriptional data, in predicting regulatory connections among TFs when applied to a small-scale engineered synthetic GRN in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Moreover, we demonstrate the potential of our method to predict unknown transcriptional profiles that would be produced upon genetic perturbation of the GRN governing a two-state cellular phenotypic switch in Candida albicans . We established an iterative refinement strategy to facilitate candidate selection for experimentation; the experimental results in turn provide validation or improvement for the model. In this way, our GRN inference approach can expedite the development of a sophisticated mathematical model that can accurately describe the structure and dynamics of the in vivo GRN. Author Summary The establishment of distinct transcriptional programs, where specific sets of genes are activated or repressed, is fundamental to all forms of life. Sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, often referred to as regulatory transcription factors, form interconnected gene regulatory networks (GRNs) which underlie the establishment and maintenance of specific transcriptional programs. Since their discovery, many modeling approaches have sought to understand the structure and regulatory behaviors of these GRNs. The field of GRN inference uses experimental measurements of transcript abundance to predict how regulatory transcription factors interact with their downstream target genes to establish specific transcriptional programs. However, most prior approaches have been limited by the exclusive use of “static” or steady-state measurements. We have developed a unique approach which incorporates dynamic transcriptional data into a sophisticated ordinary differential equation model to infer GRN structures that give rise to distinct transcriptional programs. Our model not only outperforms six other leading models, it also is capable of accurately predicting how changes in GRN structure will impact the resulting transcriptional programs. These unique attributes of our model, combined with “real world” experimental validation of our model predictions, represent a significant advance in the field of gene regulatory network inference.


Transcriptional Circuits Regulating Developmental Processes in Candida albicans

December 2020

·

162 Reads

·

37 Citations

Candida albicans is a commensal member of the human microbiota that colonizes multiple niches in the body including the skin, oral cavity, and gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of healthy individuals. It is also the most common human fungal pathogen isolated from patients in clinical settings. C. albicans can cause a number of superficial and invasive infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals. The ability of C. albicans to succeed as both a commensal and a pathogen, and to thrive in a wide range of environmental niches within the host, requires sophisticated transcriptional regulatory programs that can integrate and respond to host specific environmental signals. Identifying and characterizing the transcriptional regulatory networks that control important developmental processes in C. albicans will shed new light on the strategies used by C. albicans to colonize and infect its host. Here, we discuss the transcriptional regulatory circuits controlling three major developmental processes in C. albicans: biofilm formation, the white-opaque phenotypic switch, and the commensal-pathogen transition. Each of these three circuits are tightly knit and, through our analyses, we show that they are integrated together by extensive regulatory crosstalk between the core regulators that comprise each circuit.

Citations (2)


... This means DeConveil may not capture CNV-driven regulatory cascades, where gene expression changes arise due to disruptions in transcriptional networks rather than direct CNV effects. Future extensions could incorporate gene regulatory network (GRN) models to map CNV-mediated transcriptional changes [56] or use causal inference approaches to distinguish direct vs. indirect CNV effects [57]. ...

Reference:

Extending differential gene expression testing to handle genome aneuploidy in cancer
Inferring gene regulatory networks using transcriptional profiles as dynamical attractors

... Biofilm is a three-dimensional structural material composed of microbial cells and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [14,15], which is commonly manifested by the formation of wrinkled colonies [16], and has the properties of increased adhesion, decreased motility, increased hydrophobicity and increased resistance to hydrogen peroxide [17,18]. Therefore, biofilm can be used as a ' protective suit ' for microorganisms to help them resist various environmental stresses, including nutritional deficiencies, extreme temperatures, acid, alkaline environments, ultraviolet rays, and disinfectants [19][20][21][22][23]. Research on microbial biofilm has primarily focused on bacterial systems, leading to substantial advancements in understanding their taxonomy, development, structural organization, and functional roles [21,24]. ...

Transcriptional Circuits Regulating Developmental Processes in Candida albicans