Moeka Mong Jia Teo’s research while affiliated with Taipei Medical University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Microsaccade behavior associated with inhibitory control in athletes in the antisaccade task
  • Article

February 2025

·

23 Reads

Psychology of Sport and Exercise

·

Yi-Hsuan Chang

·

Cesar Barquero

·

[...]

·


Each trial started with a central colored fixation point (20 cd/m²: two isoluminant colors for pro‐ and anti‐saccade conditions, respectively) on a black background (0.1 cd/m²). After 1000 ms, a blank screen was presented for 200 ms (gap) before target stimulus presentation. Participants were required to move their eyes to the stimulus in the pro‐saccade condition, but move to the opposite location in the anti‐saccade condition. Note that the displayed FP colors here is only for illustration of the paradigm.
SRT distribution in the pro‐ and anti‐saccade condition in athletes and nonathletes (NON). The distribution of correct or erroneous SRTs for (A) pro‐saccades or (B) anti‐saccades in athletes and for (C) pro‐saccades or (D) anti‐saccades in NON. The vertical dotted lines represent the range of anticipatory and express saccades. Pro, pro‐saccade, Anti, anti‐saccade, SRT, saccade reaction times.
Saccade behaviors in the pro‐saccade and anti‐saccade condition in athletes and NON. Modulation of task condition on direction error rates (A) and saccade reaction times (B) in athletes and NON. The large squares and error bars represent the mean values ± standard error across participants. The small dots represent the mean value for each participant. *Indicates p ≤ 0.05.
Saccade metrics in the pro‐saccade and anti‐saccade condition in athletes and NON. Modulation of task condition on saccade peak velocity (A), saccade amplitude (B), saccade main sequence slope (peak velocity/amplitude) (C), and endpoint deviation (D) in athletes and NON. The large squares and error bars represent the mean values ± standard error across participants. The small dots represent the mean value for each participant. *Indicates p ≤ 0.05.
Anticipatory saccade frequency and metrics in athletes and NON. Anticipatory saccade frequency (A), saccade peak velocity (B), saccade amplitude (C), and saccade main sequence (D) shown in athletes and NON. In (A–C), the large squares and error bars represent the mean values ± standard error across participants. The small dots represent the mean value for each participant. In (D), solid lines indicate the linear regression lines and small dots represent the mean value for each participant. *Indicates p ≤ 0.05.

+3

Saccade Latency and Metrics in the Interleaved Pro‐ and Anti‐Saccade Task in Open Skill Sports Athletes
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

August 2024

·

75 Reads

·

2 Citations

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

Evidence has demonstrated that athletes exhibit superior cognitive performance associated with executive control. In the oculomotor system, this function has been examined using the interleaved pro‐saccade and anti‐saccade task (IPAST), wherein participants, prior to target appearance, are instructed to either automatically look at the peripheral target (pro‐saccade) or suppress the automatic response and voluntarily look in the opposite direction (anti‐saccade). While the IPAST has provided much insight into sensorimotor and inhibitory processing, it has yet to be performed in athletes. Moreover, limited research has examined saccade metrics in athletes. Here, we examined saccade latency and movement kinematics in the IPAST among athletes (N = 40) and nonathletes (NON) (N = 40). Higher direction error rates were obtained in the anti‐saccade compared to the pro‐saccade condition, with no differences between athletes and NON noted. Significantly faster saccade latencies were observed in athletes compared to NON in both conditions, in addition to faster pro‐saccades compared to anti‐saccades. Furthermore, athletes showed significantly higher frequencies and faster latencies of express saccades compared to NON in correct pro‐saccades. Additionally, athletes exhibited significantly faster latencies of express saccades compared to NON in erroneous anti‐saccades. Differences in saccade metrics between athletes and NON were not seen. Overall, these findings demonstrate that athletes display altered saccade performance likely associated with sensorimotor and preparatory processing, highlighting the potential of using IPAST to objectively investigate sensorimotor and cognitive functions in athletes.

View access options

Citations (1)


... Saccadic eye movements, which are rapid movements that position the object image on the central retina, are used to obtain clear visual information from the environment. The properties of saccade in athletes have been examined in numerous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. For instance, athletes such as clay shooters [1], volleyball players [9,11], and some open-skill sports athletes [2] have shorter saccade latencies compared to nonathletes. ...

Reference:

Interocular Timing Differences in Horizontal Saccades of Ball Game Players
Saccade Latency and Metrics in the Interleaved Pro‐ and Anti‐Saccade Task in Open Skill Sports Athletes

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports