Ming-Ying Hsieh’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


The experimental arena and quantitative stimuli. a The experiment arena was an acrylic tank (60 × 42 × 30 cm) filled with water to 15 cm depth. We mounted a GoPro (SPTM1) to the back wall of the tank and set a JVC camcorder (GZ-E10BU) on a tripod next to the tank. b We used wooden cubes (1.5 × 1.5 × 1 cm) colored with red acrylic paints (Mona, SG-203) on a white Velcro board (11 × 11 cm) as the quantitative stimuli. c Each turtle was trained to swim toward the stimuli and was rewarded with a food pellet when it reached the designated area (the square marked with blue stripes) for the correct (larger) quantity
Comparison of ratio effects between red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, orange) and stripe-necked turtle (Mauremys sinensis, blue) in the fixed numerosity tests (Experiment 1). Each numerosity pair was tested 100 times on each individual, starting from the lowest ratio (1 vs 3, ratio = 0.33) to the highest ratio (6 vs 7, ratio = 0.86)
Comparison of ratio effects between red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, orange) and stripe-necked turtle (Mauremys sinensis, blue) in the mixed numerosity tests (Experiment 2). a The success rates between the two turtle species did not exhibit notable differences when all three phases were combined (Table S3). The performance of both species adhered to Weber’s law, where an increased ratio led to decreased performance (P < 0.001). b When analyzing the data separately by phase, the stripe-necked turtles showed a more pronounced decrease in performance during high-ratio trials compared to the sliders during the first phase (P = 0.0476)
Trained quantity discrimination in the invasive red-eared slider and a comparison with the native stripe-necked turtle
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2024

·

166 Reads

·

1 Citation

Animal Cognition

Feng-Chun Lin

·

·

Ming-Ying Hsieh

·

[...]

·

Little is known about the behavioral and cognitive traits that best predict invasion success. Evidence is mounting that cognitive performance correlates with survival and fecundity, two pivotal factors for the successful establishment of invasive populations. We assessed the quantity discrimination ability of the globally invasive red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). We further compared it to that of the native stripe-necked turtle (Mauremys sinensis), which has been previously evaluated for its superior quantity discrimination ability. Specifically, our experimental designs aimed to quantify the learning ability as numerosity pairs increased in difficulty (termed fixed numerosity tests), and the immediate response when turtles were presented with varied challenges concurrently in the same tests (termed mixed numerosity tests). Our findings reaffirm the remarkable ability of freshwater turtles to discern numerical differences as close as 9 vs 10 (ratio = 0.9), which was comparable to the stripe-necked turtle’s performance. However, the red-eared slider exhibited a moderate decrease in performance in high ratio tests, indicating a potentially enhanced cognitive capacity to adapt to novel challenges. Our experimental design is repeatable and is adaptable to a range of freshwater turtles. These findings emphasize the potential importance of cognitive research to the underlying mechanisms of successful species invasions.

Download

The experiment arena and quantitative stimuli. A The experiment arena was an acrylic tank (60 × 42 × 30 cm) filled with water to 15 cm depth. We mounted a GoPro (CHDHB-601) to the back wall of the tank and a JVC camcorder (GZ-E10BU) on a tripod next to the tank. B We used wooden cubes (1.5 × 1.5 × 1 cm) colored with red acrylic paints (Mona, SG-203) on a white Velcro board (11 × 11 cm) as the quantitative stimuli. C Each turtle was trained to swim toward the stimuli and was rewarded with a food pellet when it reached the designated area (the square marked with blue stripes) for the correct (larger) quantity
The daily success rate of the turtles in the fixed numerosity tests (Experiment 1). Each numerosity pair was tested 20 times per day on each of the five turtles for five days. The entire experiment lasted 25 days, starting from the lowest ratio (1 versus 3, ratio = 0.33, day 1–5) to the highest ratio (6 versus 7, ratio = 0.85, day 21–25) including two transfer tests and one conflict test. The solid lines with shaded areas are predicted mean probabilities of success ± 1 standard error, estimated from the best-fit model (Table 2 & Additional file 1: Table S2). The horizontal dashed line denotes random choice of the smaller and larger quantity
The 5-day averaged success rate of the turtles in the mixed numerosity tests (Experiment 2). Each numerosity pair was tested twice a day in a random order on each of the five turtles for five days. A Phase I comprised numerosity pairs of small numbers (1–5) with a ratio ranging 0.2–0.8; B Phase II comprised numerosity pairs of at least one large number (6–10) with a ratio ranging 0.2–0.8; C Phase III comprised numerosity pairs of at least one large number (6–10) with a ratio ranging 0.2–0.9. The solid lines with shaded areas are predicted mean probabilities of success ± 1 standard error, estimated from the best-fit model (Table 2 & Additional file 1: Table S3). The dots are the observed success rates with 10% jittering using jitter function in R v3.6.1, and the horizontal dashed line denotes random choice of the smaller and larger quantity
Superior continuous quantity discrimination in a freshwater turtle

September 2021

·

246 Reads

·

18 Citations

Frontiers in Zoology

Background Quantity discrimination, the ability to discriminate a magnitude of difference or discrete numerical information, plays a key role in animal behavior. While quantitative ability has been well documented in fishes, birds, mammals, and even in previously unstudied invertebrates and amphibians, it is still poorly understood in reptiles and has never been tested in an aquatic turtle despite the fact that evidence is accumulating that reptiles possess cognitive skills and learning ability. To help address this deficiency in reptiles, we investigated the quantitative ability of an Asian freshwater turtle, Mauremys sinensis , using red cubes on a white background in a trained quantity discrimination task. While spontaneous quantity discrimination methods are thought to be more ecologically relevant, training animals on a quantity discrimination task allows more comparability across taxa. Results We assessed the turtles’ quantitative performance in a series of tests with increasing quantity ratios and numerosities. Surprisingly, the turtles were able to discriminate quantities of up to 9 versus 10 (ratio = 0.9), which shows a good quantitative ability that is comparable to some endotherms. Our results showed that the turtles’ quantitative performance followed Weber’s law, in which success rate decreased with increasing quantity ratio across a wide range of numerosities. Furthermore, the gradual improvement of their success rate across different experiments and phases suggested that the turtles possess learning ability. Conclusions Reptile quantitative ability has long been ignored and therefore is likely under-estimated. More comparative research on numerical cognition across a diversity of species will greatly contribute to a clearer understanding of quantitative ability in animals and whether it has evolved convergently in diverse taxa.

Citations (2)


... During the training phase, it typically took several weeks for the turtles to associate food with the tweezers, and a similar amount of time to transfer the food reward from the tweezers to the red cubes. Although the learning speed varied for each individual, the overall training time was approximately 60 days (Lin et al. 2024). Therefore, response to the red cubes on either Day 1 (MS16, MS33, and MS31) or Day 2 (MS11 and MS14) was likely due to memory rather than relearning. ...

Reference:

Comparison of numerosity concept in a freshwater turtle after a two-year retention interval
Trained quantity discrimination in the invasive red-eared slider and a comparison with the native stripe-necked turtle

Animal Cognition

... As ratios get smaller, the quantities become more dissimilar, and differences become easier to detect. A large range of species have shown ratio dependence in quantification tasks (Beran, 2001;Potrich et al., 2015;Ditz & Nieder, 2016;Lucon-Xiccato et al., 2018;d'Ettorre et al., 2021;Lin et al., 2021). Researchers typically interpreted ratio effects on quantitative judgments as evidence supporting Weber's Law. ...

Superior continuous quantity discrimination in a freshwater turtle

Frontiers in Zoology