Mihir Bellare’s research while affiliated with University of California, San Diego and other places

A two-input function is a dual PRF if it is a PRF when keyed by either of its inputs. Dual PRFs are assumed in the design and analysis of numerous primitives and protocols including HMAC, AMAC, TLS 1.3 and MLS. But, not only do we not know whether particular functions on which the assumption is made really are dual PRFs; we do not know if dual PRFs even exist. What if the goal is impossible? This paper addresses this with a foundational treatment of dual PRFs, giving constructions based on standard assumptions. This provides what we call a generic validation of the dual PRF assumption. Our approach is to introduce and construct symmetric PRFs, which imply dual PRFs and may be of independent interest. We give a general construction of a symmetric PRF based on a function having a weak form of collision resistance coupled with a leakage hardcore function, a strengthening of the usual notion of hardcore functions we introduce. We instantiate this general construction in two ways to obtain two specific symmetric and dual PRFs, the first assuming any collision-resistant hash function and the second assuming any one-way permutation. A construction based on any one-way function evades us and is left as an intriguing open problem.

In Internet security protocols including TLS 1.3, KEMTLS, MLS and Noise, $\textsf{HMAC}$ is being assumed to be a dual-PRF, meaning a PRF not only when keyed conventionally (through its first input), but also when “swapped” and keyed (unconventionally) through its second (message) input. We give the first in-depth analysis of the dual-PRF assumption on $\textsf{HMAC}$. For the swap case, we note that security does not hold in general, but completely characterize when it does; we show that $\textsf{HMAC}$ is swap-PRF secure if and only if keys are restricted to sets satisfying a condition called feasibility, that we give, and that holds in applications. The sufficiency is shown by proof and the necessity by attacks. For the conventional PRF case, we fill a gap in the literature by proving PRF security of $\textsf{HMAC}$ for keys of arbitrary length. Our proofs are in the standard model, make assumptions only on the compression function underlying the hash function, and give good bounds in the multi-user setting. The positive results are strengthened through achieving a new notion of variable key-length PRF security that guarantees security even if different users use keys of different lengths, as happens in practice.

We consider a transform, called Derive-then-Derandomize, that hardens a given signature scheme against randomness failure and implementation error. We prove that it works. We then give a general lemma showing indifferentiability of a class of constructions that apply a shrinking output transform to an MD-style hash function. Armed with these tools, we give new proofs for the widely standardized and used $\textsf{EdDSA}$ signature scheme, improving prior work in two ways: (1) we give proofs for the case that the hash function is an MD-style one, reflecting the use of SHA512 in the NIST standard, and (2) we improve the tightness of the reduction so that one has guarantees for group sizes in actual use.

We introduce flexible password-based encryption (FPBE), an extension of traditional password-based encryption designed to meet the operational and security needs of contemporary applications like end-to-end secure cloud storage. Operationally, FPBE supports nonces, associated data and salt reuse. Security-wise, it strengthens the usual privacy requirement, and, most importantly, adds an authenticity requirement, crucial because end-to-end security must protect against a malicious server. We give an FPBE scheme called DtE that is not only proven secure, but with good bounds. The challenge, with regard to the latter, is in circumventing partitioning-oracle attacks, which is done by leveraging key-robust (also called key-committing) encryption and a notion of authenticity with corruptions. DtE can be instantiated to yield an efficient and practical FPBE scheme for the target applications.

We give a unified syntax, and a hierarchy of definitions of security of increasing strength, for non-interactive threshold signature schemes. These are schemes having a single-round signing protocol, possibly with one prior round of message-independent pre-processing. We fit FROST1 and BLS, which are leading practical schemes, into our hierarchy, in particular showing they meet stronger security definitions than they have been shown to meet so far. We also fit in our hierarchy a more efficient version FROST2 of FROST1 that we give. These definitions and results, for simplicity, all assume trusted key generation. Finally, we prove the security of FROST2 with key generation performed by an efficient distributed key generation protocol.