Michael Zorker's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (2)
Many charities rely on donations to support their work addressing some of the world’s most pressing problems. We conducted a meta-review to determine what interventions work to increase charitable donations. We found 21 systematic reviews incorporating 1339 primary studies and over 2,139,938 participants. Our meta-meta-analysis estimated the averag...
Transitioning toward plant-based diets can alleviate health and sustainability challenges. However, research on interventions that influence animal-product consumption remains fragmented and inaccessible to researchers and practitioners. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews, also known as a meta-review. We searched five databases for revi...
Citations
... It should be noted that in contrast to the studies mentioned here, which found an effect of deliberation on charitable giving (except Small et al., 2007), this is not always the case. For example, in a review of reviews on interventions in charitable giving, relying on either intuition or deliberation did not make a difference (Saeri et al., 2022). However, the interventions investigated in that paper were much more varied than considered here. ...
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/279615798038538-1443677009627_Q64/Alexander-Saeri.jpg)
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/282148100689933-1444280758321_Q64/Peter-Slattery.jpg)
... In order to lessen the burden of meat production from an ethical, environmental, and dietary perspective, switching to PBM could be a possible alternative [78]. Although there is still debate over PBM acceptance, it is crucial to understand customer demands to improve the quality of PBM and deliver similar textures and flavors that are comparable to those of animal meat products [24,79]. Country and region are relevant to consumers' perceptions and motivations, due to the differences in cultures, attitudes, traditions, environments, and behaviors across the world [66,67]. ...
