Michael Philbin’s research while affiliated with Hisun Pharmaceuticals USA and other places

Study Objective To evaluate the risk of relapse for patients with schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BP), and major depressive disorder (MDD) who switched antipsychotics compared with those who did not switch. Background Antipsychotics are commonly used for maintenance treatment of SZ, BP, and MDD but can have significant side effects, such as extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Adherence to treatment is important for reducing the risk of relapse, but fear of side effects may prompt medication switching. Methods Medicaid claims from 6 US states spanning 6 years were retrospectively analyzed for antipsychotic switching versus non-switching. For all patients with SZ, BD or MDD and for the subset of patients who also had ≥1 EPS diagnosis during the baseline period, times to the following outcomes, during a 2-year study period were analyzed: underlying disease relapse, psychiatric relapse, all-cause emergency room (ER) visit, all-cause inpatient (IP) admission and EPS diagnosis. Results Switchers (N=10,548) had a shorter time to disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, IP admissions, ER visits, and EPS diagnosis (all, log-rank P<0.001) than non-switchers (N=31,644). Switchers reached the median for IP admission (21.50 months) vs non-switchers (not reached) and for ER visits (switchers, 9.07 months; non-switchers, 13.35 months). For disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, and EPS diagnosis, <50% of patients had an event during the 2-year study period. Comparisons in a subgroup of patients with ≥1 EPS diagnosis revealed similar outcomes. Conclusions These results show that disease and other psychiatric relapse, all-cause ER visits, IP admissions, and EPS diagnosis occurred earlier for switchers than for non-switchers, suggesting that switching is associated with an increased risk of relapse in patients with SZ, BP and MDD. Funding Acknowledgements This study was supported by Teva Pharmaceuticals, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Aims: To evaluate the association of relapse and healthcare resource utilization in patients with schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BD), or major depressive disorder (MDD) who switched antipsychotic medication versus those who did not. Materials and Methods: Medicaid claims from six US states spanning 6 years were retrospectively analyzed for antipsychotic switching versus non-switching. For all patients with SZ, BD, or MDD, and for the subset of patients who also had ≥1 extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) diagnosis at baseline, times to the following outcomes were analyzed: underlying disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, all-cause emergency room (ER) visit, all-cause inpatient (IP) admission, and EPS diagnosis. Results: Switchers (N = 10,548) had a shorter time to disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, IP admissions, ER visits, and EPS diagnosis (all, log-rank P < 0.001) than non-switchers (N = 31,644). Switchers reached the median for IP admission (21.50 months) vs non-switchers (not reached) and for ER visits (switchers, 9.07 months; non-switchers, 13.35 months). For disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, and EPS diagnosis, <50% of patients had an event during the 2-year study period. Subgroup analysis of those with ≥1 EPS diagnosis revealed similar associations. Limitations: Only association, not causation, may be inferred, and there may be differences between the patient groups in parameters not evaluated. Conclusions: These results show that disease and other psychiatric relapse, all-cause ER visits, IP admissions, and EPS diagnosis occurred earlier for patients who switched antipsychotics than for those who did not, suggesting that switching is associated with an increased risk of relapse in patients with SZ, BD and MDD. This may be attributed to more-severely ill patients being less responsive than those with less-severe illness, which, in turn, may require more episodes of switching.

Introduction: Huntington’s disease (HD)-associated chorea and tardive dyskinesia (TD) are hyperkinetic movement disorders that can have deleterious effects on patients’ quality of life (QoL). Deutetrabenazine, a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HD-associated chorea and TD. It is structurally similar to tetrabenazine, an FDA-approved compound for treatment of chorea that is widely used off-label for treatment of TD, but has deuterium modifications that improve its pharmacokinetic profile. Areas covered: Herein, the authors cover the key clinical trials with deutetrabenazine in patients with HD-associated chorea (First-HD and ARC-HD) and in patients with TD (ARM-TD, AIM-TD, and RIM-TD). Expert opinion: Deutetrabenazine demonstrates consistent efficacy across patient types regardless of underlying psychiatric illness, or through use of dopamine-receptor antagonists (DRAs), which are the primary cause of TD. The safety profile of deutetrabenazine in clinical trials is similar to that of placebo. Long-term extension studies in both HD-associated chorea and TD show consistent efficacy and safety. Deutetrabenazine will likely be an integral part of the treatment strategy for HD-associated chorea and TD. Meanwhile, its potential to treat other hyperkinetic movement disorders is still under investigation.