Michael J. Toscano’s research while affiliated with University of Bern and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (76)


Influence of light exposure during late incubation, early feeding, and litter access posthatch on the stress response and body weight gain in laying hen chicks
  • Article

December 2024

·

15 Reads

The Journal of Applied Poultry Research

·

·

·

[...]

·

Michael J. Toscano

Figure 1. Bone mineral density (BMD) of humerus diaphysis from 8, 16 wk old pullets and 30 wk old hens. BMD was affected by age (P < 0.001), but not treatment or the interaction of treatment and age. Boxplots show medians, interquartile, and absolute ranges of raw data. The solid line represents the estimated mean, the dashed lines show the estimated 95 % confidence interval.
Figure 2. Length of tibia bones from 8, 16 wk old pullets and 30 wk old hens. The length of the whole tibia was estimated from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and was affected by age (P < 0.001), but not treatment or the interaction of treatment and age. Boxplots show medians, interquartile, and absolute ranges of raw data. The solid line represents the estimated mean, the dashed lines show the estimated 95 % confidence interval.
Figure 4. Keel bone fracture severity by rearing treatment and age in floor pens with perches (FL), a single-tiered (ST), or a 2-tiered aviary (TT). Boxplots show medians, interquartile, and absolute ranges of raw data. The solid line represents the estimated mean, the dashed lines show the estimated 95 % confidence interval.
Effects of pullet housing on bone development in aviary-housed Dekalb White hens
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2024

·

20 Reads

·

1 Citation

Poultry Science

The skeletal health of laying hens improves when birds are given opportunities to perform load-bearing movements with elevated structures, such as perches. We investigated how early access to elevated structures varying in complexity and height would affect bone quality and subsequent keel bone fractures in a layer multitiered aviary. Female Dekalb White pullets were reared in floor pens furnished with floor perches (FL), single-tiered aviaries (ST), or 2-tiered aviaries (TT; n = 5 pens/treatment) through 16 wk of age. At 17 wks, all structures were replaced with identical multitiered layer aviaries. The keel, both tibiae, and both humeri were collected from 60 euthanized birds from each rearing treatment at 8, 16 and 30 wk of age, and analyzed with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for bone mineral density and length. At 18, 26, 28, and 30 wk of age, 10 focal hens/pen were radiographed repeatedly and the presence, severity of keel bone fractures were assessed with a tagged visual analogue scale. The number of fractures was also recorded. At 16 wk of age, FL pullets had lower BMD of the tibia (P = 0.003), keel (P = 0.013), and humerus (P = 0.004) compared to ST and TT pullets. Most of the observed treatment differences disappeared after pullets were transferred to the aviary. BMD continued to increase for all hens through 30 wk of age. Pullet rearing did not affect the presence or severity of keel bone fractures, or number of new fractures incurred between ages (P > 0.05). The prevalence and severity of keel bone fractures increased between 26 to 28 wk and remained high to 30 wk of age (P < 0.0001). Hens experienced more new fractures between 26 to 30 wk than between 18 to 26 wk of age (P = 0.0046). The effects of pullet housing on bone quality were short-term when hens had access to adult housing with multiple opportunities for load-bearing movements. Keel fractures with minor severity were high in prevalence reflecting the use of radiography to assess this injury.

Download

Keel bone fractures affect laying hens’ mobility, but no evidence for reciprocal effects

July 2024

·

46 Reads

Keel bone fractures (KBF) are prevalent in commercial laying hens and are considered one of the greatest welfare concerns in the egg-production industry. While clear associations exist between KBF and animal mobility, suggesting that KBF impair mobility, the effect of mobility on KBF remains unclear. We combined data from three studies that assessed keel bone fracture severity through radiographs and monitored hens’ transitions between different zones of a multi-tier aviary system (the three tiers, a littered floor, and a winter garden) the week prior to radiograph. For each hen, we extracted two daily movement behaviours: the vertical distance travelled and the mean number of zones crossed within one transition; and two daily space-use behaviours: the time spent in the top tier and the unevenness of time spent across zones. We used hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modelling to estimate how a change in a behaviour predicted a later change in keel bone fracture severity, and vice versa. Increased fracture severity did not predict later changes in space-use behaviours, but it did predict changes in movement behaviours. Specifically, increased fracture severity led to decreased vertical travelled distance and a tendency to cross more zones within one transition, suggesting impaired mobility in hens with increased fracture severity. In contrast, we found no evidence that movement or space-use behaviours predict later change in fracture severity, challenging previous literature suggesting that vertical locomotion through jumping and flying may exacerbate keel bone fractures in complex three-dimensional systems due to increased risk of collisions. However, similar efforts accounting for the location of fractures on the keel could unveil the potential influence of movement and space-use behaviours in the formation and change (healing or worsening) of KBF and increase our ability to mitigate their effects.


Schematic representation of the holeboard arena
(1A) Two birds were tested simultaneously. The black arrows represent the direction of movement of rope and pulley system used to lift the start boxes. (1B, adapted from Dumontier et al [50]. The dimensions of the arena and the general spatial configuration of the cups as viewed from above. The cups were numbered from 1 to 8. The rectangles represent the platforms of the cups.
The relationship between reference memory errors (sum of all visits and revisits to unrewarded cups) and mean individual ramp use frequency in the cued phase (model estimates ± CI = 0.94 [0.88, 0.99], p = 0.08)
The black points connected by the black line represent the estimated marginal means and the shaded ribbon represents 95% confidence intervals. The coloured points represent reference memory errors (all visits–visits to rewarded cups) of focal birds’ colour-graded according to mean ramp use frequency.
The relationship between reference memory errors (sum of all visits and revisits to unrewarded cups) and mean individual ramp use frequency in the reversal phase (model estimates ± CI = 1.10 [1.01, 1.20], p = 0.05)
The black points connected by the black line represent the estimated marginal means and the shaded ribbon represents 95% confidence intervals. The coloured points represent reference memory errors (all visits–visits to rewarded cups) of focal birds, colour-graded according to mean ramp use frequency.
The relationship between working memory errors (sum of all revisits to rewarded cups) and mean individual ramp use frequency in the cued phase (model estimates ± CI = 0.77 [0.59, 1.00], p = 0.06)
The black points connected by the black line represent the estimated marginal means and the shaded ribbon represents 95% confidence intervals. The coloured points represent working memory errors (all visits to rewarded cups–rewarded visits) of focal birds, colour-graded according to mean ramp use frequency.
The relationship between ramp use frequency and spatial memory errors (A) Reference memory, B) General working memory) as the phase changed from cued to uncued phase. The point ranges represent the estimated marginal means of reference memory errors and the points are the raw data, colour graded according to mean ramp use frequency.
Mind the ramp: Association between early life ramp use and spatial cognition in laying hen pullets

April 2024

·

27 Reads

Ramps facilitate earlier access to complex environments and increase early life voluntary exercise, which may positively affect the cognitive development of chickens. This study focused on quantifying individual differences in ramp use and its impact on spatial cognition of laying hen pullets. Sixteen identical pens were housed with Lohmann Selected Leghorn (LSL) chicks of which eight chicks from each pen were colour marked from one day of age (DoA) to serve as focal birds. We quantified overall ramp use (walk/run, wing-assisted incline running, and jump/fly to and from ramps) by scan sampling recorded videos for 6, 10, 12, 20, 27, 41, and 55 DoA for all focal birds. From 56 to 95 DoA, long and short-term spatial memory of three focal birds per pen were assessed in a holeboard test in three consecutive phases: cued, uncued and reversal. Mixed model analysis showed that the spatial cognitive abilities of the birds were linked to differences in ramp use frequency averaged across all observation days. Birds with higher ramp use made fewer reference (Estimate ± Confidence Interval = 0.94 [0.88, 0.99], p = 0.08) and working memory errors (Est ± CI = 0.77 [0.59, 1.00], p = 0.06) in the cued phase than birds with lower ramp use. In contrast, birds with higher ramp use made more reference memory errors (Est ± CI = 1.10 [1.01, 1.20], p = 0.05) in the reversal phase. Birds with higher ramp use also made more reference memory errors compared to birds with lower ramp use as the phases changed from cued to uncued (p = 0.001). Our results indicate that there might be a relationship between early life ramp use and spatial cognition of laying hens.


Figure 2. Plot of successive eigenvalues for each corresponding PCA component.
Influence of keel impacts and laying hen behavior on keel bone damage

January 2024

·

58 Reads

·

4 Citations

Poultry Science

Keel bone damage, which presents as fractures and/or deviations of the keel, has been detected in laying hens housed in all types of systems. Factors leading to keel bone damage in hens housed with limited vertical space, such as those housed in furnished systems, are not well understood, and are the topic of this study. Ten focal hens from each of 12 furnished cages (4 rooms of 3 cages) were fitted with keel mounted tri-axial accelerometers. Their behavior was video recorded continuously over two 3-wk trials: the first when the hens were between 52 and 60 wk of age, and the second approximately 20 wk later. The integrity of each hen's keel was evaluated at the start and end of each 3-wk trial using digital computed tomography. We identified predominant behaviors associated with acceleration events sustained at the keel (collisions, aggressive interactions and grooming) by pairing accelerometer outputs with video data. For each recorded acceleration event we calculated the acceleration magnitudes as the maximum summed acceleration recorded during the event, and by calculating the area under the acceleration curve. A principle components analysis, which was used as a data reduction technique, resulted in the identification of 4 components that were used in a subsequent regression analysis. A key finding is that the number of collisions a hen has with structures in her environment, and the number of aggressive interactions that a hen is involved, each affect the likelihood that she will develop 1 or more fractures within a 3-wk time span. This relationship between hen behavior and keel fracture formation was independent of the magnitude of acceleration involved in the event. Observed behavior did not have an impact on the formation of keel bone deviations, further supporting reports that the mechanisms underlying the 2 types of keel bone damage are different.


Violin plot of the raw welfare indicators over day of age per treatment
Red and blue colours represent the treatment groups, OFH and STAN, respectively, and feather damage is represented in (a), body mass in (b), and KBF severity in (c).
Coefficient estimates of treatment (with STAN as reference group) for each behaviour across months after the transfer to the laying barn
We interpreted significance whenever the confidence interval did not cross the dashed line. If the point and confidence interval lie to the right of the dashed line, it indicates that the model estimates higher behavioural response in OFH hens compared to STAN hens. Bootstrapped outputs (estimates and p-values) are detailed in S4 Table.
Survival probability and average daily number of eggs per live hens, over time and per treatment
Survival probability of OFH and TRAN hens over time in the laying barn (a), and per pen (STAN pens: (b) and OFH pens: (c), including the two special pens containing 205 animals of the one treatment group but also an additional 20 Lohmann LSL hens, highlighted in grey). Average daily number of eggs per hen (data points), with the fitted sigmoid curve for each pen, during the first 60 days in the laying barn (d) and the full period in the laying barn (e). Their associated parameters a (as an indication of the level at which egg production stabilise), m (as an indication of the time point at the inflection point of the curve), and s (steepness of the curve at a/2) are illustrated in green (d), and estimates given in the S2 Fig. Red and blue colours represent the treatment groups, OFH and STAN, respectively.
Mean (±SD) observed values of raw welfare indicators per treatment groups
Mean observed values of raw behavioural data per treatment groups
We highlighted in bold the months and behaviours for which we found a significant treatment effect.
Commercial hatchery practices have long-lasting effects on laying hens’ spatial behaviour and health

December 2023

·

85 Reads

·

1 Citation

The commercial hatchery process is globally standardized and exposes billions of day-old layer chicks to stress every year. By alleviating this early stress, on-farm hatching is thought to improve animal welfare, yet little is known about its effects throughout production. This study compared welfare indicators and spatial behaviours during the laying period of hens hatched in an on-farm environment (OFH) to those hatched in a commercial hatchery and transferred at one day-old to a rearing barn (STAN). In particular, we assessed how OFH and TRAN hens differed in space-use and movement behaviours following the transfer to the laying barn at 17 weeks of age, a similar stressor encountered by STAN hens early in life, and determined whether effects aligned more with the ’silver-spoon’ or ’environmental matching’ hypothesis. We found that for the first three months post-transfer into the laying barn, OFH hens, on average, transitioned less between the aviary’s tiers and spent less time on the littered floor. Because OFH hens became behaviourally more similar to STAN hens over time, these results suggest that OFH hens required a prolonged period to establish their daily behavioural patterns. Furthermore, OFH hens had more severe keel bone fractures throughout the laying period but similar feather damage and body mass to STAN hens. No differences were found in hen mortality or the number of eggs per live hen. These findings support the environmental matching hypothesis and suggest that early-life stressors may have prepared hens for later-life stressors, underscoring the importance of both early-life and adult environments in enhancing animal welfare throughout production.


Figure 1. A 25-day average percentage of hens that used the different zones and locations within the aviary. 1 Floor littered area (LIT), nest box tier (NBT), lower level tier (LLT), top level tier (TLT), winter garden (WG).
Figure 2. A 25-day proportion of the average time duration spent in the different zones and locations within the aviary. 1 Floor littered area (LIT), nest box tier (NBT), lower level tier (LLT), top level tier (TLT), winter garden (WG).
Genetic parameter estimates for the use of an aviary with winter garden by laying hens

December 2023

·

46 Reads

Poultry Science

The behavioral activity of laying hens in an aviary is indicative of their welfare and health. Furthermore, hens’ usage of the different locations within an aviary has been shown to influence laying performance and egg quality. For example, hens that spent a longer duration of time in the nest during laying were observed to have lower laying performance. Therefore, understanding genetics of laying hens’ usage of the aviary could be important for predicting egg quality, production traits and health and welfare. The objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters for duration of time spent at different locations within the aviary and an adjacent winter garden using a multivariate repeatability model and to compare correlations between time spent in these locations. For this study, a total of 1,106 Dekalb white laying hens (Hendrix Genetics) were genotyped using a proprietary 60K SNP array. These hens had access to 5 different zones within the aviary, which included the top level tier, nest box tier, lower level tier, floor littered area and a winter garden. Hens were in the aviary for a total of 290 d and daily records of duration were collected for each hen visit to any location in the aviary, culminating in a total of 937,740 records. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.05 (0.01) to 0.28 (0.03) for the duration of time spent in the different zones. The lowest heritability was estimated for time spent at the lower level tier, while a higher heritability was estimated for time spent in the floor littered area. A moderately high negative genetic correlation of −0.59 (0.08) was observed between time spent in the top level tier and time spent in the floor littered area, while a favorable correlation of 0.37 (0.14) was found between time spent in the lower level tier and time spent in the winter garden. The findings of this study show that the duration of time spent at different zones within an aviary has genetic basis and could be used for selecting animals for better performance and higher welfare.


Figure 3. The number of vertical transitions made by Dekalb White focal hens at 3 h (morning, afternoon, and evening) during the first week of housing in a multitiered layer aviary. Hens were reared in 1 of 3 pullet rearing environments: floor (FL), single-tiered aviary (ST), or a 2-tiered aviary (TT; 10 focal hens/pen, n = 5 pens/rearing environment). The first full day that hens were housed in the layer aviary without atypical human disturbance is D1, followed by the seventh full day (D7). Raw data are displayed in box plots, where boxes represent the interquartile range, where the black line represents the median, the top of the box represents the 75th quartile, and the bottom of the box represents the 25th quartile. Whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values, while gray dots indicate outliers. The solid line overlaying the box plots is the estimated mean values from the generalized linear mixed effects model and the dashed lines are the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated means.
Figure 4. The proportion of floor eggs laid/pen by Dekalb White hens on a weekly basis from 18 to 28 wk of age. Hens were reared in 1 of 3 pullet rearing environments: floor (FL), single-tiered aviary (ST), or a 2-tiered aviary (TT). Raw data points for each rearing environment appear in gray. The solid black line overlaying the raw data points corresponds to the estimated mean values from the generalized linear mixed effects model and the colored ribbon represents the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated means.
Proportion of Dekalb White hens utilizing a multitiered aviary.
Providing elevated structures in the pullet rearing environment affects behavior during initial acclimation to a layer aviary

December 2023

·

65 Reads

·

2 Citations

Poultry Science

Spatial abilities of hens are particularly sensitive to development during early life. Experiences in pullet housing may have lasting consequences on adult hens’ movements in cage-free environments. We tested whether opportunities to access elevated spaces during rearing improved hens’ use of a multitiered aviary. Female Dekalb White pullets were reared in either floor pens (FL), single-tiered aviaries (ST), or 2-tiered aviaries (TT; n = 5 pens/environment) through 16 wk of age. Rearing structures were replaced with identical multitiered aviaries at 17 wk. The distribution of the flock within the aviary and the vertical transitions of 10 focal hens/pen across the aviary were determined from videos recorded during their first (D1) and seventh (D7) day of aviary access, as well as at 19, 23, and 27 wk of age. Prevalence of floor eggs was recorded weekly from 17 to 28 wk of age. On D1, more ST and TT hens utilized the aviary during the daytime (P = 0.0077), made more vertical transitions when searching for a roosting spot in the evening (P = 0.0021), and maintained a consistent distance traveled during transitions compared to FL hens (P = 0.02). These differences disappeared by D7, except that ST and TT hens continued to roost on the highest perches of the aviary more (P < 0.0001) than FL hens through 27 wk of age. FL hens laid more floor eggs than ST and TT hens for the first 2 wk of lay (P < 0.0001). The majority (97.9%) of vertical transitions was controlled. Uncontrolled transitions were highest at D1 and decreased by D7 (P = 0.0009) and were not affected by rearing (P = 0.33). The results suggest that hens reared with minimal height are hesitant to use the laying hen aviaries when they are first transferred. They acclimate within 1 to 2 wk, but continue to roost less in the highest accessible level.




Citations (58)


... These enrichments, which include dust baths, foraging substrates, and pecking blocks, encourage natural behaviors among hens. Engaging in these activities reduces boredom and stress, which are often precursors to aggressive interactions that can lead to physical harm [119]. ...

Reference:

Understanding the Causes of Keel Bone Damage and Its Effects on the Welfare of Laying Hens
Influence of keel impacts and laying hen behavior on keel bone damage

Poultry Science

... All datasets were collected by the Center for Proper Housing (ZTHZ)-Dataset1, first published by Rufener et al. in 2019 [14], used an infrared tracking system. Dataset2 was collected for a previous study [31] and Dataset3 has not been published. Dataset2 and 3 followed similar protocols, employing the same low frequency tracking system validated and described in [32], and maintained comparable housing conditions and number of tracked hens per time point. ...

Commercial hatchery practices have long-lasting effects on laying hens’ spatial behaviour and health

... gov/grad/solcalc/). Additional management details, including photos of the housing systems and description of data collection methods conduct for other studies on the same flock, have been described by Jones et al. (2023) and Pullin et al. (2024). ...

Providing elevated structures in the pullet rearing environment affects behavior during initial acclimation to a layer aviary

Poultry Science

... The behavioral basis of hierarchical positions and chain organization stems from the heterogeneities that make up social organization, distributing submission, dominance, and hierarchy [23]. This is a social phenomenon observed in various species, from mammals to birds, and plays a fundamental role in structuring social interactions and resource allocation within groups [24]. ...

Coup in the coop: Rank changes in chicken dominance hierarchies over maturation

Behavioural Processes

... We specified each model based on [38], where Driver and Tomasik described specification of multivariate latent process models that estimate the dynamics between two processes (here called variables) around their trends. Indeed, since it is expected that the severity of fractures increases with age [1,5,39] and that spatial behaviour changes with age [40], each model included smooth trends for both the fracture severity and behaviour to limit confounding effect of age. ...

Commercial laying hens exhibit long-term consistent individual differences and behavioural syndromes in spatial traits

... Chicks perform more vertical movements between the tiers of aviaries when provided with ramps, with most of these movements happening through ramps [28]. Ramp use is not limited to tier change; chicks also walk, run, jump to and from, and perform wing-assisted inclined running on ramps from at least three days of age (DoA) [30]. The increase in early life voluntary exercise has been shown to improve adult hippocampal neurogenesis and spatial memory in rodents [31][32][33], humans [34,35] and fish [36][37][38]. ...

This is the way: The effect of artificial cues on early life ramp use behaviour of laying hen chicks
  • Citing Article
  • February 2023

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

... Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology has been widely adopted as a viable approach for identifying and tracking the movement of individual animals in agricultural production systems, both within scientific studies and commercial systems [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The low cost and the small size of on-animal devices makes this technology a versatile solution for investigating how animals access resources and use areas within a production system. ...

Validation of a Radio frequency identification system for tracking location of laying hens in a commercial aviary
  • Citing Preprint
  • February 2023

... However, Vits et al. (2005) stated that keel bone damage increased as cage density increased. In another study, it was reported that sternum fractures were more common in high cage densities due to movement restriction (Montalcini et al., 2023). There are also studies arguing that the effect of cage density on keel bone damage is insignificant (Abrahamsson, 1993;Habig et al., 2013). ...

Intra-individual variation of hen movements is associated with later keel bone fractures in a quasi-commercial aviary

... Clustering is among the most significant aberrant behaviors exhibited by birds, primarily in poultry farming systems devoid of cages [50]. Clustering is recognized as one of the predominant causes of mortality in free-range poultry farming systems (26% of occurrences), followed by cannibalism (6.2% of cases) [51]. ...

Piling behaviour in British layer flocks: Observations and farmers` experiences
  • Citing Article
  • August 2022

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

... The results of the discussed experiment confirm the hypothesis that well-prepared on-farm hatching (stable temperature and humidity parameters, floor heating) allowed us to obtain hatching results that do not differ from conventional hatcher-hatching, with a visible improvement in chick quality. ''On-farm hatching" usually takes place at a temperature about 3-6°C lower than in the hatcher (van de Ven et al., 2013;De Jong et al., 2020;Giersberg et al., 2021;Boyner et al., 2021;Witjes et al., 2022). This seems beneficial for the chicks' homeostasis because the production of metabolic heat during this period is very high (Lourens et al., 2007;Lis et al., 2011). ...

Effects of on-farm hatching on short term stress indicators, weight gain, and cognitive ability in layer chicks
  • Citing Article
  • July 2022

Applied Animal Behaviour Science