Michael G. Cedars’s research while affiliated with Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Advancement of the Midface Using Distraction Techniques
  • Article

March 1999

·

16 Reads

·

114 Citations

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Michael G. Cedars

·

Donald L. Linck

·

·

Bryant A. Toth

Fourteen patients underwent Le Fort III midface advancement using distraction techniques. Six have cephalometric documentation extending beyond 1 year postoperatively, and the positions of cephalometric points A and orbitale over time are reported here. Excellent stability of advancement at the occlusal level and some relapse at the level of orbitale are documented. Elimination or diminution of obstructive sleep apnea occurred in all patients so affected, and one of two patients with tracheostomy has been decannulated. Speech effects have been mild or transient. No untoward effects on extraocular muscle function have occurred.


Distraction Osteogenesis and Its Application to the Midface and Bony Orbit in Craniosynostosis Syndromes

April 1998

·

25 Reads

·

93 Citations

The Journal of craniofacial surgery

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the potential advantages of applying distraction osteogenesis techniques to the correction of orbital and midfacial hypoplasia in craniosynostosis syndromes. Fifteen children with various craniosynostosis syndromes underwent Le Fort III advancement assisted by gradual distraction utilizing a pair of internal distraction devices custom-fabricated for each child. The surgical procedure consisted of a Le Fort III osteotomy, implantation of internal devices with initiation of distraction intraoperatively, and an accelerated rate of midfacial advancement over the next 3 to 5 days. Activation of the distraction hardware was accomplished by a percutaneous pin, which was removed at the end of the distraction protocol, allowing the internal devices to fixate the fragment for a minimum of 6 months during the period of consolidation. With follow-up ranging between 3 to 38 months, the average orbital and midfacial advancement was 19.7 mm (range, 12.0-30.0 mm). Proptosis was lessened and facial proportions significantly improved in all patients. Serious complications were not encountered. The modified distraction protocol utilized in this group of patients was aimed at addressing the unique requirements of pediatric craniofacial surgery, and resulted in almost twice the amount of correction previously reported for traditional rigid fixation techniques.

Citations (2)


... Surgical treatment is primarily aimed at two issues namely, prevention of cerebral damage secondary to raised intracranial pressure and morphological correction of mid facial retrusion that could obstruct the airways in addition to exorbitism and ocular damage. 1 Correction of midface retrusion requires large advancements which are better achieved using distraction osteogenesis. The process involves osteotomy at the planned level and fixation of a distractor device. ...

Reference:

Unique mishap following transfacial pin fixated midface distraction and successful management using nasal endoscopy
Distraction Osteogenesis and Its Application to the Midface and Bony Orbit in Craniosynostosis Syndromes
  • Citing Article
  • April 1998

The Journal of craniofacial surgery

... Skeletal changes following midface surgery have been well described [7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, the long-term effects of these bony movements translating to the overlying soft tissues have not been thoroughly investigated. ...

Advancement of the Midface Using Distraction Techniques
  • Citing Article
  • March 1999

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery