Michaël Cadilhac’s research while affiliated with DePaul University and other places

Manipulating downward-closed sets of vectors forms the basis of so-called antichain-based algorithms in verification. In that context, the dimension of the vectors is intimately tied to the size of the input structure to be verified. In this work, we formally analyze the complexity of classical list-based algorithms to manipulate antichains as well as that of Zampuni\'eris's sharing trees and traditional and novel kdtree-based antichain algorithms. In contrast to the existing literature, and to better address the needs of formal verification, our analysis of \kdtree algorithms does not assume that the dimension of the vectors is fixed. Our theoretical results show that kdtrees are asymptotically better than both list- and sharing-tree-based algorithms, as an antichain data structure, when the antichains become exponentially larger than the dimension of the vectors. We evaluate this on applications in the synthesis of reactive systems from linear-temporal logic and parity-objective specifications, and establish empirically that current benchmarks for these computational tasks do not lead to a favorable situation for current implementations of kdtrees.

We show that for any $i > 0$, it is decidable, given a regular language, whether it is expressible in the $\Sigma_i[<]$ fragment of first-order logic FO[<]. This settles a question open since 1971. Our main technical result relies on the notion of polynomial closure of a class of languages $\mathcal{V}$, that is, finite unions of languages of the form $L_0a_1L_1\cdots a_nL_n$ where each $a_i$ is a letter and each $L_i$ a language of $\mathcal{V}$. We show that if a class $\mathcal{V}$ of regular languages with some closure properties (namely, a positive variety) has a decidable separation problem, then so does its polynomial closure Pol($\mathcal{V}$). The resulting algorithm for Pol($\mathcal{V}$) has time complexity that is exponential in the time complexity for $\mathcal{V}$ and we propose a natural conjecture that would lead to a polynomial time blowup instead. Corollaries include the decidability of half levels of the dot-depth hierarchy and the group-based concatenation hierarchy.

Ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs) are a fundamental data structure for the manipulation of Boolean functions, with strong applications to finite-state symbolic model checking. OBDDs allow for efficient algorithms using top-down dynamic programming. From an automata-theoretic perspective, OBDDs essentially are minimal deterministic finite automata recognizing languages whose words have a fixed length (the arity of the Boolean function). We introduce weakly acyclic diagrams (WADs), a generalization of OBDDs that maintains their algorithmic advantages, but can also represent infinite languages. We develop the theory of WADs and show that they can be used for symbolic model checking of various models of infinite-state systems.

We report on the last four editions of the reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP 2018–2021). We briefly describe the evaluation scheme and the experimental setup of SYNTCOMP. Then we introduce new benchmark classes that have been added to the SYNTCOMP library and give an overview of the participants of SYNTCOMP. Finally, we present and analyze the results of our experimental evaluations, including a ranking of tools with respect to quantity and quality—that is, the total size in terms of logic and memory elements—of solutions.

We describe our implementation of downset-manipulating algorithms used to solve the realizability problem for linear temporal logic (LTL). These algorithms were introduced by Filiot et al. in the 2010s and implemented in the tools Acacia and Acacia+ in C and Python. We identify degrees of freedom in the original algorithms and provide a complete rewriting of Acacia in C++20 articulated around genericity and leveraging modern techniques for better performance. These techniques include compile-time specialization of the algorithms, the use of SIMD registers to store vectors, and several preprocessing steps, some relying on efficient Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) libraries. We also explore different data structures to store downsets. The resulting tool is competitive against comparable modern tools.

In this paper, the regular languages of wire linear AC0$\hbox {AC}^0$are characterized as the languages expressible in the two-variable fragment of first-order logic with regular predicates, FO2[reg]$\mathrm{FO}^2[\mathrm{reg}]$. Additionally, they are characterized as the languages recognized by the algebraic class QLDA$\mathbf {QLDA}$. The class is shown to be decidable and examples of languages in and outside of it are presented.

We report on the last four editions of the reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP 2018-2021). We briefly describe the evaluation scheme and the experimental setup of SYNTCOMP. Then, we introduce new benchmark classes that have been added to the SYNTCOMP library and give an overview of the participants of SYNTCOMP. Finally, we present and analyze the results of our experimental evaluations, including a ranking of tools with respect to quantity and quality - that is, the total size in terms of logic and memory elements - of solutions.

We describe our implementation of downset-manipulating algorithms used to solve the realizability problem for linear temporal logic (LTL). These algorithms were introduced by Filiot et al.~in the 2010s and implemented in the tools Acacia and Acacia+ in C and Python. We identify degrees of freedom in the original algorithms and provide a complete rewriting of Acacia in C++20 articulated around genericity and leveraging modern techniques for better performances. These techniques include compile-time specialization of the algorithms, the use of SIMD registers to store vectors, and several preprocessing steps, some relying on efficient Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) libraries. We also explore different data structures to store downsets. The resulting tool is competitive against comparable modern tools.

The regular languages with a neutral letter expressible in first-order logic with one alternation are characterized. Specifically, it is shown that if an arbitrary $\Sigma_2$ formula defines a regular language with a neutral letter, then there is an equivalent $\Sigma_2$ formula that only uses the order predicate. This shows that the so-called Central Conjecture of Straubing holds for $\Sigma_2$ over languages with a neutral letter, the first progress on the Conjecture in more than 20 years. To show the characterization, lower bounds against polynomial-size depth-3 Boolean circuits with constant top fan-in are developed. The heart of the combinatorial argument resides in studying how positions within a language are determined from one another, a technique of independent interest.