Megan Morley’s research while affiliated with Purdue University System and other places

This study explores the complex interplay of personal attitudes, community dynamics, and societal influences on breastfeeding experiences among women in Florence, Italy. Twenty-four women, aged 25 to 62, participated in comprehensive, 60-minute, in-person interviews conducted in May and June 2023. Four central themes emerged: 1) personal experiences, opinions, and attitudes, 2) communities involved in breastfeeding, 3) public opinion and culture, and 4) breastfeeding alternatives. Participants shared both emotional challenges and benefits, such as bonding and health advantages, while navigating the practical and social complexities of breastfeeding. Community support, including input from healthcare providers, midwives, and family networks, was crucial but varied in quality, sometimes offering encouragement and at other times presenting challenges. The findings highlight the individualized nature of breastfeeding durations, shaped by each mother’s unique motivations and societal expectations. This study emphasizes the need for tailored support, public education, and comprehensive resources to foster positive breastfeeding experiences. The research advocates for policy and programmatic efforts that recognize and respect the diverse needs of mothers, promoting a supportive environment amid cultural and societal pressures.

Period poverty, characterized by inadequate access to menstrual health resources and education, detrimentally affects school attendance, academic performance, and individual health. Recent studies have revealed nearly one-fifth of college-enrolled women experienced period poverty in the past year, highlighting the urgency of addressing this issue. Through our study at Purdue University, we evaluated the effectiveness of a free pad and tampon program aimed at reducing period poverty. Findings from our survey, which included responses from 766 university student participants, revealed many utilized the program due to not having products with them (43.2%). In contrast, others cited early or late periods (33.4%) and financial constraints (5.2%) as reasons for usage. In addition, 81.7% of respondents reported they were aware of the program’s existence, indicating a need for more tailored promotional efforts to reach the entire student body. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the program’s impact and provide actionable recommendations for improving accessibility and addressing the diverse needs of menstruating individuals within the university community. Leveraging these findings, university administrators can play a vital role in advancing menstrual equity initiatives and fostering supportive environments for all menstruators on campus.