Maurice Jamieson’s research while affiliated with University of Edinburgh and other places

Whilst RISC-V has grown phenomenally quickly in embedded computing, it is yet to gain significant traction in High Performance Computing (HPC). However, as we move further into the exascale era, the flexibility offered by RISC-V has the potential to be very beneficial in future supercomputers especially as the community places an increased emphasis on decarbonising its workloads. Sophon's SG2042 is the first mass produced, commodity available, high-core count RISC-V CPU designed for high performance workloads. First released in summer 2023, and at the time of writing now becoming widely available, a key question is whether this is a realistic proposition for HPC applications. In this paper we use NASA's NAS Parallel Benchmark (NPB) suite to characterise performance of the SG2042 against other CPUs implementing the RISC-V, x86-64, and AArch64 ISAs. We find that the SG2042 consistently outperforms all other RISC-V solutions, delivering between a 2.6 and 16.7 performance improvement at the single core level. When compared against the x86-64 and AArch64 CPUs, which are commonplace for high performance workloads, we find that the SG2042 performs comparatively well with computationally bound algorithms but decreases in relative performance when the algorithms are memory bandwidth or latency bound. Based on this work, we identify that performance of the SG2042's memory subsystem is the greatest bottleneck.

The Sophon SG2042 is the world's first commodity 64-core RISC-V CPU for high performance workloads and an important question is whether the SG2042 has the potential to encourage the HPC community to embrace RISC-V. In this paper we undertaking a performance exploration of the SG2042 against existing RISC-V hardware and high performance x86 CPUs in use by modern supercomputers. Leveraging the RAJAPerf benchmarking suite, we discover that on average, the SG2042 delivers, per core, between five and ten times the performance compared to the nearest widely available RISC-V hardware. We found that, on average, the x86 high performance CPUs under test outperform the SG2042 by between four and eight times for multi-threaded workloads, although some individual kernels do perform faster on the SG2042. The result of this work is a performance study that not only contrasts this new RISC-V CPU against existing technologies, but furthermore shares performance best practice.

Leveraging vectorisation, the ability for a CPU to apply operations to multiple elements of data concurrently, is critical for high performance workloads. However, at the time of writing, commercially available physical RISC-V hardware that provides the RISC-V vector extension (RVV) only supports version 0.7.1, which is incompatible with the latest ratified version 1.0. The challenge is that upstream compiler toolchains, such as Clang, only target the ratified v1.0 and do not support the older v0.7.1. Because v1.0 is not compatible with v0.7.1, the only way to program vectorised code is to use a vendor-provided, older compiler. In this paper we introduce the rvv-rollback tool which translates assembly code generated by the compiler using vector extension v1.0 instructions to v0.7.1. We utilise this tool to compare vectorisation performance of the vendor-provided GNU 8.4 compiler (supports v0.7.1) against LLVM 15.0 (supports only v1.0), where we found that the LLVM compiler is capable of auto-vectorising more computational kernels, and delivers greater performance than GNU in most, but not all, cases. We also tested LLVM vectorisation with vector length agnostic and specific settings, and observed cases with significant difference in performance.KeywordsRISC-V vector extensionHPCClangRVV Rollback

Whilst the RISC-V Vector extension (RVV) has been ratified, at the time of writing both hardware implementations and open source software support are still limited for vectorisation on RISC-V. This is important because vectorisation is crucial to obtaining good performance for High Performance Computing (HPC) workloads and, as of April 2023, the Allwinner D1 SoC, containing the XuanTie C906 processor, is the only mass-produced and commercially available hardware supporting RVV. This paper surveys the current state of RISC-V vectorisation as of 2023, reporting the landscape of both the hardware and software ecosystem. Driving our discussion from experiences in setting up the Allwinner D1 as part of the EPCC RISC-V testbed, we report the results of benchmarking the Allwinner D1 using the RAJA Performance Suite, which demonstrated reasonable vectorisation speedup using vendor-provided compiler, as well as favourable performance compared to the StarFive VisionFive V2 with SiFive’s U74 processor.

Vipera provides a compiler and runtime framework for implementing dynamic Domain-Specific Languages on micro-core architectures. The performance and code size of the generated code is critical on these architectures. In this paper we present the results of our investigations into the efficiency of Vipera in terms of code performance and size.KeywordsDomain-specific languagesPythonnative code generationRISC-Vmicro-core architectures

Funded by the UK ExCALIBUR H\&ES exascale programme, in early 2022 a RISC-V testbed for HPC was stood up to provide free access for scientific software developers to experiment with RISC-V for their workloads. Here we report on successes, challenges, and lessons learnt from this activity with a view to better understanding the suitability of RISC-V for HPC and important areas to focus RISC-V HPC community efforts upon.