January 2024
·
24 Reads
Parks Stewardship Forum
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
January 2024
·
24 Reads
Parks Stewardship Forum
January 2023
·
739 Reads
·
31 Citations
Nature
Living amphibians (Lissamphibia) include frogs and salamanders (Batrachia) and the limbless worm-like caecilians (Gymnophiona). The estimated Palaeozoic era gymnophionan–batrachian molecular divergence¹ suggests a major gap in the record of crown lissamphibians prior to their earliest fossil occurrences in the Triassic period2–6. Recent studies find a monophyletic Batrachia within dissorophoid temnospondyls7–10, but the absence of pre-Jurassic period caecilian fossils11,12 has made their relationships to batrachians and affinities to Palaeozoic tetrapods controversial1,8,13,14. Here we report the geologically oldest stem caecilian—a crown lissamphibian from the Late Triassic epoch of Arizona, USA—extending the caecilian record by around 35 million years. These fossils illuminate the tempo and mode of early caecilian morphological and functional evolution, demonstrating a delayed acquisition of musculoskeletal features associated with fossoriality in living caecilians, including the dual jaw closure mechanism15,16, reduced orbits¹⁷ and the tentacular organ¹⁸. The provenance of these fossils suggests a Pangaean equatorial origin for caecilians, implying that living caecilian biogeography reflects conserved aspects of caecilian function and physiology¹⁹, in combination with vicariance patterns driven by plate tectonics²⁰. These fossils reveal a combination of features that is unique to caecilians alongside features that are shared with batrachian and dissorophoid temnospondyls, providing new and compelling evidence supporting a single origin of living amphibians within dissorophoid temnospondyls.
October 2020
·
120 Reads
·
23 Citations
Acaenasuchus geoffreyi is a diminutive armored archosaur from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation of northern Arizona, U.S.A., with uncertain evolutionary relationships and skeletal maturity. Known only from osteoderms, the taxon has been considered a valid taxon of aetosaur, juvenile specimens synonymous with the aetosaur Desmatosuchus spurensis, or a non-aetosaurian pseudosuchian archosaur. Here, we describe new fossils of Acaenasuchus geoffreyi that represent cranial, vertebral, and appendicular elements as well as previously unknown variations in the dorsal carapace and ventral shield. The skull bones are ornamented with the same anastomosing complex of ridges and grooves found on the paramedian and lateral osteoderms, and the appendicular skeleton resembles that of Revueltosaurus callenderi, Euscolosuchus olseni, aetosaurs, and other armored archosaurs such as erpetosuchids. Histology of osteoderms from the hypodigm of Acaenasuchus geoffreyi shows multiple growth lines, laminar tissue, and low vascularity, evidence that the individuals were close to skeletal maturity and not young juveniles. A revised phylogenetic analysis of early archosaurs recovers Acaenasuchus geoffreyi and Euscolosuchus olseni as sister taxa and members of a new clade that is the sister taxon of Aetosauria. This new phylogeny depicts a broader distribution of osteoderm character states previously thought to only occur in aetosaurs, demonstrating the danger of using only armor character states in aetosaur taxonomy and phylogeny. Acaenasuchus geoffreyi is also a good example of how new fossils can stabilize 'wild card' taxa in phylogenetic analyses and contributes to our understanding of the evolution of the aetosaur carapace.
October 2020
·
13 Reads
June 2019
·
16 Reads
January 2019
·
19 Reads
October 2018
·
20 Reads
October 2016
·
53 Reads
·
2 Citations
... . The phylogenetic hypotheses are disparate, many issued from phylogenetic analyses that need substantial revision (Gee, 2022;Marjanovi c & Laurin, 2019). However, the known earliest fossil occurrences of the evolutionary lineages represented today by the three clades of extant amphibians (Kligman et al., 2023;Schoch et al., 2020;Stocker et al., 2019) and time-calibrated phylogenies (e.g., Jetz & Pyron, 2018) attest that by the Triassic these lineages had separate evolutionary histories. ...
January 2023
Nature
... However, all the examined specimens are fragmented and not fully preserved, and W:L ratio was estimated from restored drawings. The anatomical description of these osteoderms and the terminology used follow Desojo et al. (2013), Haldar et al. (2023), Lucas (1999, 2000), Long and Ballew (1985), Long and Murry (1995), Marsh et al. (2020), Parker (2007, 2008 and Reyes et al. (2024). The convention for naming the aetosaurian osteoderm based on its position on the carapace is after Parker (2016b) and Haldar et al. (2023). ...
October 2020