Matthew Smith’s research while affiliated with Resource Management and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (8)


New perspectives on NPS paleontological resource stewardship: Scientific, curatorial, and educational outcomes at Petrified Forest National Park
  • Article

January 2024

·

24 Reads

Parks Stewardship Forum

·

·

Matthew E. Smith

·

[...]

·

Diana M. Boudreau

Digital renderings of holotype, paratype, and referred specimens of F. gilmorei
a–c, Composite reconstruction of craniomandibular elements in lateral (a), medial (b) and dorsal (c) views. d,e, Holotype right pseudodentary (PEFO 43891) in medial and ventral views. f, Paratype right pseudodentary (PEFO 46284) in medial view. g–i, Referred left maxillopalatine (PEFO 46481) in medial (g), ventral (h) and dorsal (i) views. j,k, Referred left pseudoangular (PEFO 46480) in medial and lateral views. l–o, Paratype right pseudodentary (PEFO 45800) in medial (l; expanded view in m) and dorsal (n; expanded view in o) views. abcnV, alveolar branch cranial nerve V; adtr, adsymphyseal tooth row; af, adductor fossa; att, attachment tissue; bp, basal pore; cnV, cranial nerve V insertions; cp, coronoid process; dpaf, dorsal pseudoangular facet; dpdf, dorsal pseudodentary facet; dtr, dentary tooth row; dz, dividing zone; ebcnV, external branch cranial nerve V; fr, facial ramus; hp, hamate process; imf, intramandibular foramen; jas, jaw articulation surface; lcm, lateral choanal margin; lecnV, lateral exit cranial nerve V; mtr, maxillary tooth row; om, orbital margin; pap, posterior pseudoangular process; pc, pulp cavity; pd, pedicel; pgp, preglenoid process; ptr, palatal tooth row; rtl, replacement tooth locus; sf, symphyseal foramen; sp, symphyseal prongs; vpaf, ventral pseudoangular facet; vpdf, ventral pseudodentary facet. Arrows indicate anterior direction.
Spatiotemporal history of Lissamphibia and Gymnophionomorpha
a, Biogeographic history of Gymnophionomorpha and Triassic batrachians; yellow indicates living caecilian distribution. b, Time-calibrated topology of lissamphibian relationships showing major divergences (topology derived from refs. 6,23,38). Estimated molecular divergence dates for major divergences are shown as blue circles (Gymnophionomopha–Batrachia divergence without Gerobatrachus calibration; Supplementary Table 4), pink circles (Gymnophionomopha–Batrachia divergence with Gerobatrachus calibration; Supplementary Table 5), yellow circles (Salientia–Caudata divergence; Supplementary Table 6) and green circles (Rhinatrematidae–Stegokrotaphia divergence; Supplementary Table 7); coloured vertical bars show the average for each set of divergence estimates. Numbered white and orange circles correspond to occurrences in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Crosses indicate extinct taxa.
Evolutionary history of the lissamphibian mandibular ramus
Squares denote important apomorphies (including non-mandibular features); apomorphies are optimized computationally unless followed by an asterisk, which denotes an apomorphy suggested by our results but lacking sufficient sampling to optimize computationally. Topology is derived from parsimony results (Extended Data Fig. 5); Yaksha peretti, Salamandra and Rana approximate conditions are found in taxa sampled in the analysis. Illustrations represent right mandibles in medial (bottom) and dorsal (top) views for Doleserpeton annectens⁹, Eocaecilia micropodia¹² (Illustration adapted from ref. ¹², with the permission of Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University), Epicrionops petersi¹², Funcusvermis gilmorei, Rana, Salamandra and Y. peretti²⁸, excepting Greererpeton burkemorani³⁵ (dorsal only) and Cacops aspidephorus³⁷ (medial only). All scale bars are 2 mm except for G. burkemorani (2 cm) and C. aspidephorus (2 cm). Brackets on the branches indicate stem groups, whereas circles indicate node groups. Crosses indicate extinct taxa.
Triassic stem caecilian supports dissorophoid origin of living amphibians
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2023

·

739 Reads

·

31 Citations

Nature

Living amphibians (Lissamphibia) include frogs and salamanders (Batrachia) and the limbless worm-like caecilians (Gymnophiona). The estimated Palaeozoic era gymnophionan–batrachian molecular divergence¹ suggests a major gap in the record of crown lissamphibians prior to their earliest fossil occurrences in the Triassic period2–6. Recent studies find a monophyletic Batrachia within dissorophoid temnospondyls7–10, but the absence of pre-Jurassic period caecilian fossils11,12 has made their relationships to batrachians and affinities to Palaeozoic tetrapods controversial1,8,13,14. Here we report the geologically oldest stem caecilian—a crown lissamphibian from the Late Triassic epoch of Arizona, USA—extending the caecilian record by around 35 million years. These fossils illuminate the tempo and mode of early caecilian morphological and functional evolution, demonstrating a delayed acquisition of musculoskeletal features associated with fossoriality in living caecilians, including the dual jaw closure mechanism15,16, reduced orbits¹⁷ and the tentacular organ¹⁸. The provenance of these fossils suggests a Pangaean equatorial origin for caecilians, implying that living caecilian biogeography reflects conserved aspects of caecilian function and physiology¹⁹, in combination with vicariance patterns driven by plate tectonics²⁰. These fossils reveal a combination of features that is unique to caecilians alongside features that are shared with batrachian and dissorophoid temnospondyls, providing new and compelling evidence supporting a single origin of living amphibians within dissorophoid temnospondyls.

Download

Skeletal Anatomy of Acaenasuchus Geoffreyi Long and Murry, 1995 (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) and its Implications for the Origin of the Aetosaurian Carapace

October 2020

·

120 Reads

·

23 Citations

Acaenasuchus geoffreyi is a diminutive armored archosaur from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation of northern Arizona, U.S.A., with uncertain evolutionary relationships and skeletal maturity. Known only from osteoderms, the taxon has been considered a valid taxon of aetosaur, juvenile specimens synonymous with the aetosaur Desmatosuchus spurensis, or a non-aetosaurian pseudosuchian archosaur. Here, we describe new fossils of Acaenasuchus geoffreyi that represent cranial, vertebral, and appendicular elements as well as previously unknown variations in the dorsal carapace and ventral shield. The skull bones are ornamented with the same anastomosing complex of ridges and grooves found on the paramedian and lateral osteoderms, and the appendicular skeleton resembles that of Revueltosaurus callenderi, Euscolosuchus olseni, aetosaurs, and other armored archosaurs such as erpetosuchids. Histology of osteoderms from the hypodigm of Acaenasuchus geoffreyi shows multiple growth lines, laminar tissue, and low vascularity, evidence that the individuals were close to skeletal maturity and not young juveniles. A revised phylogenetic analysis of early archosaurs recovers Acaenasuchus geoffreyi and Euscolosuchus olseni as sister taxa and members of a new clade that is the sister taxon of Aetosauria. This new phylogeny depicts a broader distribution of osteoderm character states previously thought to only occur in aetosaurs, demonstrating the danger of using only armor character states in aetosaur taxonomy and phylogeny. Acaenasuchus geoffreyi is also a good example of how new fossils can stabilize 'wild card' taxa in phylogenetic analyses and contributes to our understanding of the evolution of the aetosaur carapace.






Citations (2)


... . The phylogenetic hypotheses are disparate, many issued from phylogenetic analyses that need substantial revision (Gee, 2022;Marjanovi c & Laurin, 2019). However, the known earliest fossil occurrences of the evolutionary lineages represented today by the three clades of extant amphibians (Kligman et al., 2023;Schoch et al., 2020;Stocker et al., 2019) and time-calibrated phylogenies (e.g., Jetz & Pyron, 2018) attest that by the Triassic these lineages had separate evolutionary histories. ...

Reference:

Báez & Nicoli. 2025. Re‐examination of the oldest known frog from South America New data prompt new evolutionary interpretations
Triassic stem caecilian supports dissorophoid origin of living amphibians

Nature

... However, all the examined specimens are fragmented and not fully preserved, and W:L ratio was estimated from restored drawings. The anatomical description of these osteoderms and the terminology used follow Desojo et al. (2013), Haldar et al. (2023), Lucas (1999, 2000), Long and Ballew (1985), Long and Murry (1995), Marsh et al. (2020), Parker (2007, 2008 and Reyes et al. (2024). The convention for naming the aetosaurian osteoderm based on its position on the carapace is after Parker (2016b) and Haldar et al. (2023). ...

Skeletal Anatomy of Acaenasuchus Geoffreyi Long and Murry, 1995 (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) and its Implications for the Origin of the Aetosaurian Carapace
  • Citing Article
  • October 2020