Masayuki Matsumoto’s research while affiliated with University of Tsukuba and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (9)


Figure 1. Cued lottery task, monkeys' choice behavior, and neural coding of
A neuronal prospect theory model in the brain reward circuitry
  • Preprint
  • File available

December 2021

·

65 Reads

Yuri Imaizumi

·

·

·

[...]

·

Prospect theory, arguably the most prominent theory of choice, is an obvious candidate for neural valuation models. How the activity of individual neurons, a possible computational unit, reflects prospect theory remains unknown. Here, we show with theoretical accuracy equivalent to that of human neuroimaging studies that single-neuron activity in four core reward-related cortical and subcortical regions represents the subjective valuation of risky gambles in monkeys. The activity of individual neurons in monkeys passively viewing a lottery reflects the desirability of probabilistic rewards, parameterized as a multiplicative combination of a utility and probability weighting functions in the prospect theory framework. The diverse patterns of valuation signals were not localized but distributed throughout most parts of the reward circuitry. A network model aggregating these signals reliably reconstructed risk preferences and subjective probability perceptions revealed by the animals' choices. Thus, distributed neural coding explains the computation of subjective valuations under risk.

Download

Single-unit Recording in Awake Behaving Non-human Primates

April 2021

·

27 Reads

·

2 Citations

BIO-PROTOCOL

Non-human primates (NHPs) have been widely used as a species model in studies to understand higher brain functions in health and disease. These studies employ specifically designed behavioral tasks in which animal behavior is well-controlled, and record neuronal activity at high spatial and temporal resolutions while animals are performing the tasks. Here, we present a detailed procedure to conduct single-unit recording, which fulfils high spatial and temporal resolutions while macaque monkeys (i.e., widely used NHPs) perform behavioral tasks in a well-controlled manner. This procedure was used in our previous study to investigate the dynamics of neuronal activity during economic decision-making by the monkeys. Monkeys' behavior was quantitated by eye position tracking and button press/release detection. By inserting a microelectrode into the brain, with a grid system in reference to magnetic resonance imaging, we precisely recorded the brain regions. Our experimental system permits rigorous investigation of the link between neuronal activity and behavior.




Neural Population Dynamics Underlying Expected Value Computation

January 2021

·

91 Reads

·

20 Citations

The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience

Computation of expected values (i.e., probability × magnitude) seems to be a dynamic integrative process performed by the brain for efficient economic behavior. However, neural dynamics underlying this computation is largely unknown. Using lottery tasks in monkeys ( Macaca mulatta , male; Macaca fuscata , female), we examined (1) whether four core reward-related brain regions detect and integrate probability and magnitude cued by numerical symbols and (2) whether these brain regions have distinct dynamics in the integrative process. Extraction of the mechanistic structure of neural population signals demonstrated that expected value signals simultaneously arose in the central orbitofrontal cortex (cOFC; medial part of area 13) and ventral striatum (VS). Moreover, these signals were incredibly stable compared with weak and/or fluctuating signals in the dorsal striatum and medial OFC. Temporal dynamics of these stable expected value signals were unambiguously distinct: sharp and gradual signal evolutions in the cOFC and VS, respectively. These intimate dynamics suggest that the cOFC and VS compute the expected values with unique time constants, as distinct, partially overlapping processes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our results differ from those of earlier studies suggesting that many reward-related regions in the brain signal probability and/or magnitude and provide a mechanistic structure for expected value computation employed in multiple neural populations. A central part of the orbitofrontal cortex (cOFC) and ventral striatum (VS) can simultaneously detect and integrate probability and magnitude into an expected value. Our empirical study on these neural population dynamics raises a possibility that the cOFC and VS cooperate on this computation with unique time constants as distinct, partially overlapping processes.


Tonic firing mode of midbrain dopamine neurons continuously tracks reward values changing moment-by-moment

September 2020

·

38 Reads

·

1 Citation

Appropriate actions are taken based on the values of future rewards. The phasic activity of midbrain dopamine neurons signals these values. Because reward values often change over time, even on a subsecond-by-subsecond basis, appropriate action selection requires continuous value monitoring. However, the phasic dopamine activity, which is sporadic and has a short duration, likely fails continuous monitoring. Here, we demonstrate a tonic firing mode of dopamine neurons that effectively tracks changing reward values. We recorded dopamine neuron activity in monkeys during a Pavlovian procedure in which the value of a cued reward gradually increased or decreased. Dopamine neurons tonically increased and decreased their activity as the reward value changed. This tonic activity was evoked more strongly by non-burst spikes than burst spikes producing a conventional phasic activity. Our findings suggest that dopamine neurons change their firing mode to effectively signal reward values, which could underlie action selection in changing environments.


Fig. 2. Dopamine and OFC neurons representing value and/or choice during economic decision-making. (A to F) Activity of six example neurons [(A to C) dopamine neurons; (D to F) OFC neurons]. Top: Spike density functions (SDFs) aligned at the onset of the first object. The SDFs are shown for each object value (red, value 6; pink, value 5; yellow, value 4; light blue, value 3; blue, value 2; dark blue, value 1) and for chosen (solid curves) and unchosen trials (dotted curves). Gray horizontal bars indicate the time window to calculate the magnitude of neuronal activity. Bottom: Magnitude of neuronal activity plotted against the object value shown for chosen (filled circles) and unchosen trials (open circles). Gray plots showed the baseline activity (−500 to 0 ms) for each value condition. Error bars indicate SEM.
Fig. 4. Proportions and averaged activities of value-modulated, intermediate, and choice-modulated neurons. (A and B) Left: Proportions of identified neurons (i.e., value-modulated, intermediate, and choice-modulated neurons) and non-identified neurons. Right: Proportions of value-modulated, intermediate, and choicemodulated neurons among all the identified neurons. These proportions are shown for dopamine neurons (n = 96) (A) and OFC neurons (n = 263) (B). (C) Comparison of the proportions of value-modulated, intermediate, and choice-modulated neurons between dopamine (open bars) and OFC neurons (filled bars). n.s. indicates no significant difference (P > 0.05, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). (D and E) Averaged magnitudes of value-modulated (left), intermediate (middle), and choice-modulated neuron activities (right) shown for dopamine neurons (n = 38, 52, and 32, respectively) (D) and OFC neurons (n = 54, 54, and 34, respectively) (E). Note that the OFC neurons that positively represented the option's value and/or monkey's choice were used in this analysis (see fig. S2 for OFC neurons that negatively represented the value and/or choice). Conventions are as the bottom panels in Fig. 2 (A to F).
Fig. 5. Temporal dynamics of the dopamine and OFC signals corresponding to the time course of the decision-making process. (A and B) Time-varying proportions of value-modulated (red), intermediate (gray), and choice-modulated neurons (blue) shown for dopamine neurons (n = 96) (A) and OFC neurons (n = 263) (B). Arrowheads represent the onsets of the value-modulated (red), intermediate (gray), and choice-modulated signals (blue). (C and D) Cumulative histograms of the latencies of the value-modulated (red), intermediate (gray), and choice-modulated signals (blue) shown for dopamine neurons (n = 96) (C) and OFC neurons (n = 263) (D). Vertical dotted lines indicate mean latencies, and numbers are means ± SD. Single and double asterisks indicate a significant difference between the latencies (P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively, two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test). (E and F) Comparison of the R 2 between the value model (y axis) and the choice model (x axis) in dopamine neurons (n = 96) (E) and OFC neurons (n = 263) (F). Each panel indicates the R 2 for each 100-ms time bin. Pink lines indicate linear regression lines. Red, gray, and blue circles indicate the example neurons shown in Fig. 2 (A and D, B and E, and C and F, respectively). (G and H) Regression slopes calculated for each time bin in dopamine (G) and OFC neurons (H).
Fig. 6. Onsets of the choice-modulated signal and monkey's choice behavior. (A and C) Averaged SDFs of choice-modulated dopamine neurons (n = 31) (A) and OFC neurons (n = 34) (C) aligned at the onset of the first object shown for chosen trials (blue) and unchosen trials (gray) under the condition in which "object value = 4". One choice-modulated dopamine neuron was excluded from this analysis because the monkey chose the first object associated with the value 4 in all trials during the recording session, and, consequently, we were unable to collect data in unchosen trials. (B and D) Averaged SDFs of the same choice-modulated dopamine neurons (n = 31) (B) and OFC neurons (n = 34) (D) aligned at the onset of the button release. Shaded areas around the curves indicate SEM. Vertical dotted lines and numbers indicate the time when the difference in the averaged firing rate between chosen and unchosen trials became significant (P < 0.05, one-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test).
Fig. 7. Neuronal modulation evoked by the button release in the control task. (A) Control task. (B) Latency of the button release in monkey A (n = 182 sessions) and monkey E (n = 165 sessions) in the control task. (C and E) Averaged SDFs of the choice-modulated dopamine neurons (n = 20) (C) and OFC neurons (n = 34) (E) aligned at the onset of the button release in the control task. Shaded areas around the curves indicate SEM. Horizontal white and blue bars indicate the time windows used to calculate the baseline firing rate (−400 to −200 ms) and the firing rate around the onset of the button release (−200 to 200 ms) of each neuron, respectively. (D and F) Comparison between the baseline firing rate and the firing rate around the onset of the button release in the control task for the 20 choice-modulated dopamine neurons (D) and the 34 choice-modulated OFC neurons (F). Each gray line indicates the data obtained from each neuron. Double asterisk indicates a significant difference between the firing rates (P < 0.01, two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test). n.s. indicates no significant difference (P > 0.05, two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Error bars indicate SEM.
Signal dynamics of midbrain dopamine neurons during economic decision-making in monkeys

July 2020

·

187 Reads

·

22 Citations

Science Advances

When we make economic choices, the brain first evaluates available options and then decides whether to choose them. Midbrain dopamine neurons are known to reinforce economic choices through their signal evoked by outcomes after decisions are made. However, although critical internal processing is executed while decisions are being made, little is known about the role of dopamine neurons during this period. We found that dopamine neurons exhibited dynamically changing signals related to the internal processing while rhesus monkeys were making decisions. These neurons encoded the value of an option immediately after it was offered and then gradually changed their activity to represent the animal’s upcoming choice. Similar dynamics were observed in the orbitofrontal cortex, a center for economic decision-making, but the value-to-choice signal transition was completed earlier in dopamine neurons. Our findings suggest that dopamine neurons are a key component of the neural network that makes choices from values during ongoing decision-making processes.


Abbreviated title: Neural dynamics for expected value computation 5 6
Neural population dynamics underlying expected value computation

June 2020

·

118 Reads

Computation of expected values, i.e., probability times magnitude, seems to be a dynamic integrative process performed in the brain for efficient economic behavior. However, neural dynamics underlying this computation remain largely unknown. We examined (1) whether four core reward-related regions detect and integrate the probability and magnitude cued by numerical symbols and (2) whether these regions have different dynamics in the integrative process. Extractions of mechanistic structure of neural population signal demonstrated that expected-value signals simultaneously arose in central part of orbitofrontal cortex (cOFC, area 13m) and ventral striatum (VS). These expected-value signals were incredibly stable in contrast to weak and unstable signals in dorsal striatum and medial OFC. Notably, temporal dynamics of these stable expected-value signals were unambiguously distinct: sharp and gradual signal evolutions in cOFC and VS, respectively. These intimate dynamics suggest that cOFC and VS compute the expected-values with unique time constants, as distinct, partially overlapping processes.


Primate Nigrostriatal Dopamine System Regulates Saccadic Response Inhibition

November 2018

·

37 Reads

·

30 Citations

Neuron

Animals need to inhibit inappropriate actions that would lead to unwanted outcomes. Although this ability, called response inhibition, is impaired in neurological/psychiatric disorders with dopaminergic dysfunctions, how dopamine regulates response inhibition remains unclear. Here we investigated neuronal signals of the nigrostriatal dopamine system in monkeys performing a saccadic countermanding task. Subsets of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra and striatal neurons receiving the dopaminergic input were activated when the monkey was required to cancel a planned saccadic eye movement. These activations were stronger when canceling the eye movements was successful compared with failed and were enhanced in demanding trials. The activated dopamine neurons were distributed mainly in the dorsolateral, but not in the ventromedial, part of the nigra. Furthermore, pharmacological blockade of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the striatum dampened the performance of canceling saccadic eye movements. The present findings indicate that disruption of nigrostriatal dopamine signaling causes impairments in response inhibition.

Citations (5)


... We developed an economic decision-making task in which monkeys decided whether to choose an offered option (Materials and Methods) (27). After they made a decision, either a "counterfactual" or an "actual" outcome was displayed depending on the decision ( Fig. 1) (28). ...

Reference:

Distinct roles of the orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum, and dopamine neurons in counterfactual thinking of decision outcomes
Single-unit Recording in Awake Behaving Non-human Primates
  • Citing Article
  • April 2021

BIO-PROTOCOL

... In a previous study using a choice task, we showed that amygdala neurons do encode subjective values that reflected integrated reward probability and magnitude when these reward attributes were cued simultaneously 12 . Perhaps neurons in the prefrontal cortex, including the orbitofrontal cortex, and parietal cortex might be relatively more important in signaling to accumulate decision variables derived from sequential or otherwise complex cues 28,[63][64][65][66] . Some previous studies found largely similar coding of values and choices in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex 13,67 , while others emphasized differences in the time courses with which neurons in these structures track changing values 53,68 , and in the specificity with which single neurons encode complex, multisensory food rewards 69 . ...

Neural Population Dynamics Underlying Expected Value Computation

The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience

... Kim et al. argued the contrary: the mice being teleported closer to rewards showed a change in the dopaminergic neuron firing pattern, which was better modelled by the prediction error in the temporal difference model, instead of the value [45]. To further support this idea of the prediction idea, the ramp in VTA neuron firing has also been found across studies, indicating that the dopamine ramp at the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is caused by VTA neuron firing [47]. ...

Tonic firing mode of midbrain dopamine neurons continuously tracks reward values changing moment-by-moment

... More recently, Gershman and colleagues (2024) proposed a more comprehensive RPE theory, where DA transients reflect RPEs in response to reward while being updated in accordance with the value decay model. Thereby, these transients drive learning, action selection, motivation and vigour 22,[48][49][50][51] . DA RPE transients in response to learning under various conditions have been well studied. ...

Signal dynamics of midbrain dopamine neurons during economic decision-making in monkeys

Science Advances

... connections, it is plausible that the neurons in cluster 2, which are 601 associated with refusal of selection, may be influenced by inputs from these frontal cortex 602regions. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study that reported intensive modulation of 603 caudate nucleus neuronal activity when monkeys canceled a planned saccade during a stop-604 signal task, which is analogous to a countermanding task(Ogasawara et al., 2018). These605 findings suggest that the striatal neurons in cluster 2 may play a crucial role during the proactive 606 inhibition of actions and contribute to adaptive decisions based on the integration of sensory 607 information and reward-based objectives. ...

Primate Nigrostriatal Dopamine System Regulates Saccadic Response Inhibition
  • Citing Article
  • November 2018

Neuron