Martin Mörsdorf’s research while affiliated with University of Freiburg and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (22)


Overview of how temporal changes of plant diversity effects on community productivity are expected to be related to trait-dependent shifts in species-level overyielding
A Effects of plant diversity strengthen over time as productivity increases more quickly in diverse plant communities. B At early stages, species-level overyielding in diverse plant communities is higher for acquisitive (ΔYA) than for conservative (ΔYC) species. Over time, the overyielding of conservative species (SPConservative) is expected to increase, whereas the overyielding of acquisitive species (SPAcquisitive) is expected either to decrease (solid red line) or increase slightly due to the decreasing performance of monocultures (dotted red line). C Contributions to community overyielding shift over time, from greater overyielding for acquisitive species at early stages to greater overyielding for conservative species at later stages of community development, regardless of whether overyielding of acquisitive species decreases (solid green line) or slightly increases (dashed green line).
Effects of plant species richness on community productivity and community overyielding over time
A, B Effects on community productivity and community overyielding (log response ratio (lnRR) of productivity of a mixture divided by the mean productivity of all monocultures of the component species) in terms of total aboveground biomass (log-10 scale) in grasslands (n = 39). Effects on (C, D) annual basal area increment and (E, F) total accumulated basal area (log-10 scale) in forests (n = 26). Points are community-level values for each plot in the respective year. Lines are mixed effect model fits across all experiments. For grasslands, species richness (F1,1317 = 157.8, P < 0.001), year (F1,5976 = 21.4, P < 0.001), and the species richness × year interaction (F1,5976 = 8.0, P = 0.005) significantly affected aboveground biomass, while species richness (F1,716 = 78.1, P < 0.001) and the species richness × year interaction (F1,3482 = 40.0, P < 0.001) significantly affected community overyielding. In forests, annual basal area increment was significantly affected by year (F1,3474 = 31.9, P < 0.001), and the species richness × year interaction (F1,3474 = 7.6, P = 0.006), while community overyielding was significantly affected by the species richness × year interaction (F1,1934 = 12.6, P < 0.001). Forest accumulated basal area was significantly affected by species richness (F1,1348 = 13.6, P < 0.001), year (F1,4023 = 2229, P < 0.001) and the species richness × year interaction (F1,4023 = 12.6, P < 0.001), while community overyielding was significantly affected by species richness (F1,781 = 4.9, P = 0.027), and the species richness × year interaction (F1,2611 = 19.4, P < 0.001). Reported P values were calculated from one-sided F-tests. Refer to Supplementary Table 2 for more details. Y-axis was trimmed to enhance resolution comparing model fit lines (5% extreme values are not visible).
The contribution of species overyielding to community overyielding in grasslands (n = 39) and forests (n = 26) experimental ecosystems
A The probability density of the proportion of overyielding species (with a positive species lnRR) in overyielding communities over time. Numbers on the left sides of each panel represent experimental years and the numbers in the parentheses represent the proportion of overyielding communities in the corresponding year. The vertical lines indicate the mean values of the proportion of overyielding species in overyielding communities each year. B Box plots showing the proportional contribution of the single highest overyielding species to community-level overyielding (COmax) when less than half of all species overyielded (0, 0.5), more than half of the species overyielded (0.5, 1), or when all species overyielded (1) in overyielding communities across years. Numbers above the boxes show the median COmax for each group. COmax can be larger than 1 when overyielding in some species overcompensates for underyielding in other species, whereas COmax ranges between 0 and 1 when all species overyielded in overyielding communities. Note that the proportional contributions of all species to community-level overyielding add up to 1. For each boxplot, the horizontal lines inside the box represent the median, the lower and upper ends of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the lower and upper whiskers extend from the hinge to the largest and lowest value, respectively.
Species overyielding (or underyielding) in mixed-species communities in relation to plant economics traits across experimental years in grassland and forest experimental ecosystems
A, B The relationship between species log response ratio (lnRR; positive value indicates overyielding and negative value indicates underyielding) of aboveground biomass with plant economics traits (A: Traits PC1; B: Traits PC2) in grasslands (n = 39). C-F The relationship between species lnRR of annual basal area increment with plant economics traits (C, E Traits PC1; D, F Traits PC2), as well as the relationship between species lnRR of accumulated basal area in forests (n = 26). Lines are mixed-effects model fits across experiments (refer to Supplementary Figs. 5-6 for model fits within each experiment). Points represent the lnRR for each species and year in each experiment. Y-axis were trimmed to enhance resolution comparing model fit lines (5% extreme values are not visible). Refer to Table 1 and Supplementary Table 4 for detailed statistical analyses.
Effects of plant diversity on productivity strengthen over time due to trait-dependent shifts in species overyielding
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2024

·

1,674 Reads

·

10 Citations

Liting Zheng

·

·

·

[...]

·

Plant diversity effects on community productivity often increase over time. Whether the strengthening of diversity effects is caused by temporal shifts in species-level overyielding (i.e., higher species-level productivity in diverse communities compared with monocultures) remains unclear. Here, using data from 65 grassland and forest biodiversity experiments, we show that the temporal strength of diversity effects at the community scale is underpinned by temporal changes in the species that yield. These temporal trends of species-level overyielding are shaped by plant ecological strategies, which can be quantitatively delimited by functional traits. In grasslands, the temporal strengthening of biodiversity effects on community productivity was associated with increasing biomass overyielding of resource-conservative species increasing over time, and with overyielding of species characterized by fast resource acquisition either decreasing or increasing. In forests, temporal trends in species overyielding differ when considering above- versus belowground resource acquisition strategies. Overyielding in stem growth decreased for species with high light capture capacity but increased for those with high soil resource acquisition capacity. Our results imply that a diversity of species with different, and potentially complementary, ecological strategies is beneficial for maintaining community productivity over time in both grassland and forest ecosystems.

Download

Climatic condition at the IDENT-Freiburg site. Mean growing season air temperature (MGT) (a) and mean growing season precipitation (MGP) (b) are shown for the normal period 1991–2020. The horizontal gray lines in (a, b) represent the data for the drought year 2018. Relative air humidity (RH) (c) is shown for the growing season (April–October) 2018 (DWD-CDC 2021). Vertical lines indicate our observation periods, defined along the 2018 growing season (pre-drought (PreDr), during peak drought in July 2018 (Dr), in September 2018 (PostDr I) and October 2018 (PostDr II). The volumetric soil moisture content (d) was recorded in 10 cm soil depth, error bars represent one standard error
Aerial view of IDENT-Freiburg, July 2017 and July 2018. Leaf browning in several plots can clearly be seen in the 2018 image
Estimated marginal means of NDVI (a, b), PAI (c, d) and leaf chlorophyll (e, f). Estimated means, including their 95% confidence intervals, are presented for different times in relation to drought 2018: peak drought in July (Dr), post-drought shortly after drought in September (PostDr I) and later after the drought in October (PostDr II). As there were no significant interactions between time in relation to drought and plot-level tree species richness (SR), the SR effects are separately presented in the right figure panel. Different lower case letters indicate statistically significant differences among group means, based on Tukey post hoc comparisons (P < 0.05)
Proportional deviation index (D), in relation to plot-level tree species richness (SR). D values below zero indicate antagonistic species effects on NDVI. The regression model is based on linear mixed effects models, including block and plot as nested, random effects. The shadow behind the regression line represents its 95% CI
Relationship between the proportion of the most drought-affected species Betula and Larix in a plot, and plot-level NDVI. The shadow behind the regression line represents its 95% confidence interval
Quantifying the influence of tree species richness on community drought resistance using drone-derived NDVI and ground-based measures of Plant Area Index and leaf chlorophyll in a young tree diversity experiment

October 2023

·

178 Reads

·

4 Citations

European Journal of Forest Research

Tree diversity may buffer the negative impact of drought events according to the diversity insurance hypothesis. During the extreme pan-European drought of 2018, we tested whether tree species richness modulated drought impacts on communities of a young tree diversity experiment in Freiburg, Germany. We utilized drone-based hyperspectral images to capture early symptoms of drought stress indicated by variation in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and ground-based measures that are indicative of tree canopy function, including Plant Area Index (PAI) and leaf chlorophyll content (Chl). Measures were taken the fifth growing season after planting on six broadleaved and six conifer species originating from Europe and North America in monocultures, two-, four- and six-species mixtures. NDVI decreased successively in response to the summer drought. In contrast to our expectation, tree species richness did not reduce declines in NDVI at the plot level. NDVI values were generally lower in six-species mixtures, compared to monocultures or two-species mixtures, which may be indicative of antagonistic tree species interactions in mixtures of high diversity. Changes in PAI in response to the drought were similar to changes in NDVI; however, modeled differences in PAI between mixtures were not statistically significant. Chl initially decreased, but recovered within a period of two months following the drought. Remotely sensed NDVI facilitated monitoring of the drought response of our large field experiment and could aid in monitoring canopy health in response to extreme drought events. Our observations suggest that NDVI responses are likely more strongly related to leaf shedding within tree canopies than decreases in Chl. Tree stands with a high abundance of deciduous trees may therefore be especially sensitive in triggering NDVI changes in response to drought during the stages leading up to tree mortality. Future studies of drought-related canopy responses should include monitoring of leaf shedding as well as the Chl of shed leaves.


Effects of understory characteristics on browsing patterns of roe deer in central European mountain forests

August 2023

·

115 Reads

·

2 Citations

Selective browsing by deer on young trees may impede the management goal of increasing forest resilience against climate change and other disturbances. Deer population density is often considered the main driver of browsing impacts on young trees, however, a range of other variables such as food availability also affect this relationship. In this study, we use browsing survey data from 135 research plots to explore patterns of roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ) browsing pressure on woody plants in mountainous forests in central Europe. We fitted species‐specific generalised linear mixed models for eight woody taxa, assessing the potential effects of understory characteristics, roe deer abundance and lying deadwood on browsing intensity. Our study reveals conspecific and associational effects for woody taxa that are intermediately browsed by roe deer. Selective browsing pressure was mediated by preferences of plants, in that, browsing of strongly preferred woody taxa as for example mountain ash ( Sorbus aucuparia ) and of least preferred woody taxa, for example Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) was not affected by the surrounding understory vegetation, while browsing pressure on intermediately browsed species like for example silver fir ( Abies alba ) was affected by understory characteristics. Contrary to our expectations, roe deer abundance was only positively associated with browsing pressure on silver fir and bilberry ( Vaccinium myrtillus ), while all other plants were unaffected by deer abundance. Finally, we did not find an influence of lying deadwood volume on the browsing pressure on any woody‐plant species. Overall, our results indicate that patterns in browsing preference and intensity are species‐specific processes and are partly affected by the surrounding understory vegetation. Current management strategies that aim to reduce browsing pressure through culling may be inefficient as they do not address other drivers of browsing pressure. However, managers also need to consider the characteristics of the local understory vegetation in addition to deer abundance and design species‐specific plans to reduce browsing on woody plant taxa.



FIGURE 4 Mean annual soil temperature shows significantly lower spatial variability than air temperature. (a) Global map of mean annual topsoil temperature (SBIO1, 0-5 cm depth, in °C), created by adding the monthly offset between soil and air temperature for the period 2000-2020 (Figure 2) to the monthly air temperature from CHELSA. A black mask is used to exclude regions where our models are extrapolating (i.e. interpolation values in Figure 5 are <0.9, 18% of pixels). Dark grey represents regions outside the modelling area. (b-c) Density plots of mean annual soil temperature across the globe (b) and for each Whittaker biome separately (c) for SBIO1 (dark grey, soil temperature), compared with BIO1 from CHELSA (light grey, air temperature), created by extracting 1,000,000 random points from the 1-km² gridded bioclimatic products. The numbers in (c) represent the standard deviations of air temperature (light grey) and soil temperature (dark grey). Biomes are ordered according to the median annual soil temperature values (vertical black line) from the highest temperature (subtropical desert) to the lowest (tundra)
FIGURE 5 Models of the temperature offset between soil and air temperature have low standard deviations and good global coverage. Analyses for the temperature offset between in situ measured topsoil (0-5 cm depth) temperature and gridded air temperature. (a) Standard deviation (in °C) over the predictions from a cross-validation analysis that iteratively varied the set of covariates (explanatory data layers) and model hyperparameters across 100 models and evaluated model strength using 10-fold cross-validation, for January (left) and July (right), as examples of the two most contrasting months. (b) The fraction of axes in the multidimensional environmental space for which the pixel lies inside the range of data covered by the sensors in the database. Low values indicate increased extrapolation
FIGURE 6 The mean annual soil temperature (SBIO1, 1 x 1 km resolution) modelled here is consistently cooler than ERA5L (9 x 9 km) soil temperature in forested areas. (a) Spatial representation of the difference between SBIO1 based on our model and based on ERA5L soil temperature data. Negative values (blue colours) indicate areas where our model predicts cooler soil temperature. Dark grey areas (Greenland and Antarctica) are excluded from our models. Asterisk in Scandinavia indicates the highlighted area in panels d to f (see below). (b) Distribution of the difference between SBIO1 and ERA5L along the macroclimatic gradient (represented by SBIO1 itself) based on a random subsample of 50,000 points from the map in a). Red line from a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) with k = 4. (c-e) High-resolution zoomed panels of an area of high elevational contrast in Norway (from 66.0-66.4°N, 15.0-16.0°E) visualizing SBIO1 (c), ERA5L (d) and their difference (e), to highlight the higher spatial resolution as obtained with SBIO1
Global maps of soil temperature

April 2022

·

6,216 Reads

·

184 Citations

Global Change Biology

Research in global change ecology relies heavily on global climatic grids derived from estimates of air temperature in open areas at around 2 m above the ground. These climatic grids do not reflect conditions below vegetation canopies and near the ground surface, where critical ecosystem functions occur and most terrestrial species reside. Here, we provide global maps of soil temperature and bioclimatic variables at a 1-km² resolution for 0–5 and 5–15 cm soil depth. These maps were created by calculating the difference (i.e., offset) between in-situ soil temperature measurements, based on time series from over 1200 1-km² pixels (summarized from 8500 unique temperature sensors) across all the world’s major terrestrial biomes, and coarse-grained air temperature estimates from ERA5-Land (an atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts). We show that mean annual soil temperature differs markedly from the corresponding gridded air temperature, by up to 10°C (mean = 3.0 ± 2.1°C), with substantial variation across biomes and seasons. Over the year, soils in cold and/or dry biomes are substantially warmer (+3.6 ± 2.3°C) than gridded air temperature, whereas soils in warm and humid environments are on average slightly cooler (-0.7 ± 2.3°C). The observed substantial and biome-specific offsets emphasize that the projected impacts of climate and climate change on near-surface biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are inaccurately assessed when air rather than soil temperature is used, especially in cold environments. The global soil-related bioclimatic variables provided here are an important step forward for any application in ecology and related disciplines. Nevertheless, we highlight the need to fill remaining geographic gaps by collecting more in-situ measurements of microclimate conditions to further enhance the spatiotemporal resolution of global soil temperature products for ecological applications.


Underlying hypotheses of the study design. See text for the specific hypotheses (H)
Study sites of our field survey. Figure adapted from Frey et al. (2018). Inset figure on right corner shows the design of the survey
Hypothesis 1. Significant linear models (p < .05) between the forest structural complexity variables and the heterogeneity of light. The points show the predicted response values by the model of best fit. The regression line shows the prediction of the respective response where covariates are held constant at their respective means. The light green ribbons show the 95% confidence intervals
Hypothesis 1. Significant generalized linear mixed effects models (p < .05) between the forest structural complexity variables and the heterogeneity resources of soil pH and C:N ratio. The points show the predicted response values by the model of best fit. The regression lines show the marginal means of (a, b) pH–heterogeneity at different diffuse light indices levels (%), and (c, d) C:N ratio heterogeneity at different light heterogeneity levels, considering the significant interactions. The other covariates are held constant at their respective means. The transparent ribbons show the 95% confidence intervals
Hypothesis 2. The influence of light heterogeneity (a) and light intensity (b) on understory species richness. The points show the predicted response values by the model of best fit. The regression lines in (a) show marginal means of light heterogeneity at different C:N ratio levels, considering the significant interaction of these both variables (p = .02). Covariates are held constant at their mean. In (b) the regression shows the relation of species richness to light intensity in the same model (p = .03). The transparent ribbons show the respective 95% confidence intervals
Light heterogeneity affects understory plant species richness in temperate forests supporting the heterogeneity–diversity hypothesis

February 2022

·

327 Reads

·

43 Citations

Abstract One of the most important drivers for the coexistence of plant species is the resource heterogeneity of a certain environment, and several studies in different ecosystems have supported this resource heterogeneity–diversity hypothesis. However, to date, only a few studies have measured heterogeneity of light and soil resources below forest canopies to investigate their influence on understory plant species richness. Here, we aim to determine (1) the influence of forest stand structural complexity on the heterogeneity of light and soil resources below the forest canopy and (2) whether heterogeneity of resources increases understory plant species richness. Measures of stand structural complexity were obtained through inventories and remote sensing techniques in 135 1‐ha study plots of temperate forests, established along a gradient of forest structural complexity. We measured light intensity and soil chemical properties on six 25 m² subplots on each of these 135 plots and surveyed understory vegetation. We calculated the coefficient of variation of light and soil parameters to obtain measures of resource heterogeneity and determined understory plant species richness at plot level. Spatial heterogeneity of light and of soil pH increased with higher stand structural complexity, although heterogeneity of soil pH did not increase in conditions of generally high levels of light availability. Increasing light heterogeneity was also associated with increasing understory plant species richness. However, light heterogeneity had no such effects in conditions where soil resource heterogeneity (variation in soil C:N ratios) was low. Our results support the resource heterogeneity–diversity hypothesis for temperate forest understory at the stand scale. Our results also highlight the importance of interaction effects between the heterogeneity of both light and soil resources in determining plant species richness.



Fig. 5 Studies across ecological context variables. The brown points (and histograms) show data for studies, while blue points (and histograms) describe the range of all ecological contexts across the Arctic study region at 100 × 100 km resolution. Sample size refers to the number of studies with data (i.e., non NA-values). When sample size is given next to the figure subtitle it refers to both variables. When it is given along x and y axis titles, it refers to the specific variable. Note that in these cases the histograms are showing all available data for each of the variables, even though the points are not. For example, histogram for "change in temperature" includes all 662 data points even though only 455 can be plotted against change in NDVI, due to missing data for NDVI
Location of studies and evidence of effects of herbivory on Arctic vegetation: a systematic map Environmental Evidence

October 2021

·

430 Reads

·

14 Citations

Environmental Evidence

Background Herbivores modify the structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Understanding their impacts is necessary to assess the responses of these ecosystems to ongoing environmental changes. However, the effects of herbivores on plants and ecosystem structure and function vary across the Arctic. Strong spatial variation in herbivore effects implies that the results of individual studies on herbivory depend on local conditions, i.e., their ecological context. An important first step in assessing whether generalizable conclusions can be produced is to identify the existing studies and assess how well they cover the underlying environmental conditions across the Arctic. This systematic map aims to identify the ecological contexts in which herbivore impacts on vegetation have been studied in the Arctic. Specifically, the primary question of the systematic map was: “What evidence exists on the effects of herbivores on Arctic vegetation?”. Methods We used a published systematic map protocol to identify studies addressing the effects of herbivores on Arctic vegetation. We conducted searches for relevant literature in online databases, search engines and specialist websites. Literature was screened to identify eligible studies, defined as reporting primary data on herbivore impacts on Arctic plants and plant communities. We extracted information on variables that describe the ecological context of the studies, from the studies themselves and from geospatial data. We synthesized the findings narratively and created a Shiny App where the coded data are searchable and variables can be visually explored. Review findings We identified 309 relevant articles with 662 studies (representing different ecological contexts or datasets within the same article). These studies addressed vertebrate herbivory seven times more often than invertebrate herbivory. Geographically, the largest cluster of studies was in Northern Fennoscandia. Warmer and wetter parts of the Arctic had the largest representation, as did coastal areas and areas where the increase in temperature has been moderate. In contrast, studies spanned the full range of ecological context variables describing Arctic vertebrate herbivore diversity and human population density and impact. Conclusions The current evidence base might not be sufficient to understand the effects of herbivores on Arctic vegetation throughout the region, as we identified clear biases in the distribution of herbivore studies in the Arctic and a limited evidence base on invertebrate herbivory. In particular, the overrepresentation of studies in areas with moderate increases in temperature prevents robust generalizations about the effects of herbivores under different climatic scenarios.


Can bryophyte groups increase functional resolution in tundra ecosystems?

August 2021

·

1,069 Reads

·

20 Citations

The relative contribution of bryophytes to plant diversity, primary productivity, and ecosystem functioning increases towards colder climates. Bryophytes respond to environmental changes at the species level, but because bryophyte species are relatively difficult to identify, they are often lumped into one functional group. Consequently, bryophyte function remains poorly resolved. Here, we explore how higher resolution of bryophyte functional diversity can be encouraged and implemented in tundra ecological studies. We briefly review previous bryophyte functional classifications and the roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems and their susceptibility to environmental change. Based on shoot morphology and colony organization, we then propose twelve easily distinguishable bryophyte functional groups. To illustrate how bryophyte functional groups can help elucidate variation in bryophyte effects and responses, we compiled existing data on water holding capacity, a key bryophyte trait. Although plant functional groups can mask potentially high interspecific and intraspecific variability, we found better separation of bryophyte functional group means compared with previous grouping systems regarding water holding capacity. This suggests that our bryophyte functional groups truly represent variation in the functional roles of bryophytes in tundra ecosystems. Lastly, we provide recommendations to improve the monitoring of bryophyte community changes in tundra study sites.


Deepened snow enhances gross nitrogen cycling among Pan-Arctic tundra soils during both winter and summer

July 2021

·

50 Reads

·

26 Citations

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Many Arctic regions currently experience an increase in winter snowfall as a result of climate change. Deepened snow can enhance thermal insulation of the underlying soil during winter, resulting in warmer soil temperatures that promote soil microbial nitrogen (N)-cycle processes and the availability of N and other nutrients. We conducted an ex situ study comparing the effects of deepened snow (using snow fences that have been installed for 3-13 years) on microbial N-cycle processes in late summer (late growing season) and winter (late snow-covered season) among five tundra sites in three different geographic locations across the Arctic (Greenland (dry and wet tundra), Canada (mesic tundra), and Svalbard, Norway (heath and meadow tundra)). Soil gross N cycling rates (mineralization, nitrification, immobilization of ammonium (NH4⁺) and nitrate (NO3⁻), and denitrification) were determined using a ¹⁵N pool dilution. Potential denitrification activity (PDA) and nitrous oxide reductase activity (N2OR) were measured to assess denitrifying enzyme activities. The deepened snow treatment across all sites had a significant effect of the potential soil capacity of accelerating N cycling rates in late winter, including quadrupled gross nitrification, tripled NO3⁻-N immobilization, and doubled denitrification as well as significantly enhanced late summer gross N mineralization, denitrification (two-fold) and NH4⁺-N availability. The increase in gross N mineralization and nitrification rates were primarily driven by the availability of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON) across sites. The largest increases in winter DOC and DON concentrations due to deepened snow were observed at the two wetter sites (wet and mesic tundra), and N cycling rates were also more strongly affected by deepened snow at these two sites than at the three other drier sites. Together, these results suggest that the potential effects of deepened winter snow in stimulating microbial N-cycling activities will be most pronounced in relatively moist tundra ecosystems. Hence, this study provides support to prior observations that growing season biogeochemical cycles in the Arctic are sensitive to snow depth with altered nutrient availability for microorganisms and vegetation. It can be speculated that on the one hand growing season N availability will increase and promote plant growth, but on the other hand foster increased water- and gaseous (e.g. N2 and N2O) N-losses with implications for overall nutrient status.


Citations (19)


... Numerous studies have found that key leaf traits are regulated by climatic factors. Under suitable temperature and precipitation conditions, trees allocate more resources to compete for light, increasing SLA and decreasing LDMC (Kuppler et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2022a;Zheng et al., 2024). Conversely, cold and arid environments increase survival stress in trees, forcing them to allocate more resources to survival. ...

Reference:

Leaf nutrient traits exhibit greater environmental plasticity compared to resource utilization traits along an elevational gradient
Effects of plant diversity on productivity strengthen over time due to trait-dependent shifts in species overyielding

... However, the largest group (n = 27) of studies with an exclusive focus on droughts refer to the mortality of a tree, stand, or forest. The focus of the studies on Germany [87,105,[127][128][129][130][131] and the USA [132][133][134][135][136][137][138] is noticeable. With seven study areas in each country, this proportion is distinctly higher than the overall distribution. ...

Quantifying the influence of tree species richness on community drought resistance using drone-derived NDVI and ground-based measures of Plant Area Index and leaf chlorophyll in a young tree diversity experiment

European Journal of Forest Research

... This is worthy of further investigation, as beneficial effects of deer to forest ecosystems remain under-researched (Putman and Reimoser, 2011). A possible solution to minimize such trade-off lies in promoting forest structures that change deer browsing behaviour, rather than focusing on reducing deer abundances (Schwegmann et al., 2023b;Smit et al., 2012). ...

Effects of understory characteristics on browsing patterns of roe deer in central European mountain forests

... Here, one might expect a decoupling between abundance and ecosystem effect. Despite the extensive literature on herbivory in the Arctic [12], there has been no comprehensive attempt to synthesize the impacts of herbivore diversity on tundra ecosystems. ...

Correction to: Location of studies and evidence of effects of herbivory on Arctic vegetation: a systematic map

Environmental Evidence

... Similarly, the findings of Liang et al. (2019);Chun et al. (2020); Kothandaraman et al. (2020;Gao et al. (2021;LaRue et al. (2023) also highlighted that vegetation types play a dominant role in ecosystem functioning, which further Table 3 S. Ullah et al. 125 Page 8 of 15 strengthens our outcome. Moreover, previous literature indicates that different forest types lead to variation in the overstory functional characteristics and light availability, which in turn also influences the functional values of understory plants (Liu et al. 2015;Helbach et al. 2022). Studies by (Barbier et al. 2008;Sajedi et al. 2012;Tinya et al. 2021) further emphasize that forest types can influence the dynamics of ecosystem function through abiotic heterogeneity, including resource use strategies, soil resource heterogeneity, and taxa (flora, fauna) abundance/activity. ...

Light heterogeneity affects understory plant species richness in temperate forests supporting the heterogeneity–diversity hypothesis

... This temperature does not account for soil temperature changes. Soil temperature can differ by 10°C, compared to atmospheric temperature, around the world (Lembrechts et al. 2022), with groundcover vegetation type creating microclimates buffering temperature differences (De Frenne et al. 2019;Huang et al. 2024;Xiao, Ma, and Hu 2019). Under extreme dry conditions, such vegetation reduces high air temperatures and soil moisture loss (Lortie et al. 2022), which is linked to evapotranspiration and rainfall in drylands (Zhou et al. 2021). ...

Global maps of soil temperature

Global Change Biology

... Wild ungulates are important drivers of the dynamics of many terrestrial ecosystems and impact biodiversity at different system levels. Studies on ungulate species and their ecological interactions with forestry, agriculture, and other land-use activities in different landscapes may particularly relate to the following topics: ungulates and their habitats-ecological dependencies, interactions in different ecosystems, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6]; effects of ungulates on forest composition and structure in different forest communities, e.g., [1,[7][8][9][10][11]; wildlife ungulates as pests in forestry and agriculture, as well as in disease transmission, e.g., [3,10,12]; methods for studying the ecological effects of ungulates, e.g., [13][14][15]; ungulates and their predators-interactions and predator-ungulate-plant cascades, e.g., [16,17]; management of ungulates-sustainability, biodiversity, and human-wildlife conflict, e.g., [3,4,[18][19][20]; the conservation of ungulates and habitats, and their genetic diversity, e.g., [2,13,18,21]. ...

Location of studies and evidence of effects of herbivory on Arctic vegetation: a systematic map Environmental Evidence

Environmental Evidence

... The exchange of knowledge and collaboration between disciplines, especially between taxonomists and ecologists, bridges knowledge gaps and thus paves the way for excellent bryophyte ecology research. Including bryophytes in vegetation studies as functional groups is another way to incorporate their significant ecological roles at a coarser taxonomic resolution level (Lett et al., 2022). Successful initiatives for data sharing include the recently compiled comprehensive databases on bryophyte functional traits such as Bryophytes of Europe Traits (Van Zuijlen et al., 2023) and BryForTrait (Bernhardt-Römermann, Poschlod, & Hentschel, 2018), and the herbarium database Consortium of Bryophyte Herbaria that makes millions of herbarium specimens available online. ...

Can bryophyte groups increase functional resolution in tundra ecosystems?

... A more thorough analysis of soil N dynamics hence requires measurements of microbial gross N cycling processes, e.g. by the 15 N-pool dilution technique (Davidson et al. 1992;Braun et al. 2018), which is, however, relatively seldom applied, likely because of the time effort of the method. Only very few studies have analysed gross N cycling processes in arctic or alpine tundra ecosystems at more than one time point (e.g., Fisk et al. 1998;Weintraub and Schimel 2005b;Xu et al. 2021), which allows the analysis of seasonal patterns in N dynamics. ...

Deepened snow enhances gross nitrogen cycling among Pan-Arctic tundra soils during both winter and summer
  • Citing Article
  • July 2021

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

... Such experiments provide valuable insights into shrub responses to changes in local growing conditions , despite uncertainties related to predicting Arctic precipitation patterns and landscape-scale snow cover (Bintanja et al., 2020;McCrystall et al., 2021;Rixen et al., 2022). However, shrub responses to snow vary, with both negative (e.g., lower live cover (Cooper et al., 2019)) and positive (e.g., increased stem length ) influences observed on Arctic shrubs across different species, studies, and habitat types (Mörsdorf and Cooper, 2021). Our understanding of the overall effect of changing snow-cover on Arctic shrub dynamics remains limited due to these varying responses, exacerbated by a lack of studies focused on the influence of snow cover on radial growth and the underlying cellular mechanisms (Power et al., 2022). ...

Habitat determines plant community responses to climate change in the High Arctic