Martin J. Head’s research while affiliated with Brock University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (103)


The sharp change across the base of the proposed Anthropocene series (1952 CE) in varved sediments from Crawford Lake is recorded by numerous proxies of the Great Acceleration reflecting nuclear weapons testing (²³⁹⁺²⁴⁰Pu, ¹³⁷Cs and F¹⁴C), the consequence of burning fossil fuels (spheroidal carbonaceous particles or SCPs/fly ash, δ¹⁵N), and consequent changes to lake ecology (relative increase in the deep‐dwelling chrysophyte Synura; decline in the diatom Lindavia michiganiana). The onset of rapid increase in plutonium fallout from thermonuclear weapons testing at 17.5 cm in core CRA23‐BC‐1F‐B led to the proposed beginning of the Anthropocene epoch, nominally coinciding with the detonation of the first H‐bomb, Ivy Mike, in the Pacific Proving Grounds (Waters et al., 2024). Data from 2019 to 2022 cores from McCarthy et al. (2023) and 2023 core from Waters et al. (2024).
An unprecedented increase in the rate and magnitude of greenhouse gas concentrations during the past 72 years compared with the previous 30,000 years or more has already produced mean global surface temperature almost as warm as the Last Interglacial. This increase is part of the Great Acceleration, and most climate models predict temperatures warmer than at any time since the Neogene by the end of this century. The important but far more modest earlier human impacts on our planet, extending back perhaps 50,000 years, belong to the Anthropogenic Modification Episode of Waters et al. (2022), and conflating these with the Anthropocene minimizes the importance of Paul Crutzen's insight. Modified from Turner et al. (2024).
Would Adding the Anthropocene to the Geologic Time Scale Matter?
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2025

·

29 Reads

·

Martin J. Head

·

Colin N. Waters

·

Jan Zalasiewicz

Plain Language Summary The extraordinary fossil fuel‐driven outburst of consumption and production since the mid‐twentieth century has fundamentally altered the way the Earth System works. Although humans have impacted their environment for millennia, justification for a new interval of geologic time lies in the radical shift in the geologic record that marks this “Great Acceleration” of the human enterprise. The rejection of a proposal to define the beginning of the Anthropocene epoch with a “golden spike” in varved sediments from Crawford Lake, Canada, means that we officially we still live in the Holocene, when in practical terms we do not. Formal recognition of the Anthropocene will acknowledge the facts supporting global warming and many other planetary changes that are irreversible on geologic time scales, aligning the Earth Sciences with geologic, planetary and societal reality.

Download



The Anthropocene, a Conceptual Tool for Education.

October 2024

·

195 Reads

From the Abstract: The biogeophysical and socio-political knowledge of the Anthropocene, while transforming our understanding of the Earth System, is also renewing our understanding of human existence and raising questions about education at a time when profound existential challenges are looming. These issues are now inextricably linked. Human existence, and the Earth System, are caught up within three fundamental trajectories. In the planetary dimension, this is leading towards a rapid shift in climate, already outside of conditions previously experienced by organized human societies. In the terrestrial dimension, many ecosystems have become highly degraded [18, 19], as is also the case in the seas, as with, for example, coral-based reefs [20]. And, in the global dimension of our societies, the dominant process is an acceleration of technological, social, and political change. Processes of shift, collapse, acceleration reinforce each other, impacting (unequally) on human communities. (for full poster abstract see full text)


Is the Technosphere causing a State Shift to the Earth System in the Anthropocene?

From the Abstract: The technosphere sensu Peter Haff [12] has auton- omous qualities, being not so much human-directed as incorporating dependent, strongly divided human soci- eties, while parasitizing its parent biosphere for energy and materials. By far the most recent and rapidly evolving of Earth’s ‘spheres’, it is also the most unsta- ble, recycling far fewer of its resources than the bio- sphere, its accumulating waste products in all other “spheres” simultaneously threatening biosphere integ- rity and its own continued existence. The techno- sphere’s potential future pathways are highly disparate: a) will it continue to rapidly degrade the biosphere as a parasite, likely causing a mass extinction and thus a reset in the trajectory of biological evolution?; or b) can it evolve (or be steered) rapidly into mutualistic relations, in which case its functional interaction with the biosphere may well represent a new Earth state? More immediate issues include managing its potential for environmental management, e.g. via satellite ob- servations – while simultaneously avoiding making near-space unusable by accumulation of orbiting tech- no debris. For the time being it is a key analogue, the only one known, in considering the possibilities and fates of intelligent, manipulative life elsewhere in the cosmos. (see full text for entire conference abstract)


The New Geology of the Anthropocene

From the Abstract: The Anthropocene is a particularly powerful con- ceptual tool, and encapsulates the complex intercon- nectivity of all the ‘-spheres’ on this planet. It quickly became a key framing concept for Earth System re- searchers. From this, and from its subsequent geologi- cal analysis, it grew to spark off considerable cross- disciplinary dialogue among the social as well as phys- ical sciences, and the humanities and arts, involving fundamental humanistic questions such as the relations between nature and culture [23, 24]. More widely, it enables a vision of the world (scientific, political, eco- nomic, cultural, etc.) that is grounded in reality, and that helps frame societal questions of sustainability. An Anthropocene literacy may help sketch out different, evidence-based, pathways into the future of this planet [25], even as the effects of this new epoch extend out to other planetary bodies [26, 27]. (for the entire conference abstract see full text)



The future extent of the Anthropocene epoch: A synthesis

September 2024

·

361 Reads

·

4 Citations

Global and Planetary Change

We synthesize research from complementary scientific fields to address the likely future extent and duration of the proposed Anthropocene epoch. Intensification of human-forced climate change began from about 1970 onwards with steepening increases in greenhouse gases, ocean acidification, global temperature and sea level, along with ice loss. The resulting distinction between relatively stable Holocene climatic conditions and those of the proposed Anthropocene epoch is substantial, with many aspects irreversible. The still-rising trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions is leading to yet greater and more permanent divergence of the Anthropocene from the Holocene Earth System. We focus here on the effects of the ensuing climate transformation and its impact on the likely duration of this novel state of the Earth System. Given the magnitude and rapid rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), its long lifetime in the atmosphere, and the present disequilibrium in Earth’s energy budget (expressed as the Earth’s Energy Imbalance, or EEI), both temperatures and sea level must continue to rise – even with carbon emissions lowered to net zero (where anthropogenic CO2 emissions = anthropogenic CO2 removals) – until the energy budget balance is eventually restored. Even if net zero were achieved immediately, elevated global temperatures would persist for at least several tens of millennia, with expected levels of warmth by the end of this century not seen since the early Late Pliocene. Interglacial conditions are likely to persist for at least 50,000 years under already-accumulated CO2 emissions and Earth’s low eccentricity orbit. Continued increases in greenhouse gas emissions are likely to extend that persistence to around 500,000 years, suppressing the pronounced expression of Milankovitch cyclicity typical of the later Pleistocene Epoch. This major perturbation alone is sufficient to justify the Anthropocene as terminating the Holocene Epoch. The wider and mostly irreversible effects of climate change, not least in amplifying reconfiguration of the biosphere, emphasize the scale of this departure from Holocene conditions, justifying the establishment of a new epoch. Given such perspectives, the Anthropocene epoch represents what will become a lasting and substantial change in the Earth System. It is the Holocene Epoch at only 11,700 years duration that will appear as the ‘blip’ in the Geological Time Scale, a brief interval when complex, settled human societies co-existed with, but did not overwhelm, a stable Earth System.


How palaeontological signatures of the Anthropocene are stratigraphically unique

Increasing human interactions with the biosphere over tens of millennia have left a fossil record that shows the growing geographical spread and technological sophistication of humans evident in patterns of extinction and domestication of the landscape and its plants and animals. Here, we focus on the "Great Acceleration" of the mid-20th century (e.g. Steffen et al. 2015) which provides the causal mechanism of the proposed Anthropocene epoch (Waters et al., 2023) in which rapid increases in human and domesticated animal populations, energy consumption and technological innovation coincide with globalization of industry and commerce. Key parameters and their diagnostic palaeontological signals of the Anthropocene include: 1) the rapid breakdown of discrete biogeographical ranges for marine and terrestrial species with successions in North America, South America, Africa, Oceania, Europe and Asia correlatable using palaeontological signatures of highly invasive species and changes to ecologies that demonstrate the growing interconnectivity of human systems through expansion of global shipping, road networks, physical connection of water masses and recent development of aquaculture; 2) rapid changes to ecologies resulting from climate change, e.g. loss of coral reefs and poleward shifts of species through thermal stress, and ecological degradation, e.g. nutrient enrichment in lakes and coastal zones causing eutrophication and hypoxia, and extensive damming of rivers inhibiting movement of species and causing local extirpation; 3) an 'acme biozone' of human and domesticated animal skeletons co-occurring with a domesticated plant pollen record and coincident with greatly reduced populations, ecological ranges and extinctions of ‘wild’ species; 4) the rising volume and unique depositional settings of landfills containing large quantities of organic wastes recording the spread of exotic foodstuffs far beyond their geographical range of environmental tolerance, notably of seeds of internationally traded fruits, e.g. avocados, coconuts, mangos and peaches; and 5) the accumulation of reconfigured forest materials including paper, paperboard and engineered wood products such as medium density fibreboard (MDF). The presentation addresses how a range of depositional settings may preserve a long-lived, unique palaeontological record for post- mid-20th century deposits that is distinct from all past records of deep-time biotic change, including those of the Holocene, and is consistent with the proposal of the Anthropocene as an epoch of geological time.


The Duration of the Anthropocene Epoch

Applying the basic principles of carbon chemistry and physics, along with a comprehensive understanding of past climate change, Steffen and colleagues confirmed in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, in 2018, that fossil fuel usage and resulting carbon emissions will cause substantial global warming into future millennia. The climate shift caused by increasing greenhouse gases is provoking a major perturbation to the Earth System likely to last for hundreds of thousands of years according to Talento & Ganopolski in Earth System Dynamics 12, in 2021, because of (i) the long residence time of CO2 in the atmosphere; (ii) the reduced ability of the global ocean to serve as a carbon sink as warming continues; (iii) the release to the atmosphere of CO2 currently stored in the ocean to maintain chemical equilibrium between the ocean and atmosphere as emissions of CO2 begin to decline; (iv) the decrease in albedo through continuing ice melt; and (v) a transgression forced by sea level rises of 10-15m or more supplying organic rich sediments to coastal seas and thus increasing the ocean’s carbon content. These drastic changes and associated largely irreversible changes to the biosphere justify the creation of a new epoch – the Anthropocene. Intensification of the greenhouse effect results from the growth in emissions of the CO2 equivalent (CO2-eq), calculated as the sum of the effects of CO2+CH4+N2O+CFCs and other trace gases. According to NOAA’s Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, in spring 2022 the CO2-eq had reached 523 ppm. Such high concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are above those identified in the early Late Pliocene, around 3.5 Ma ago, and are close to those identified for the mid-Miocene (16.9–14.7 Ma ago), which were known intervals of uncommon warmth during Neogene times. According to the IPCC’s 6th assessment report (of 2023) projections based on intermediate emissions scenarios place us on track by 2100 to experience CO2 concentrations of 600 ppm that would raise mean global temperature by 2.7°C, a level higher than experienced during Quaternary time. That same report considered that global mean sea-level rise approaching 2m by 2100 and over 15 m by 2300 cannot be ruled out due to deep uncertainty in ice sheet processes, with severe impacts on coastal populations. The ensuing prevention of the glacial maxima typical of the past 1 Ma is expected to last at least 500,000 years, assuaging concerns that the Anthropocene it too short in duration to qualify as a new epoch.


Citations (66)


... The current duration of the Anthropocene is brief, but its distinctive characteristics are documented, geologically, historically and instrumentally, with unparalleled precision and temporal resolution. The rapid rate of change at onset, at enormous and often sustained magnitudes, the irreversibility of many transformations, and the extent and permanence of its geologic signature, give the Anthropocene legitimacy as a new epoch (Summerhayes et al., 2024;Williams et al., 2024). ...

Reference:

Would Adding the Anthropocene to the Geologic Time Scale Matter?
The future extent of the Anthropocene epoch: A synthesis

Global and Planetary Change

... Im Anthropozän, dem ‚Erdzeitalter des Menschen', hat menschliches Einwirken zu tiefgreifenden Veränderungen im Erdsystem geführt (vgl. Zalasiewicz et al., 2024), und der Begriff Anthropozän wurde zu einem transdisziplinären Brückenkonzept, um das Verständnis für "die Natur als ein komplexes System" zu vertiefen, "dem der Mensch als integraler Bestandteil zugehört" (Horn & Bergthaller, 2019, 6). Das Anthropozän bietet daher auch einen bedeutsamen Denkrahmen für transformative Bildungsprozesse auf dem Weg zu kultureller Nachhaltigkeit (vgl. ...

What should the Anthropocene mean? (Comment)

Nature

... So far, the considerable biosphere changes already apparent (e.g. Williams et al. 2022Williams et al. , 2024, some without precedent in Earth history, have been driven largely by human predation, human-driven habitat loss, and species translocations. As climate warms, a wide range of other biosphere effects will be initiated or exacerbated. ...

Palaeontological signatures of the Anthropocene are distinct from those of previous epochs

Earth-Science Reviews

... The current duration of the Anthropocene is brief, but its distinctive characteristics are documented, geologically, historically and instrumentally, with unparalleled precision and temporal resolution. The rapid rate of change at onset, at enormous and often sustained magnitudes, the irreversibility of many transformations, and the extent and permanence of its geologic signature, give the Anthropocene legitimacy as a new epoch (Summerhayes et al., 2024;Williams et al., 2024). ...

Palaeontological signatures of the Anthropocene are distinct from those of previous epochs
  • Citing Preprint
  • June 2024

Earth-Science Reviews

... In the varved marine sediments of Beppu Bay, Japan, designated by the AWG as the standard auxiliary boundary stratotype section for the Anthropocene ( 19 ), a hockey stick-like surge in cumulative anthropogenic fingerprint counts is recognized in 1953 CE, capturing clear stratigraphic evidence for the potential onset of the Anthropocene ( 20 ). Although this merely indicates a local chronostratigraphic boundary, it reflects the moment when human activities became so significant that cumulative pressures began to rapidly and fundamentally transform various physical, chemical, and biological processes and cycles. ...

Part 2: Descriptions of the proposed Crawford Lake GSSP and supporting SABSs. The Anthropocene Epoch and Crawfordian Age: proposals by the Anthropocene Working Group

... For boundaries lacking formal definition status or constraining numerical ages, still an approximate numerical age is provided (indicated with ~ symbol). This online index table also lists ICS-ratified SABSs: Standard Auxiliary Boundary Stratotypes (Head et al., 2023) that were formalised in the ICS stratigraphical framework in the last years. These reference sites support GSSPs, and are defined using similar proposal formulation, discussion and voting procedures as the GSSPs. ...

Part 1: Anthropocene Series/Epoch: stratigraphic context and justification of rank The Anthropocene Epoch and Crawfordian Age: proposals by the Anthropocene Working Group

... Since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, the unprecedented increase in carbon emissions (often termed as "great acceleration") coupled with radioactive elements (product of nuclear proliferation) have changed the planet Earth's mantle, crust, and atmosphere in a way that would be witnessed by generations to come, even after millions of years [2]. Some environmental economists have even declared this era the "Anthropocene Epoch", where human activities have had an irreversible impact on climate, ecosystems, soil, water, atmosphere, biodiversity, acidification of oceans, and natural habitats [2,3]. Scientists have pronounced anthropogenic activities as the primary underlying reason for this environmental fiasco [4]. ...

The Duration of the Anthropocene Epoch: A Synthesis
  • Citing Preprint
  • January 2024

... Head et al. (2024) emphasize the importance of the Volyn biota for evolution, especially in the so-called "boring billion", in a detailed outline about the biological and geological context. However, they question the idea that the Volyn biota represent Precambrian fossils and instead argue that they contain young contaminants of "museum dust". ...

Comment on “The Volyn biota (Ukraine) – indications of 1.5 Gyr old eukaryotes in 3D preservation, a spotlight on the `boring billion' ” by Franz et al. (2023)

... Elbr€ achter et al. (2023) observed that Articles 11.7 and 11.8 of the Shenzhen Code, which show through examples how dual nomenclature works, are in some ways contradictory. This prompted Head et al. (2024a) to review the Code's treatment of dual nomenclature, leading to the proposal of new Articles 11.7 and 11.8. These proposals were drafted to clarify the Code's treatment of priority between fossil-and non-fossil names (new Article 11.7) and introduce explicit provisions for dual nomenclature. ...

Critique of Proposals 258–260 to eliminate contradiction between Articles 11.7 and 11.8 and to equate non‐fossil with fossil names of dinophytes for purposes of priority, by Elbrächter & al. (2023), and ensuing recommendations
  • Citing Article
  • February 2024

Taxon

... Spiniferites membranaceus was originally described from Pleistocene or Holocene deposits of the Ashkelon borehole on the coastal plain of Israel (Rossignol, 1964). The cysttheca relationship was established by incubating cysts collected near England and Ireland, and the equivalent motile cells were described as Gonyaulax membranacea (Ellegaard et al., 2003;Lewis et al., 1999) but later renamed as G. lewisiae (Head et al., 2024). Spiniferites mirabilis is similar to S. membranaceus in terms of an antapical flange but differs in having consistent intergonal processes (Rossignol, 1964). ...

Dual nomenclature in organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts II: Spiniferites elongatus and S. membranaceus, and their equivalent non-fossil species Gonyaulax ovum comb. nov. and G. lewisiae sp. nov.
  • Citing Article
  • January 2024

Palynology