... Twenty-nine unique data sources were identified in these studies; five studies were conducted with data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) [19][20][21][22][23] and two obtained data from the same two private family medicine clinics 24,25 EMR data for supporting AMS Six categories of EMR data used for supporting AMS were identified from the studies included in the review. These were, (i) assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality, 23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] (ii) measuring the effectiveness of an intervention, 25,28,29,34,37,38,[40][41][42][43][44] (iii) analyzing antimicrobial prescribing trends, [22][23][24]26,27,31,36,37,39,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] , (iv) assessing patient and provider characteristics in prescribing [21][22][23][24]26,27,31,32,36,38,39,47,49,51,52 (v) evaluating novel tools or measures 33,53 , and (vi) measuring specific conditions and outcomes. 19,23,35,48,50,52 The specific conditions and outcomes measured were: serious infection rates due to lower antibiotic prescribing, impetigo incidence, treatment and recurrence, prevalence and documentation quality of beta-lactam allergies, changes in antibiotic prescribing for different patient demographics and indications over time, male urinary tract infection prevalence, and pre-and post-pandemic respiratory tract infection (RTI) presentations. ...