Mark Mckinnon’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Fig. 6. EDX (a) spectrum and (b) mapping of the copper pillar bump.
Fig. 7. C-SAM anomaly was detected at the die edge.
Fig. 8. 3D X-ray image at the C-SAM anomaly location.
Fig. 10. Active damage was observed on the die.
Fig. 12. Optical image of the unit at the AOI after MIP etching with slight discoloration of the die metal observed at the C-SAM anomaly location.

+3

Oxygen-Based Microwave Induced Plasma Etching for Epoxy Molding Compound Removal in Advanced Semiconductor Devices
  • Conference Paper
  • Full-text available

July 2023

·

301 Reads

·

1 Citation

Hong Siang Tan

·

Bernice Zee

·

·

[...]

·

Mark McKinnon

Heterogenous integration has led to the development of advanced semiconductor packages with better performance and smaller form factor. Such packages usually comprise of multiple dies and embedded components which are encapsulated with epoxy molding compounds (EMCs) to improve the reliability performance and to protect the die from external impact. However, this increases the difficulty of failure analysis (FA) as the defects may manifest in the embedded components that are covered by EMCs. Suitable sample preparation techniques and workflows are required to remove EMCs to reveal the defects to determine the root cause of failure. This paper explores the use of microwave induced plasma (MIP) etcher to remove EMCs. Tool parameters are varied to understand their effects on the removal rate of EMCs such as underfill.

Download

Figure 7: Tilted environmental SEM images of µbumps after MIP processing. Most of the UF has been removed around non-defective µbumps. (a) A single row of exposed µbumps. (b) Two staggered rows of µbumps exposed enabling analysis of defects further into the cross-section.
Figure 8: SEM images of the two subsequently processed samples with the entire row including the defective µpillars exposed through MIP processing. (a)  This sample was polished to just before the first µpillar row. The MIP process exposed the first row sufficiently but did not uncover the second. (b) A sample where the first µpillar row was mechanically polished into. The MIP process was able to expose the second row into the sample.
Figure 11: Optical images of pre and post MIP processing focusing on removing the overmold around the HBM top chip stack and the UF over the interposer and between the top chips. (a) Top down optical image of the HBM overmold and surrounding UF. (b) Top down optical image of the HBM after MIP processing has removed the overmold and UF. (c) An angled optical image of the HBM before MIP processing. (d) An angled optical after MIP processing.
Benefits of using a CF4-Free Microwave Induced Plasma (MIP) Spot Etch Process to Remove Underfill and Analyze 2.5D Modules

December 2020

·

868 Reads

Advanced packages such as 2.5D will continue to grow in demand as performance increases are needed in various applications. Failure analysis must adapt to the changes in the interfaces, materials and structures being developed and now utilized. Traditional techniques and tools used for selectively removing materials to isolate and analyze defects need to evolve alongside these packages. A CF4-free Microwave Induced Plasma (MIP) process is used to remove underfill (UF) with minimal alteration of other materials on the samples, a process which has become more difficult on 2.5D modules. UF is removed using this MIP process to allow subsequent analysis on interposer interconnects and µbumps in cross-section. SEM inspection, Electron Beam Absorbed Current (EBAC), and FIB are techniques used post cross-sectional UF removal of these 2.5D structures. The benefits of the specific MIP process through case studies are presented. Specifically, the use of an automatic cleaning step and a CF4-free downstream O2 plasma allow easy removal of UF without damaging other structures of interest with little tool recipe development.