June 2019
·
9 Reads
·
1 Citation
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
June 2019
·
9 Reads
·
1 Citation
July 2015
·
402 Reads
·
2 Citations
Parce qu’elles ont vu pour la première fois l’usage de la voiture stagner, les années 2000 marquent un tournant dans l’histoire de la mobilité quotidienne. Cette évolution de nos sociétés est à inscrire dans un contexte marqué par la transition numérique en cours, une transition environnementale que chacun appelle de ses voeux et l’augmentation des contraintes financières pesant sur les ménages et les acteurs publics. Issu d’un partenariat entre l’Ifsttar et le Cerema, cet ouvrage invite à explorer plus en avant les causes et les conséquences de tels changements dans le contexte actuel. Pour cela, les méthodes d’enquêtes demandent à être adaptées, les analyses approfondies et diversifiées et les outils d’aide à la décision repensés. C’est à ce triple exercice que ce travail, qui rassemble une quarantaine de contributions de chercheurs et techniciens des domaines de l’aménagement et des transports, se propose de contribuer. Pour en savoir plus: http://www.territoires-ville.cerema.fr/a-la-une-la-mobilite-en-transition-a1755.html Mobility at a time of transition : knowing, understanding and visualising. Because for the first time they saw the use of the car stagnate, the 2000s marked a turning point in the history of everyday mobility. This change in our societies is part of a context marked by the digital transition Under way, an environmental transition that everyone is calling for and increasing Financial impératives weighing on households and public stakeholders. This publication is the result of a partnership between Ifstar and Cerema. It invites the reader to further explore the causes and conséquences of such changes, in the current context. To do this, the Survey methods have to be adapted, analyses deepened and diversified, and decision-making Tools redesigned. This work attemps to contribute to these three challenges by bringing together some forty contributions from researchers and technicians in the fields of planning and transport.
January 2015
·
29 Reads
TRB 2015 - Session 602: Panel, Continuous, and Cross-Sectional Travel Survey, WASHINGTON D.C., ETATS-UNIS, 13-/01/2015 - 13/01/2015
November 2014
·
20 Reads
14th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, WINDSOR, ROYAUME-UNI, 19-/07/2015 - 23/07/2015
April 2014
·
388 Reads
·
4 Citations
Au cours des quatre dernières années, nous avons coordonné des travaux de recherche sur l’harmonisation des enquêtes de mobilité en Europe pour l’Action COST SHANTI (Survey Harmonization with New Technologies Improvement). 36 laboratoires de 21 pays (d’Europe, mais aussi l’Australie) ont oeuvré ensemble, en 20 réunions et 4 groupes de travail, notamment pour harmoniser les méthodes de production et de traitement de données nationales sur la mobilité, tenant compte des derniers apports des nouvelles technologies (traces gps, gsm, rds, etc.), afin de pouvoir réaliser des comparaisons internationales. Ainsi, des travaux portant sur la correction des biais de méthodes entre enquêtes des différents pays ont permis de produire des estimateurs de mobilité quotidienne robustes et cohérents. Cette Action a été un espace de discussion non seulement pour faire émerger (avec Eurostat et la DG Move) de nouveaux projets autour des données, sur la collecte en continu et la standardisation permise par ces nouvelles technologies, mais aussi pour produire des articles et communications scientifiques.
April 2014
·
270 Reads
The Shanti COST Action has coordinated research efforts on data harmonization for transport surveys across Europe. Guidelines for harmonizing surveys are not only a statistical problem, because each country also needs to analyze survey results throughout time (time series in the perspective of previous surveys on the same thematic issues with normally the same design) and changing the protocol or the definitions may have an impact on indicators in the sense that the changing behavior could be confused with changes in methodology. Therefore a bottom up approach relying on the skills of the researchers involved in the field of national travel surveys and so quite well knowing their particularities sounds more promising and could lead to more acceptable guidelines. To make results of different survey approaches comparable, it is necessary to develop a methodology or heuristic in which way a transition from one design to another can be derived and how the results of either survey approach can be "translated" or transformed into the results of another.
January 2014
·
87 Reads
·
16 Citations
The Shanti COST Action has coordinated research efforts on data harmonization for transport surveys across Europe. Guidelines for harmonizing surveys are not only a statistical problem, because each country also needs to analyze survey results throughout time (time series in the perspective of previous surveys on the same thematic issues with normally the same design) and changing the protocol or the definitions may have an impact on indicators in the sense that the changing behavior could be confused with changes in methodology. Therefore a bottom up approach relying on the skills of the researchers involved in the field of national travel surveys and so quite well knowing their particularities sounds more promising and could lead to more acceptable guidelines. To make results of different survey approaches comparable – it is necessary to develop a methodology or heuristic in which way a transition from one design to another can be derived and how the results of either survey approach can be “tran
... While parking is involved at the beginning and end of car trips, it is considered less significant than the number of trips or the purpose of trips. A survey of 81 experts regarding data needs indicated that characteristics of the dwelling, household vehicles, and parking facilities are seen as less essential [114]. This is also evident from the fact that parking is often only briefly mentioned or not mentioned at all in the final reports of the considered surveys. ...
January 2014
... Pour ces enquêtes, les individus sont interviewés, le plus souvent, à leur domicile et pour leur mobilité quotidienne, ils décrivent les déplacements qu'ils ont réalisés la veille de l'interview (généralement autour de leur domicile). Ce protocole d'observation des déplacements de la veille de l'interview est utilisé dans les enquêtes déplacements en France comme dans de nombreux autres pays et sert de base pour l'analyse des déplacements et la modélisation du trafic, entre-autres [5,6]. En conséquence, les déplacements qui sont réalisés sur les lieux de vacances ou les lieux de résidence inhabituelle sont très mal appréhendés. ...
July 2015
... Considering all points, a compromise is necessary to mix both existing and new indicators. Based on a previous survey and learning from the results of Cost-SHANTI (Armoogum et al. 2014) and EPOMMTEMS (EPOMM Mobility management 2013), the paper accepts a voluntary and accessible system. This system must be patient with cities that at the moment define indicators in a less uniform form or based on a less sophisticated and uniform methodology. ...
April 2014