Margaret E. Radcliffe’s research while affiliated with University of Alabama and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Verification of isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) produced by serum-free MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) Representative top surface scanning electron micrograph (FE-SEM) of a pre-filtration Synder LY membrane used for EV isolation (left; scale bar: 100 nm) and histogram demonstrating size distribution of pore sizes (right). (B) Representative transmission electron micrograph (TEM) image of EVs derived using ultracentrifugation (UC; left) and of EVs derived using direct flow filtration (DFF; right). (C) Exosome Antibody Array of MDA-MB-231 whole cell lysate, UC-derived EV proteins, and DFF-derived EV proteins (50 µg each). Numbers represent relative intensity of the bands compared to the positive control. Original Western blot images are available in Supplementary Materials. (D) Total protein isolated from EVs per one million cells. n ≥ 3; mean ± standard error; *** p < 0.001 via Student’s t-test with Welch corrections.
Impact of FSS on EVs from serum-free MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) TEM images of EVs derived from static and FSS cultures. Scale bars: 200 nm. (B) Mean particle size of EVs based on NTA. (C) Concentration of EVs derived from static and FSS cultures determined through NTA. (D) EV protein isolated following ethanol precipitation. n ≥ 3; mean ± standard error; * p < 0.05; ns = not significant via Student’s t-test with Welch corrections.
Expression of stemness markers and microRNAs in serum-free MDA-MB-231 cells and corresponding EVs with and without FSS. (A) RNA levels of stemness-related genes NANOG and OCT4 normalized to ACTB. (B) miRNA levels in static- and FSS-cultured MDA-MB-231 cells and (C) in their corresponding EVs normalized to reference miRNA marker miR-30e. n = 3 biological replicates each with 2 or 3 technical replicates; mean ± standard error; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001; ns = not significant via Student’s t-test.
Impact of EVs derived from CSC-like MDA-MB-231 cells on MCF-7 cells. (A) Uptake of PKH67-labeled EVs in MCF-7 cells. Left to right: brightfield, DAPI nuclear stain, PKH67-labeled EVs, and merged. Scale bar: 25 µm. (B) miRNA expressions of stemness-related markers in MCF-7 cells after 24 h incubation with PBS control (PBS), static cell-derived EVs (static), and FSS-derived EVs (FSS). Expressions were normalized to reference miRNA marker miR-30e. n = 3 biological replicates each with 2 or 3 technical replicates; mean ± standard error; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns = not significant via one-way ANOVA. (C) Cancer stem cell-like subpopulation (CD44⁺/CD24⁻; lower right quadrant) of MCF-7 cells after 24 h of EV introduction measured via flow cytometry (n = 3).
Impact on MCF-7 proliferation 24 h post-EV introduction. (A) Live cell counts of MCF-7 with PBS control (PBS), static cell-derived EVs (static), and FSS-derived EVs (FSS). (B) Percent-positive Ki-67 populations quantified using flow cytometry. (C) Ki-67 staining indicating proliferating cells. Left to right: DAPI nuclear stain, Ki-67, and merged. Scale bar: 50 µm. (D) ATP measurements in MCF-7 cells quantified using luminescence. (E) RNA levels of F1Fo ATP synthase c-subunit genes (ATP5G1, ATP5G2, and ATP5G3), α-subunit genes (ATP5A and ATPAF2), and β-subunit genes (ATPAF1, ATP5B, and ATP-BL) normalized to housekeeping gene ACTB. n = 3 biological replicates each with 2 or 3 technical replicates; mean ± standard error; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns = not significant via one-way ANOVA.

+1

Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Modulation of Stem-like Phenotype in Breast Cancer Cells under Fluid Shear Stress
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2024

·

45 Reads

·

1 Citation

·

Margaret E. Radcliffe

·

Joseph T. Danner

·

[...]

·

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are some of the key culprits that cause cancer metastasis and metastasis-related deaths. These cells exist in a dynamic microenvironment where they experience fluid shear stress (FSS), and the CTCs that survive FSS are considered to be highly metastatic and stem cell-like. Biophysical stresses such as FSS are also known to cause the production of extracellular vesicles (EVs) that can facilitate cell–cell communication by carrying biomolecular cargos such as microRNAs. Here, we hypothesized that physiological FSS will impact the yield of EV production, and that these EVs will have biomolecules that transform the recipient cells. The EVs were isolated using direct flow filtration with and without FSS from the MDA-MB-231 cancer cell line, and the expression of key stemness-related genes and microRNAs was characterized. There was a significantly increased yield of EVs under FSS. These EVs also contained significantly increased levels of miR-21, which was previously implicated to promote metastatic progression and chemotherapeutic resistance. When these EVs from FSS were introduced to MCF-7 cancer cells, the recipient cells had a significant increase in their stem-like gene expression and CD44⁺/CD24⁻ cancer stem cell-like subpopulation. There was also a correlated increased proliferation along with an increased ATP production. Together, these findings indicate that the presence of physiological FSS can directly influence the EVs’ production and their contents, and that the EV-mediated transfer of miR-21 can have an important role in FSS-existing contexts, such as in cancer metastasis.

Download