Marc R. Nuwer’s research while affiliated with Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and other places

Purpose These American Clinical Neurophysiology Society technical standards suggest best practices for electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) with subdural and stereotactic depth electrodes for seizure induction and mapping of brain function. Methods A working group was convened from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in ESM. PubMed searches were performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed literature. Recurrent meetings reviewed progress, built consensus by discussion, and developed evidence-based recommendations to the extent possible. Recommendations Stimulators used for ESM should have sufficient dynamic range, ability to interrupt a stimulus train, and ictal disrupt mechanism(s). Charge density should be calculated for the specific electrodes and ESM settings, the maximum safe limits being 52 to 57 μC/cm ² /phase for subdural electrodes and not established for stereotactic depth electrodes. Subdural ESM for functional mapping is typically performed at 50-Hz pulse frequency, 200- to 300-µs pulse width, 2- to 8-s train duration, and 1- to 20-mA current strength. Stereo ESM is commonly performed using 2 different pulse frequencies: 1 Hz (300–500 µs pulse width, train duration up to 30 s, and often a constant current of 3–5 mA), and 50 Hz (100–500 µs pulse width, train duration 2-8 s, and 0.5–10 mA current intensity). Conclusions This guideline provides technical standards for the performance of ESM, which will likely evolve over time with advances in technology and additional evidence (also see Graphical Abstract).

Background and Objectives High costs associated with after-hour electroencephalography (EEG) constitute a barrier for financially constrained hospitals to provide this neurodiagnostic procedure outside regular working hours. Our study aims to deepen our understanding of the cost elements involved in delivering EEG services during after-hours. Methods We accessed publicly available data sets and created a cost model depending on 3 most commonly seen staffing scenarios: (1) technologist on-site, (2) technologist on-call from home, and (3) a hybrid of the two. Results Cost of EEG depends on the volume of testing and the staffing plan. Within the various cost elements, labor cost of EEG technologists is the predominant expenditure, which varies across geographic regions and urban areas. Discussion We provide a model to explain why access to EEGs during after-hours has a substantial expense. This model provides a cost calculator tool (made available as part of this publication in eAppendix 1, links.lww.com/CPJ/A513) to estimate the cost of EEG platform based on site-specific staffing scenarios and annual volume.

The Guidelines for Qualifications of Neurodiagnostic Personnel (QNP) document has been created through the collaboration of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS), the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM), the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM), and ASET The Neurodiagnostic Society (ASET). The quality of patient care is optimized when neurophysiological procedures are performed and interpreted by appropriately trained and qualified practitioners at every level. These societies recognize that neurodiagnostics is a large field with practitioners who have entered the field through a variety of training paths. This document suggests job titles, associated job responsibilities, and the recommended levels of education, certification, experience, and ongoing education appropriate for each job. This is important because of the growth and development of standardized training programs, board certifications, and continuing education in recent years. This document matches training, education, and credentials to the various tasks required for performing and interpreting neurodiagnostic procedures. This document does not intend to restrict the practice of those already working in neurodiagnostics. It represents recommendations of these societies with the understanding that federal, state, and local regulations, as well as individual hospital bylaws, supersede these recommendations. Because neurodiagnostics is a growing and dynamic field, the authors fully intend this document to change over time.

Opioid overdose is one of the leading causes of overdose related deaths in the United States of America, accounting for 70.6% of overdose fatalities in 2019 alone. A leading cause of death among opioid overdoses is respiratory depression. Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) emerges as a novel approach of facilitating rhythmic motor activities such as locomotion and respiration. Previous studies conducted in humans and rodent models demonstrated respiratory augmentations induced by EES delivered to the dorsal cervical spinal cord. Importantly, EES at the dorsal cervical spinal cord opposes opioid-induced respiratory depression in human. To reveal the mechanism underpins how cervical EES modulate the respiratory neural circuit, we conducted this comparative study between dorsal cervical EES to the ventral EES in patients with opioid-induced respiratory suppression or depression. We hypothesize that the ventral cervical EES activates the local motor neuronal pools while the dorsal EES recruits both sensory and motor cervical circuits as well as accesses supraspinal structures such as medulla. We recruited and consented 25 patients who underwent anterior (ventral) cervical spinal cord surgery and compared the effect of ventral cervical EES to to the effect of dorsal cervical ESS in a dataset that we collected from 18 patients undergoing cervical spinal surgery. In the 25 patients, the EES was deliver to the ventral surface of spinal cord ranging from cervical level 3 to 7 (C3 to C7) for no more than 90 seconds at the optimal intensity ranging from 0.5 mA to 5 mA with stimulation frequencies 5 Hz or 30 Hz. In both the dorsal and ventral EES groups, the subjects were anesthetized with low dose or high dose remifentanil that partially or completely depressed voluntary respiration. We observed three main differences between the dorsal and ventral cervical EEST in regulating respiration in the presence of remifentanil. First, dorsal cervical EES induced the resetting of inspiratory rhythm while ventral cervical EES did not. Second, dorsal but not ventral cervical EES induced longer lasting respiratory modulation after the stimulation stopped. Third, dorsal cervical EES induced both frequency and amplitude changes of respiration while ventral cervical EES modulated the amplitude of the respiration more significantly. These observations suggest that the dorsal and ventral cervical EES facilitate respiration via different neural circuits. This work was supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse in the National Institutes of Health: R01 DA047637, Louis and Harold Price Foundation, H & H Evergreen Foundation, and J. Yang Family Foundation. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

The Guidelines for Qualifications of Neurodiagnostic Personnel (QNP) document has been created through the collaboration of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS), the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM), the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM), and ASET-The Neurodiagnostic Society (ASET). The quality of patient care is optimized when neurophysiological procedures are performed and interpreted by appropriately trained and qualified practitioners at every level. These societies recognize that neurodiagnostics is a large field with practitioners who have entered the field through a variety of training paths. This document suggests job titles, associated job responsibilities, and the recommended levels of education, certification, experience, and ongoing education appropriate for each job. This is important because of the growth and development of standardized training programs, board certifications, and continuing education in recent years. This document matches training, education, and credentials to the various tasks required for performing and interpreting neurodiagnostic procedures. This document does not intend to restrict the practice of those already working in neurodiagnostics. It represents recommendations of these societies with the understanding that federal, state, and local regulations, as well as individual hospital bylaws, supersede these recommendations. Because neurodiagnostics is a growing and dynamic field, the authors fully intend this document to change over time.

The Guidelines for Qualifications of Neurodiagnostic Personnel (QNP) document has been created through the collaboration of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS), the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM), the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM), and ASET - The Neurodiagnostic Society (ASET). The quality of patient care is optimized when neurophysiological procedures are performed and interpreted by appropriately trained and qualified practitioners at every level. These Societies recognize that Neurodiagnostics is a large field with practitioners who have entered the field through a variety of training paths. This document suggests job titles, associated job responsibilities, and the recommended levels of education, certification, experience, and ongoing education appropriate for each job. This is important because of the growth and development of standardized training programs, board certifications, and continuing education in recent years. This document matches training, education, and credentials to the various tasks required for performing and interpreting Neurodiagnostic procedures. This document does not intend to restrict the practice of those already working in Neurodiagnostics. It represents recommendations of these Societies with the understanding that federal, state, and local regulations, as well as individual hospital bylaws, supersede these recommendations. As Neurodiagnostics is a growing and dynamic field, we fully intend this document to change over time.

Surgery to correct a spinal deformity incurs a risk of injury to the spinal cord and roots. Injuries include postoperative paraplegia. Surgery for cervical myelopathy also incurs risk for postoperative motor deficits, as well as nerve injury most commonly at the C5 root. Risks can be mitigated by monitoring the nervous system during surgery. Ideally, monitoring detects an impending injury in time to intervene and correct the impairment before it becomes permanent. Monitoring includes several modalities of testing. Somatosensory evoked potentials measure axonal conduction in the spinal cord posterior columns. This can be checked almost continuously during surgery. Motor evoked potentials measure conduction along the lateral corticospinal tracts. Because motor pathway stimulation often produces a patient movement on the table, these often are tested periodically rather than continuously. Electromyography observes for spontaneous discharges accompanying injuries, and is useful to assess misplacement of pedicle screws. Literature demonstrates the usefulness of these techniques, their association with reducing motor adverse outcomes, and the relative value of the techniques. Neurophysiologic monitoring for scoliosis, kyphosis, and cervical myelopathy surgery are addressed, along with background information about those conditions.