Malcolm L. Wells’s research while affiliated with Columbia University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Figure 5. Energetic changes in TFs vs. PBPs. A, Binding pocket waters in TF structures and models. B, Waters sampled in MD simulations cluster together. C, Durations and occupancies for each water cluster in MD simulations. Red dots correspond to circled structural waters in B. D, Model for induction in LacI/GalR TFs based on conserved ∆∆Gop, IND-DNA (left), with molecular switches labeled and schematized on the right. E, Conserved mechanism of sugar response in both PBPs. F, Pan-VFT energetic relationships center on sugar interactions with binding pocket helices.
Conserved energetic changes drive function in an ancient protein fold
  • Preprint
  • File available

April 2025

·

19 Reads

Malcolm L. Wells

·

·

Daniel Sultanov

·

[...]

·

Anum Glasgow

Many protein sequences occupy similar three-dimensional structures known as protein folds. In nature, protein folds are well-conserved over the course of evolution, such that there are 100,000 times as many extant protein sequences than there are folds. Despite their common shapes, similar protein folds can adopt wide-ranging functions, raising the question: are protein folds so strongly conserved for the purpose of maintaining function-driving energetic changes in protein families? Here we show that a set of key energetic relationships in a family of bacterial transcription factors (TFs) is conserved using high-resolution hydrogen exchange/mass spectrometry, bioinformatics, X-ray crystallography, and molecular dynamics simulations. We compared the TFs to their anciently diverged structural homologs, the periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs), expecting that protein families that share the same fold and bind the same sugars would have similar energetic responses. Surprisingly, our findings reveal the opposite: the "energetic blueprints" of the PBPs and the TFs are largely distinct, with the allosteric network of the TFs evolving specifically to support the functional requirements of genome regulation, versus conserved interactions with membrane transport machinery in PBPs. These results demonstrate how the same fold can be adapted for different sense/response functions via family-specific energetic requirements - even when responding to the same chemical trigger. Understanding the evolutionarily conserved energetic blueprint for a protein family provides a roadmap for designing functional proteins de novo, and will help us treat aberrant protein behavior in conserved domains in disease-related drug targets, where engineering selectivity is challenging.

Download

Site-resolved energetic information from HX/MS experiments

August 2024

·

39 Reads

·

1 Citation

While bioinformatics reveals patterns in protein sequences and structural biology methods elucidate atomic details of protein structures, it is difficult to attain equally high-resolution energetic information about protein conformational ensembles. We present PIGEON-FEATHER, a method for calculating free energies of opening (∆Gop) at single- or near-single-amino acid resolution for protein ensembles of all sizes from hydrogen exchange/mass spectrometry (HX/MS) data. PIGEON-FEATHER disambiguates and reconstructs all experimentally measured isotopic mass envelopes using a Bayesian Monte Carlo sampling approach. We applied PIGEON-FEATHER to reveal how E. coli and human dihydrofolate reductase orthologs (ecDHFR, hDHFR) have evolved distinct ensembles tuned to their catalytic cycles, and how two competitive inhibitors of ecDHFR arrest its ensemble in different ways. Extending the method to a large protein-DNA complex, we mapped ligand-induced ensemble reweighting in the E. coli lac repressor to understand the functional switching mechanism crucial for transcriptional regulation.


Author Correction: Ligand-specific changes in conformational flexibility mediate long-range allostery in the lac repressor

July 2023

·

13 Reads


Ligands bind without dramatic structural changes in the core domain to control the structure of the DNA-binding domain allosterically
A X-ray crystal structure of dimeric LacI bound to the DNA operator. One subunit is shown in color (green: C-terminal subdomain; yellow: N-terminal subdomain; purple: DNA-binding domain) and the other subunit is shown in gray. PDB ID: 1EFA (ONPF-bound LacI without the tetramerization helix). B Overlaid structures of the core domains show similar backbone structures for apo-LacI (dark gray), IPTG-LacI (green, yellow, maroon), and ONPF-LacI (blue). PDB IDs: 1LBI (apo LacI core domain with tetramerization helix), 2P9H (IPTG-bound LacI core domain), 2PAF (ONPF-bound LacI core domain). C Overlaid structures of the ligand binding site in IPTG-LacI and ONPF-LacI reveal similar sidechain-atom positions, colored as in B. Thin sticks show amino acid sidechains. Thick sticks show ligands. D Chemical structures of ONPF, IPTG, and TMG with binding affinities to full-length LacI.
Conformational differences between IPTG-LacI and DNA-LacI
A Uptake plots for peptides marked in C with data presented as means for n = 2 individual measurements on biologically independent samples, except panel iv, for which n = 3 for IPTG-LacI and n = 5 for DNA-LacI. Error bars are standard deviations. B Comparison of fractional differences. Purple: less exchange in DNA-LacI; teal: less exchange in IPTG-LacI. Right-side labels correspond to the labels in (C, top). C Differential exchange, colored as in (B). Striped and dark gray regions indicate no data. PDB ID: 2P9H (ONPF-bound LacI without the tetramerization helix).
Structural and functional differences between IPTG-LacI and DNA-LacI
A Diagrams on the right are cross-sectioned according to the schematic on the left. Secondary structure elements are labeled according to Fig. 2C, top. Purple: less exchange in DNA-LacI; teal: less exchange in IPTG-LacI. B LacI models colored by mutational phenotype classes: IS (constitutive repression) and I⁻ (constitutive expression)¹⁹. The table summarizes mutational phenotype data as percentages of residues in differentially rigidified regions observed in HDX/MS experiments. PDB ID: 2P9H (IPTG-bound LacI core domain).
Predicted solvent-mediated hydrogen bonding networks in the ligand-binding pocket
A Deuterium uptake plots for peptides i-vi marked in B. The data represent means for n = 2 measurements on biologically independent samples, except panel iv which has n = 5 for all states, and panel v which has n = 5 for IPTG-LacI and ONPF-LacI, and n = 4 for DNA-LacI. Error bars show standard deviations. B, C ONPF-LacI (left) and IPTG-LacI (right) core domain structures colored by differences in exchange compared to apo-LacI. Green regions are rigidified as compared to apo-LacI. Dark gray indicates no data. Surfaces show predicted probabilities of residue interactions with structural water molecules. C Ligand binding sites in C. Circles indicate regions that are rigidified in IPTG-LacI but not ONPF-LacI.
Consolidated models for ligand-specific changes in the conformational ensemble in IPTG-LacI and ONPF-LacI, as compared to DNA-LacI
Schematics summarizing the rigidity of LacI core domain secondary structure elements in IPTG-LacI and ONPF-LacI as compared to DNA-LacI, with rigidified regions in each ligand-bound state shown in teal, de-rigidified regions shown in purple, and regions for which there is no data shown with stripes. Red circles show the positions of predicted structural water molecules, and red lines show the interactions of the predicted structural water molecules with atoms in ligands or amino acid residues. Orange lines represent hydrogen bonds uniquely formed among protein atoms in each ligand-bound state as compared to DNA-LacI. Rigidified loops in each schematic are thick for emphasis. A In IPTG-LacI, hydrogen bond formation at the ligand-binding pocket periphery promotes interactions between the N- and C-terminal subdomains of the core, which causes small structural rearrangements in the N-terminal subdomains (arrows) to increase flexibility in the hinge helix (black X). B In ONPF-LacI, the C-terminal core subdomain is not extensively perturbed as compared to DNA-LacI. However, N-terminal core subdomain loops become more structured, which may stabilize the interface of the core domain with the DNA-binding domain to bind the operator.
Ligand-specific changes in conformational flexibility mediate long-range allostery in the lac repressor

March 2023

·

146 Reads

·

23 Citations

Biological regulation ubiquitously depends on protein allostery, but the regulatory mechanisms are incompletely understood, especially in proteins that undergo ligand-induced allostery with few structural changes. Here we used hydrogen-deuterium exchange with mass spectrometry (HDX/MS) to map allosteric effects in a paradigm ligand-responsive transcription factor, the lac repressor (LacI), in different functional states (apo, or bound to inducer, anti-inducer, and/or DNA). Although X-ray crystal structures of the LacI core domain in these states are nearly indistinguishable, HDX/MS experiments reveal widespread differences in flexibility. We integrate these results with modeling of protein-ligand-solvent interactions to propose a revised model for allostery in LacI, where ligand binding allosterically shifts the conformational ensemble as a result of distinct changes in the rigidity of secondary structures in the different states. Our model provides a mechanistic basis for the altered function of distal mutations. More generally, our approach provides a platform for characterizing and engineering protein allostery. Using hydrogen-deuterium exchange, the authors propose a model explaining how a classic transcription factor undergoes changes in its conformational ensemble in response to different ligands.

Citations (2)


... Despite their shared topologies, in experimentally solved structures, the sugar-induced conformational changes in the VFT domains of TFs are subtler than in PBPs due to the dimer state of the TFs (12,13,15). The family's namesake TF, the lac repressor (LacI), reweights specific intramolecular contacts to switch between its transcriptionally repressed and active functional states without dramatic changes to the VFT domain structure (16)(17)(18). The DBD of each TF has a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif that is connected by a hinge helix to the VFT domain. ...

Reference:

Conserved energetic changes drive function in an ancient protein fold
Site-resolved energetic information from HX/MS experiments

... A computational design protocol for sensing the nitazene family of synthetic opioids Design of an allosteric biosensor requires solving the challenge of protein-ligand binder design consistent with, and constrained by, a structural definition of the transduction mechanism (27). A major advantage of redesigning PYR1 for new ligand sensing is that the receptor has an exceptionally well understood and characterized CID mechanism, where a bound water maintains hydrogen bonds between the ligand, the PYR1 receptor, and the HAB1 protein (17) (Figure 1A,B). ...

Ligand-specific changes in conformational flexibility mediate long-range allostery in the lac repressor