M.D. Niemetz’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Reforming UN Decision-Making Procedures: Promoting a Deliberative System for Global Peace and Security
  • Article

March 2015

·

170 Reads

·

9 Citations

M.D. Niemetz

The institutional procedures for the UN's decision-making on issues of global peace and security, first and foremost the Security Council (SC), were conceived with the objective of enabling a swift but internationally coordinated response to irregular situations of crises. Today, however, the UN is constantly involved in situations of conflict and has expanded its range of activities. This book offers a concrete and practically applicable answer to the question of how to reform the UN and increase the legitimacy of the UN's decision-making procedures on issues of global peace and security. In order to provide this answer, it connects the minutia of institutional design with the abstract principals of democratic theory in a systematic and reproducible method, thereby enabling a clear normative evaluation of even the smallest technical detail of reform. This evaluation demonstrates that there is a range of feasible proposals for reform that could improve the SC's accountability both to the General Assembly and to the general public, that could increase the opportunities for effective input from the UN membership and NGOs. This book will be of interest to students and scholars of the United Nations, International Organizations and regional governance.

Citations (1)


... While, for Adler-Nissen and Pouliot, this practice was a mark of competence, for practitioners among the E10 states, penholding is a practice that weakens deliberation; it has to be endured rather than embraced. These interviewees reported limited time for consultation once elected members are privy to the text, a sense that deadlines were manufactured to close down discussion and that the role of elected members was often to 'rubber-stamp' decisions that had already been made in negotiations between permanent members (Interviews 10, 14 and 18; see also Keating, 2016;Niemetz, 2015;Security Council Report, 2014;Wenaweser, 2016). The collapse of the fragile consensus that the P3 created on Resolution 1973 must be understood in this context. ...

Reference:

The purpose of United Nations Security Council practice: Contesting competence claims in the normative context created by the Responsibility to Protect
Reforming UN Decision-Making Procedures: Promoting a Deliberative System for Global Peace and Security
  • Citing Article
  • March 2015