M.D. Hurd’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Anchoring and Acquiescence Bias in Measuring Assets in Household Surveys
  • Article

January 1999

·

3 Reads

·

52 Citations

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

M.D. Hurd

Cognitive psychology has identified and studied extensively a number of cognitive anomalies that may be important for the assessment of the economic status of individuals and households. In particular the use of brackets to elicit information about income and assets in surveys of households can interact with acquiescence bias and anchoring to cause bias in the estimates of the distributions of income and assets. This paper uses data from the Health and Retirement Study and the Asset and Health Dynamics Study to find that, as predicted by psychology, bracketing can produce bias in population estimates of assets.

Citations (1)


... We cannot exclude the possibility of having occurred some interviewer biases, such as question-order bias (Bradburn & Mason, 1964) or wording bias (Drayton, 1954). Likewise, also respondents might have fallen prey to social desirability bias (Zerbe & Paulhus, 1987), to the Hawthorne effect (Diaper, 1990;Landsberger, 1958), or to acquiescence bias (Hurd & Kapteyn, 2000). Being aware of these biases, significant effort was put into the design of a comprehensive semi-structured interview guide followed by thorough validation by a second researcher. ...

Reference:

Advancing the practice of Decision Conferencing in the digital age: insights from a qualitative study with OR practitioners
Anchoring and Acquiescence Bias in Measuring Assets in Household Surveys
  • Citing Article
  • January 1999

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty