M. C. Malin’s research while affiliated with Malin Space Science Systems and other places

Plain Language Summary Water and carbon dioxide each form high‐altitude (40–100 km) clouds on Mars. Clouds at those altitudes on Earth can be noctilucent—night‐shining—when they are illuminated by sunlight while the world below is dark. Noctilucent clouds have been seen on Mars but were not expected around the Curiosity rover site. Curiosity rover images from early southern autumn show clouds that are not only noctilucent, but they are also colorful with a mother‐of‐pearl appearance due to iridescence—such clouds are called nacreous on Earth. Curiosity's environmental data record shows that the clouds have consistently formed near sunset in that season. By looking at the timing of when Mars' shadow falls on the cirrus‐like clouds, we found that they are 50–80 km high and are probably carbon dioxide ice, but there are lower layers of wave‐like clouds that may be water ice. The pastel red, orange, green, and blue fringes of the clouds, which would be easily visible to an astronaut on Mars, help us understand the size of the cloud particles and how they grow and change.

Two >130-meter-diameter impact craters formed on Mars during the later half of 2021. These are the two largest fresh impact craters discovered by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter since operations started 16 years ago. The impacts created two of the largest seismic events (magnitudes greater than 4) recorded by InSight during its 3-year mission. The combination of orbital imagery and seismic ground motion enables the investigation of subsurface and atmospheric energy partitioning of the impact process on a planet with a thin atmosphere and the first direct test of martian deep-interior seismic models with known event distances. The impact at 35°N excavated blocks of water ice, which is the lowest latitude at which ice has been directly observed on Mars.

On Mars, near the equator, much of the terrain in Gale Crater consists of bedrock outcrops separated by relatively smooth, uniform regolith surfaces. In scattered sites, however, distinct patterns—in the form and texture of the ground surface—contrast sharply with the typical terrain and with eolian bedforms. This paper focuses on these diverse, intriguing ground patterns. They include ∼1 to >10 m‐long linear disruptions of uniform regolith surfaces, alignments, and other arrangements of similar‐sized rock fragments and shallow, ∼0.1 m‐wide sandy troughs 1–10 m in length. Similar features were recognized early in the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission, but they received only limited attention until Curiosity, the MSL rover, encountered striking examples in the Glen Torridon region. Herein, the ground patterns are illustrated with rover images. Potential mechanisms are briefly discussed in the context of the bedrock composition and atmospheric conditions documented by Curiosity. The evidence suggests that the patterns are active forms of spontaneous granular organization. It leads to the hypothesis that the patterns arise and develop from miniscule, inferred cyclic expansion and contraction of the bedrock and regolith, likely driven by oscillating transfers of energy and moisture between the atmosphere and the terrain. The hypothesis has significant implications for studies of contemporary processes on Mars on both sides of the atmosphere‐lithosphere interface. The ground patterns, as well as ripples and dunes formed by the wind, constitute remarkable extra‐terrestrial examples of granular self‐organization, complex phenomena well known in diverse systems on Earth.

We present a catalog of new impacts on Mars. These craters formed in the last few decades, constrained with repeat orbital imaging. Crater diameters range from 58 m down to <1 m. For each impact, we report whether it formed a single crater or a cluster (58% clusters); albedo features of the blast zone (88% halos; 64% linear rays; 10% arcuate rays; majority dark‐toned; 4% light‐toned; 14% dual‐toned); and exposures of ice (4% definite; 2% possible). We find no trends in the occurrences of clusters with latitude, elevation, or impact size. Albedo features do not depend on atmospheric fragmentation. Halos are more prevalent at lower elevations, indicating an atmospheric pressure dependence; and around smaller impacts, which could be an observational bias. Linear rays are more likely to form from larger impacts into more consolidated material and may be enhanced by lower atmospheric pressure at higher elevations. Light‐ and dual‐toned blast zones occur in specific regions and more commonly around larger impacts, indicating excavation of compositionally distinct material. Surfaces covered with bright dust lacking cohesion are favored to form detectable surface features. The slope of the cumulative size frequency distribution for this data set is 2.2 for diameters >8 m (differential slope 2.9), significantly shallower than the slope of new lunar craters. We believe that no systematic biases exist in the Martian data set sufficient to explain the discrepancy. This catalog is complete at the time of writing, although observational biases exist, and new discoveries continue.

Wave modeling and analysis of sedimentary structures were used to evaluate whether four examples of symmetrical, reversing, or straight‐crested bedforms in Gale crater sandstones are preserved wave ripples; deposition by waves would demonstrate that the lake was not covered by ice at that time. Wave modeling indicates that regardless of atmospheric density, winds that exceeded the threshold of aeolian sand transport could have generated waves capable of producing nearshore wave ripples in most grain sizes of sand. Reversing 3‐m‐wavelength bedforms in the Kimberley formation are interpreted not as wave ripples but rather as large aeolian ripples that formed in an atmosphere approximately as thin as at present. These exhumed bedforms define many of the ridges at outcrops that appear striated in satellite images. At Kimberley these bedforms demonstrably underlie and therefore predate subaqueous beds, suggesting that a thin atmosphere existed at least temporarily before subaqueous deposition ceased in the crater. The other three candidate wave ripples (Square Top, Hunda, and Voe) are consistent with modeled waves, but other origins cannot be excluded. The predominance of flat‐laminated (non‐rippled) beds in the lacustrine Murray formation suggests that some aspect of the lake was not conducive to formation or preservation of recognizable wave ripples. Water depths may generally have been too deep, lakebed sediment may have been too fine‐grained, the lake may have been smaller than modeled, or the lake may have been covered by ice.

Daily, global wide angle imaging of Mars clouds in MARCI (MARs Color Imager, (Malin et al., 2008)) ultraviolet and visible bands reveals the spatial/seasonal distributions and physical characteristics of perihelion cloud trails (PCT); a class of high altitude (40-50 km), horizontally extended (200-1000 km, trending W to WSW) water ice clouds formed over specific southern low-to-mid latitude (5S-40S), mesoscale (~50 km) locations during the Mars perihelion, southern summer season. PCT were first reported in association with rim regions of Valles Marineris (Clancy et al., 2009). The current study employs MARCI 2007-2011 imaging to sample the broader distributions and properties of PCT; and indicates several distinct locations of peak occurrences, including SW Arsia Mons, elevated regions of Syria, Solis, and Thaumasia Planitia, along Valles Marineris margins, and the NE rim of Hellas Basin. PCT are present over Mars solar longitudes (L S ) of 210-310°, in late morning to mid afternoon hours (10am-3pm), and are among the brightest and most distinctive clouds exhibited during the perihelion portion of the Mars orbit. Their locations (i.e., eastern margin origins) correspond to strong local elevation gradients, and their timing to peak solar heating conditions (perihelion, subsolar latitudes and midday local times). They occur approximately on a daily basis among all locations identified (i.e., not daily at a single location). Based on cloud surface shadow analyses, PCT form at 40-50 km aeroid altitudes, where water vapor is generally at near-saturation conditions in this perihelion period (e.g. Millour et al., 2014). They exhibited notable absences during periods of planet encircling and regional dust storm activity in 2007 and 2009, respectively, presumably due to reduced water saturation conditions above 35-40 km altitudes associated with increased dust heating over the vertically extended atmosphere (e.g., Neary et al., 2019). PCT exhibit smaller particle sizes (R eff =0.2-0.5μm) than typically exhibited in the lower atmosphere, and incorporate significant fractions of available water vapor at these altitudes. PCT ice particles are inferred to form continuously (over ~4 hours) at their PCT eastern origins, associated with localized updrafts, and are entrained in upper level zonal/meridional winds (towards W or WSW with ~50 m/sec speeds at 40-50 km altitudes) to create long, linear cloud trails. PCT cloud formation is apparently forced in the lower atmosphere (≤10-15 km) by strong updrafts associated with distinctive topographic gradients, such as simulated in mesoscale studies (e.g., Tyler and Barnes, 2015) and indicated by the surface-specific PCT locations. These lower scale height updrafts are proposed to generate vertically propagating gravity waves (GW), leading to PCT formation above ~40 km altitudes where water vapor saturation conditions promote vigorous cloud ice formation. Recent mapping of GW amplitudes at ~25 km altitudes, from Mars Climate Sounder 15 μm radiance variations (Heavens et al., 2020), in fact demonstrates close correspondences to the detailed spatial distributions of observed PCT, relative to other potential factors such as surface albedo and surface elevation (or related boundary layer depths).

The erosion rates and mechanisms operating on Mount Sharp in Gale crater, Mars were assessed via experiments performed by the SAM instrument to determine the cosmogenic noble gas contents of Murray mudstone formation samples Mojave 2 and Quela. Previous measurements of samples from the Aeolis Palus depression between Mount Sharp and the north rim of Gale crater indicate that scarp retreat-generated surfaces formed within the last 100 Ma. In contrast, Mojave 2 yielded exposure ages of 1,320±240 (³He), 910±420 (²¹Ne), and 310±60 Ma (³⁶Ar). Quela gave a ³He age of 1,460±200 Ma; ²¹Ne and ³⁶Ar from this sample could not be quantified due to isobaric interferences. The discordant and young ³⁶Ar exposure age in Mojave 2 is likely the result of interaction with water which dissolved the chlorine-bearing host phases of this nuclide. The most probable exposure scenario is that both Mojave 2 and Quela have been at the surface for the most recent ∼1 Ga after the overlying few meters of rock were removed in a geologically rapid exhumation episode. Based on local geomorphology, scarp retreat is the most likely mechanism for the exposure at these two sites. The exposure ages measured throughout Curiosity's traverse indicate that the net removal of rock has proceeded more recently on Aeolis Palus than on the lower slopes of Mount Sharp. The implied differential erosion rate is insufficient to explain how Mount Sharp formed, even over billions of years. Instead, given that the surfaces on Mount Sharp have existed for >1 Ga, the mountain must have formed early, likely during the Hesperian. This study provides direct quantitative support for inferences based on crater counts that Mount Sharp had eroded to close to its current form before onset of the Amazonian.