Luuk Jungerling’s scientific contributions

What is this page?

This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)

Fig. 1. Average plant height (± SE) over time for plants grown under control light (CL) or CL supplemented with far-red light (+FR) for run 1 of the experiment (control n = 27, far-red n = 24). A repeated measures general linear model indicates a significant effect of both plant age (F(16, 816) = 6357.67, p < 0.001) and light treatment (F(1, 51) = 469.34, p < 0.001), as well as a significant interaction between age and light treatment (F(16, 816) = 469.34, p < 0.001).
Fig. 2. Average number of flower buds (± SE) over time, presented per truss, for plants grown under control light (CL) or CL supplemented with far-red light (+FR) during run 1 of the experiment (control n = 27, far-red n = 24). More details on the statistics from a repeated measures general linear model are presented in Table S1.
Fig. 5. Effects of exposure to supplemental far-red light (+FR) or control light (CL) on the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by tomato flowers. (a) Multivariate comparison using orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) between flowers of the second truss (T2) exposed to +FR or CL (n = 10 per group) based on the quantitative results of the volatiles displayed in a two-dimensional score plot. (b) Loading plot indicating the contribution of each VOC to the separation between +FR T2 and CL T2 samples. (c) Multivariate comparison using principal component analysis (PCA) between flowers of the fifth truss (T5) exposed to
Fig. 8. Average percentage of bumblebees (± SE) foraging on tomato plants growing under control light (CL) or CL supplemented with far-red light (+FR) at fixed time points (n = 56) during run 1 of the experiment. The percentage of bumblebees foraging on +FR treated plants was significantly higher (Z(1) = 6.69, p < 0.001).
Fig. 10. Total number of bumblebees choosing either light source in a two-choice set-up. P-values in bold indicate a statistically significant preference for one of the light sources (two-sided binominal test).
Supplemental far-red light influences flowering traits and interactions with a pollinator in tomato crops
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2023

·

143 Reads

·

7 Citations

Environmental and Experimental Botany

·

Femke van Doesburg

·

Luuk Jungerling

·

[...]

·

Download

Citations (1)

... At low R/FR, plant height, stem diameter, and biomass of tomato seedlings increased, while chlorophyll content decreased [49]. Adding far-red light also accelerated flowering and increased the number of flowers per truss in tomato plants [50]. And, FR can inhibit the growth of lateral roots by regulating the transport of gibberellins [51]. ...

Reference:

The Impact of Daily Light Integral from Artificial Lighting on Tomato Seedling Cultivation in Plant Factory
Supplemental far-red light influences flowering traits and interactions with a pollinator in tomato crops

Environmental and Experimental Botany

·

Femke van Doesburg

·

Luuk Jungerling

·

[...]

·