Louis Schneider’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings.
  • Article

June 1964

·

151 Reads

·

1,366 Citations

American Sociological Review

Louis Schneider

·

Erving Goffman

Citations (1)


... The significance of in-person openings cannot be overstated. In addition to enabling participants to establish the nature of the encounter and its organization-what will be done and/or talked about, in what order (Pillet-Shore, 2018a:214-215), copresent openings are a locus for: managing interpersonal access (e.g., ratifying or denying a face engagement; Goffman, 1963;1971), accomplishing presence validation and threat denial (Youssouf, Grimshaw & Bird, 1976), displaying (un)availability for collaborative action (Goffman, 1963;Robinson, 1998), meeting new people (Pillet-Shore, 2011), monitoring for and establishing joint attention on diverse and distributed manifestations of the self (e.g., how persons look, smell, and sound; Pillet-Shore, 2021), including or excluding newcomers (Corsaro, 1979;Pillet-Shore, 2010), and displaying how one is doing/feeling at the start of an interaction (Pillet-Shore, 2018b). Holistically, participants use the in-person opening phase to display a stance toward-and thereby actively (re)constitute-their social relationship on-the-spot and in-the-moment through the choices they make about how they design their social actions for one another (Pillet-Shore, 2006;2008;2011;2012;2018a;2018b;2021). ...

Reference:

'Routines' and 'Formulaic Language' in Conversation Analysis
Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings.
  • Citing Article
  • June 1964

American Sociological Review