July 2023
·
19 Reads
·
12 Citations
What is this page?
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
Publications (9)
November 2022
·
5 Reads
·
1 Citation
Archaeological Dialogues
May 2022
·
2 Reads
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
November 2021
·
6 Reads
European Journal of Archaeology
June 2021
·
11 Reads
Current Swedish Archaeology
June 2021
·
2 Reads
Current Swedish Archaeology
June 2021
·
242 Reads
·
28 Citations
Current Swedish Archaeology
November 2018
·
13 Reads
Archaeology is inherently transdisciplinary as a discipline. In addition to data, it requires the methodological and interpretative work of science, humanities, and social science to puzzle together the fragmented pieces of the past into a coherent story about human lives and deaths. This entry argues that while archaeology is currently benefitting from an intensification of cross‐disciplinary collaborations, we need to maintain this direction in the discipline by developing stronger literacy across the subdisciplinary boundaries and foster a disciplinary culture that explicitly credits the different sides equally.
November 2018
·
200 Reads
·
50 Citations
Norwegian Archaeological Review
Through a critical review of inter- and transdisciplinarity in archaeology, this paper examines the power relationships within archaeology with regards to collaborators within and beyond the academy. By making a case for an archaeology that openly collaborates across disciplines and knowledge systems, but also more firmly articulates itself and its value, the paper makes a case for an engaged and problematising archaeology for the future. © 2018, © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Citations (3)
... This analytical gap can be attributed to various factors, including but not limited to restricted access to specialized expertise, complex ethical considerations, funding and the prioritization of other research areas within the hosting institutions. In recent years, the role of these remains has come under increasing scrutiny, with debates focusing on the ethical imperatives of their study for identification and potential repatriation to descendant communities (Ayau et al., 2018;Licata et al., 2020;Nilsson Stutz, 2023). In cases where repatriation is not feasible, respectful alternatives such as the utilization and display of replicas have been proposed to balance ethical considerations with the preservation of knowledge. ...
- Citing Article
July 2023
... Based on the assumption that differences in grave inventories display the social status of the deceased, the New Archaeology proclaimed that the sociopolitical organization can be deducted with the help of burial analysis (Binford, 1971;Saxe, 1970). This simplified approach has been, and still is, criticized (Härke, 1989;Nilsson Stutz, 2016;Parker Pearson, 2003). The burial practice, which includes the body treatment after death, ceremonies, the grave furniture, and grave goods, is a complex cultural construct which has to be understood holistically in order to make an overarching statement about the individuals buried. ...
- Citing Article
- Full-text available
June 2021
Current Swedish Archaeology
... See also Steiner 2015b. 54 Darian-Smith and McCarty, 2016, 3-7;Stutz 2018, 53-54. 55 Miles 2019 Hodge and Kreps 2024, 177-79. ...
Reference:
The Unwavering Divide
- Citing Article
- Full-text available
November 2018
Norwegian Archaeological Review