Liangliang Dai’s research while affiliated with Nanjing Medical University and other places

Purpose To investigate the effect of the postural drainage lithotripsy system developed by our experimental team on the vital signs of patient with urinary stones during the stone removal process. Methods Four groups of 15 subjects (0°, 10°, 40°, and 70°) were subjected to different angles of head-down tilt to measure middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), cerebrovascular conductance coefficient (CVCi), intracranial pressure (nICP), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). Results As the angle of HDT changed, MCAv values, nICP values, CVCi values, HR values, and MAP values changed significantly (all P ≤ 0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. During 10°HDT, despite a slight increase in nICP, the other measurements remained stable. During 40°HDT, only the MCAv values did not change significantly, whereas the rest of the measures were significantly altered. During 70°HDT, all indicators changed significantly. Conclusions The significant alterations in cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics induced during the treatment of renal residual fragments with postural drainage should be used with caution in individuals with cerebrovascular accidents. China Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2300070671; Registration date: 2023-04-18.

Objectives We developed a postural drainage lithotripsy system (PDLS) that can provide an individualized inversion and overturning angle and uses gravity to remove residual fragments (RFs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different targeted calyces on treating multi-site stones in PDLS. Methods A total of 20 stones with different sizes and diameters of 0–4 mm were placed in the kidney model through ureteroscopy, and 20 stones were evenly scattered in the middle calyx and the lower calyx of the model. The ventral-middle calyx, the dorsal-middle calyx, the ventral-lower calyx, and the dorsal-lower calyx were used as the targeted calyx of PDLS to treat multi-site stones. During treatment, if the stone moved from the starting position of the renal calyx to the ureteropelvic junction, it was recorded as “passing through.” The clearance rate was recorded, and the efficacy of different targeted calyxes in the treatment of multiple-site calyx was compared. Each model was treated with four different targeted calyxes, and 20 models were tested 80 times. Results When the lower calyx was the targeted calyx, the total stone clearance rate was higher than when the middle calyx was the locating calyx (94.5 vs. 64%, P = 0.000), and the result was statistically significant. Conclusions Choosing the lower calyx as the targeted calyx, we can obtain a better stone clearance rate. However, there is no significant difference between the ventral lower calyx and the dorsal lower calyx.