Leonor Rebelo’s research while affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


DA terminals in TS encode a PE signal during associative fear learning
a Schematic of the surgical procedure. b Example histological image showing expression of GCaMP (green), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red) at DA terminals and DAPI (blue) staining in TS. The white vertical track indicates the optical fiber placement in TS. ASt amygdalostriatal transition area, BLA basolateral amygdala, CEA central nucleus of the amygdala, GP globus pallidus. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. c Top: example histological image. SNc substantia nigra pars compacta, SNL substantia nigra lateralis, VTA ventral tegmental area. Scale bar: 0.25 mm. Bottom: confocal images showing expression of GCaMP and TH staining and the merged image. Scale bar: 20 μm. d Example of change in fluorescence (dF/F) over time. Scale bar: 5 s, 0.5 dF/F. e Top: schematic of the behavioral protocol. Hab: tone habituation, FC: fear conditioning. Bottom: schematic of CS and US presentations. Schematic reprinted from ref. ²⁸, copyright (2023), with permission from Elsevier. f Freezing to the CS (n = 13 mice) during Hab, FC and Fear Recall. g Top: average activity around each CS during Hab, FC and Fear Recall across all mice (n = 13). The heat map shows response amplitudes (dF/F). Bottom: average change in fluorescence around the time of CS (gray area). The red area during FC represents the US presentation. h Change in fluorescence around each CS and US during FC in an example animal. Scale bar: 2.5 s, 0.5 dF/F. i Left: comparison of average change in fluorescence during CS1 and CS5 of FC (n = 13, **P = 0.0017, two-sided signed-rank test). Right: comparison of average change in fluorescence during US1 and US5 of FC (n = 13, *P = 0.013, two-sided signed-rank test). j Average change in fluorescence during the CS for Hab and Fear Recall (n = 13, ***P = 0.0007, two-sided signed-rank test). k Scatter plot showing CS responses of each recording site during Hab and Fear Recall. The dashed line indicates the unity line. Data points below the unity line represent larger CS responses during Fear Recall. Shaded regions and error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Activity of DA terminals in TS in response to CSs, aversive USs, and rewards that are unpredicted
a Top schematic of the behavioral protocol for unpaired training. Hab tone habituation. Bottom: Schematic of CS and US presentations during Hab, Unpaired Training, and Testing sessions. b Behavioral freezing to the CS (n = 6 mice) during Hab (average of 10 CSs), Unpaired Training and Testing sessions (average of 10 CSs). c Average change in fluorescence from recording sites in TS (n = 7) around the time of CS (gray area) during Hab, and Testing. d Comparison of average change in fluorescence in the 5 s after CS onset during Hab and Testing (n = 7, P = 0.31, two-sided signed-rank test). e Scatter plot showing CS responses of each recording site during Hab and Testing. The dashed line indicates the unity line. Data points below the unity line represent larger CS responses during Testing. f Average change in fluorescence from recording sites in TS (n = 9) around the time of CS (gray area) and US (red area) during Predicted and Unpredicted US presentations. g Comparison of average change in fluorescence during US presentation for Predicted and Unpredicted USs (n = 9, **P = 0.0078, two-sided signed-rank test). h Scatter plot showing US responses of each recording site during Predicted and Unpredicted US presentations. The dashed line indicates the unity line. Data points below the unity line represent larger responses for the Unpredicted US. i Schematic of the reward task. Animals received reward randomly 50% of the time after entering the noseport. Schematic reprinted from ref. ²⁸, copyright (2023), with permission from Elsevier. j Average change in fluorescence during rewarded noseport entries (NE) from all recording sites (n = 19). k Average change in fluorescence in the 3 s after noseport entry during rewarded NE (n = 19). l Scatter plot showing responses from each recording site (n = 19) during Unpredicted US and reward presentations. The dashed line indicates the unity line. Data points below the unity line represent larger responses for Unpredicted US. Shaded regions and error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
DA release dynamics in TS during associative fear learning and reward task
a Schematic of the surgical procedure. b Example histological image showing expression of dLight (green), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red) and DAPI (blue) staining. White vertical track indicates the optical fiber placement. ASt amygdalostriatal transition area, BLA basolateral amygdala, CEA central nucleus of the amygdala, GP globus pallidus. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. c Schematic of the behavioral protocol. d Freezing to the CS (n = 8 mice) during Hab, FC and Fear Recall. e Top: Average dLight activity around each CS during Hab, FC and Fear Recall across all recording sites (n = 10). The heat map shows response amplitudes (dF/F). Bottom: average change in fluorescence around the time of CS presentation (gray area). The red area during FC represents the US presentation. f Left: comparison of average change in fluorescence during CS1 and CS5 of FC (n = 10, **P = 0.008, two-sided signed-rank test). Right: comparison of average change in fluorescence during US1 and US5 of FC (n = 10, **P = 0.009, two-sided signed-rank test). g Left: average change in fluorescence in the 5 s after CS onset during Hab and Fear Recall (**P = 0.002, two-sided signed-rank test). Right: scatter plot showing CS responses of each recording site (n = 10) during Hab and Fear Recall. Data points below the unity line represent larger CS responses during Fear Recall. h Schematic of the reward task. Animals received reward 50% of the time after entering the noseport. Schematic reprinted from ref. ²⁸, copyright (2023), with permission from Elsevier. i Average change in fluorescence during rewarded noseport entries (NE, n = 10). j Average change in fluorescence in the 3 s after noseport entry during rewarded NE (n = 10). k Scatter plot showing responses from each recording site (n = 10) during unpredicted US (first US of FC) and unpredicted reward. Data points below the unity line represent larger responses for Unpredicted US. Shaded regions and error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
TS-projecting DA neurons are required selectively for the acquisition of cued associative fear learning
a Schematic of the surgical procedure. b Example sections showing tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, green) and DAPI (blue) staining in saline (top, left) and 6-OHDA (bottom, left) groups. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. Close-up images showing TH-staining in TS (middle) and the amygdala (right; ASt, amygdalostriatal transition area; BLA, basolateral amygdala; CEA, central amygdala) in saline (top) and 6-OHDA (bottom) groups. c Schematic of the protocol. d Freezing to the CS for saline (n = 12) and 6-OHDA (n = 10) groups (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, FC: main effect of group: F1,80 = 7.84, P = 0.011; fear recall: main effect of group: F1,80 = 18.60, P = 0.0003). e Left: freezing to the last CS during FC (two-sided t-test, t(20) = 3.85, P = 0.001). Right: freezing to the first CS of fear recall (two-sided t-test, t(20) = 4.68, P = 0.0001). f Schematic of the protocol. g Freezing to the CS for saline (n = 8) and 6-OHDA (n = 8) groups (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, FC: no main effect of group: F1,56 = 1.37, P = 0.26; fear recall: no main effect of group: F1,56 = 0.12, P = 0.72). h Freezing to the last CS during FC (left, two-sided t-test, t(14) = 0.06, P = 0.95) and to the first CS during fear recall (right, two-sided t-test, t(14) = 0.07, P = 0.94). i Schematic of the protocol. j Schematic of the task. Schematic reprinted from ref. ²⁸, copyright (2023), with permission from Elsevier. k Freezing to the context in control (n = 7) and 6-OHDA (n = 7) groups. (two-sided t-tests: Context Hab, P = 0.14; Context Test, P = 0.38). l Schematic of the protocol. m Schematic of the task. Schematic reprinted from ref. ²⁸, copyright (2023), with permission from Elsevier. n Percent rewarded CSs for saline (n = 8) and 6-OHDA (n = 7) groups (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, no main effect of group: F1,52 = 1.7, P = 0.21). o Percent rewarded CSs during the first and last days (saline, n = 8; 6-OHDA, n = 7). Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Temporally-precise activation of DA terminals in TS enhances associative fear learning
a Schematic of the surgery. b Example histological image showing expression of ChR2-EYFP (green), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, red), and DAPI (blue) staining in TS. White vertical tracks indicate optical fiber placements. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. c Top: example image of the midbrain showing expression of ChR2-EYFP, TH, and DAPI staining. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. Bottom: confocal images. Scale bar: 20 μm. d Schematic of the behavioral protocol. Schematic of optogenetic excitation for US-Paired (e), No-US-Control (f), CS-Paired (g), and ITI-Control (h) groups. i Freezing to the CS in ChR2 (n = 12), EYFP (n = 8) and No-US-Control (n = 4) groups (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, FC: main effect of group: F2,84 = 12.97, P = 0.0002; Fear recall: main effect of group: F2,84 = 21.99, P < 0.0001). j Left: freezing to the last-CS of FC (one-way ANOVA, F2,23 = 19.78, P < 0.0001). Right: freezing to the first-CS of fear recall (one-way ANOVA, F2,23 = 17.16, P < 0.0001). k Freezing to the CS in ChR2 (n = 7), EYFP (n = 6) and ITI-Control (n = 4) groups (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, FC: main effect of group: F2,56 = 11.04, P = 0.0013; fear recall: main effect of group: F2,56 = 5.77, P = 0.014). l Left: freezing to the last-CS of FC (one-way ANOVA, F2,16 = 19.78, P < 0.0001). Right: freezing to the first-CS of fear recall (one-way ANOVA, F2,16 = 3.86, P = 0.04). Top: schematic of the task. Bottom: (m), time spent in laser ON minus laser OFF side for EYFP (n = 8) and ChR2 (n = 8) groups during the real-time place preference test (P = 0.56, two-sided t-test). n Velocity (left) and time spent in the center of the open field (right) for EYFP (n = 8) and ChR2 (n = 8) groups. o time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus maze for EYFP (n = 8) and ChR2 (n = 8) groups. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

+4

Dopamine prediction error signaling in a unique nigrostriatal circuit is critical for associative fear learning
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2025

·

16 Reads

·

1 Citation

Daphne Zafiri

·

·

Eloah S. De Biasi

·

[...]

·

Learning by experience that certain cues in the environment predict danger is crucial for survival. How dopamine (DA) circuits drive this form of associative learning is not fully understood. Here, in male mice, we demonstrate that DA neurons projecting to a unique subregion of the dorsal striatum, the posterior tail of the striatum (TS), encode a prediction error (PE) signal during associative fear learning. These DA neurons are necessary specifically during acquisition of fear learning, but not once the fear memory is formed, and are not required for forming cue-reward associations. Notably, temporally-precise inhibition or excitation of DA terminals in TS impairs or enhances fear learning, respectively. Furthermore, neuronal activity in TS is crucial for the acquisition of associative fear learning and learning-induced activity patterns in TS critically depend on DA input. Together, our results reveal that DA PE signaling in a non-canonical nigrostriatal circuit is important for driving associative fear learning.

Download

Dopamine Prediction Error Signaling in a Unique Nigrostriatal Circuit is Critical for Associative Fear Learning

December 2023

·

34 Reads

·

2 Citations

Learning by experience that certain cues in the environment predict danger is crucial for survival. How dopamine (DA) circuits drive this form of associative learning is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that DA neurons projecting to a unique subregion of the striatum, the posterior tail of the striatum (TS), encode an aversive prediction error (PE) signal during associative fear learning. These DA neurons are necessary specifically during acquisition of fear learning, but not once the fear memory is formed, and are not required for forming cue-reward associations. Notably, temporally-precise excitation of DA terminals in TS is sufficient to enhance fear learning. Furthermore, neuronal activity in TS is crucial for acquisition of associative fear learning and learning-induced activity patterns in TS critically depend on DA input. Together, our results reveal that DA PE signaling in a non-canonical nigrostriatal circuit is crucial for driving associative fear learning.