July 2019
·
267 Reads
·
2 Citations

·

·

·
[...]
·

Background: Pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia usually receive a combination of broad spectrum antimicrobials. Treatment without aminoglycoside seems to have advantages. Objective: To compare the efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin versus piperacillin/tazobactam. Methods: Randomized, open label, controlled clinical trial. Sample size for an efficacy of 55%, and delta of 25%; 80 episodes were required for each group. Selection criteria were patients with febrile neutropenia, candidates to receive parenteral antimicrobial treatment; they were randomized to one of two groups, piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin (Group A), or piperacillin/tazobactam (Group B). The outcomes were failure, adverse events and death. Mantel-Haenszel chi squaretest and exact Fisher test were used. Reduction of relative and absolute risk (RRR and ARR), 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%) and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. Results: 88 Episodes were analyzed in group A and 76 in group B. There was no statistical difference in general characteristics of patients or type of infections. There was not significant statistical difference in: failure 31.8% group A, 30.2% group B (RR 1.05, CI 95% 0.66-1.66, p = 0.86), or adverse events (one in each group). The RRR was 1.5%, and ARR 2%, with a NNT of 67. Conclusion: Piperacillin/tazobactam without amikacin was as effective as combination therapy in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia.