Lee H. Herman’s research while affiliated with American Museum of Natural History and other places
What is this page?
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
Jerozenia comata Herman, new genus and new species, of the Oxytelinae, is described from The Democratic Republic of the Congo where it was collected from the raiding column of an unspecified species of ant. The genus is distinguished from all other Oxytelinae by the presence of only nine antennomeres and has been assigned to the Oxytelini. A brief summary of changes in the higher classification of the Oxytelinae since the last revision is included.
This catalog (published in seven parts, all released on the same day) is based on only the published literature for the Staphylinidae. Of the 32 subfamilies, the following 28 are included herein: Apateticinae, Dasycerinae, Empelinae, Euaesthetinae, Glypholomatinae, Habrocerinae, Leptotyphlinae, Megalopsidiinae, Micropeplinae, Microsilphinae, Neophoninae, Olisthaerinae, Omaliinae, Osoriinae, Oxyporinae, Oxytelinae, Phloeocharinae, Piestinae, Protactinae†, Proteininae, Protopselaphinae, Pseudopsinae, Solieriinae, Staphylininae, Steninae, Tachyporinae, Trichophyinae, and Trigonurinae. The Aleocharinae, Paederinae, Pselphinae, and Scaphidiinae are excluded from this edition of the catalog. References to the original citation or description are given for available family-group, genus-group, and species-group names of both extant and extinct forms. The type genus is cited for each family-group name, the type species for each genus-group name, and the type locality for each species-group name. Where appropriate, all subgenera, subspecies, or synonyms are listed for each valid name. Annotated subsequent references are presented for all names. Distributional summaries are given for each valid taxon. Full bibliographic citations are in Part VII. A short historical review, coauthored with Aleš Smetana, follows the Introduction (Part I), with the main focus on biographical sketches that include many photographs. The goal of this catalog is to summarize the current state of knowledge of the family and to stimulate worldwide monographic studies.
This catalog (published in seven parts, all released on the same day) is based on only the published literature for the Staphylinidae. Of the 32 subfamilies, the following 28 are included herein: Apateticinae, Dasycerinae, Empelinae, Euaesthetinae, Glypholomatinae, Habrocerinae, Leptotyphlinae, Megalopsidiinae, Micropeplinae, Microsilphinae, Neophoninae, Olisthaerinae, Omaliinae, Osoriinae, Oxyporinae, Oxytelinae, Phloeocharinae, Piestinae, Protactinae dagger, Proteininae, Protopselaphinae, Pseudopsinae, Solieriinae, Staphylininae, Steninae, Tachyporinae, Trichophyinae, and Trigonurinae. The Aleocharinae, Paederinae, Pselphinae, and Scaphidiinae are excluded from this edition of the catalog. References to the original citation or description are given for available family-group, genus-group, and species-group names of both extant and extinct forms. The type genus is cited for each family-group name, the type species for each genus-group name, and the type locality for each species-group name. Where appropriate, all subgenera, subspecies, or synonyms are listed for each valid name. Annotated subsequent references are presented for all names. Distributional summaries are given for each valid taxon. Full bibliographic citations are in Part VII. A short historical review, coauthored with Ales Smetana, follows the Introduction (Part I), with the main focus on biographical sketches that include many photographs. The goal of this catalog is to summarize the current state of knowledge of the family and to stimulate worldwide monographic studies.
This catalog (published in seven parts, all released on the same day) is based on only the published literature for the Staphylinidae. Of the 32 subfamilies, the following 28 are included herein: Apateticinae, Dasycerinae, Empelinae, Euaesthetinae, Glypholomatinae, Habrocerinae, Leptotyphlinae, Mega] opsidiinae, Micropeplinae, Microsilphinae, Neophoninae, Olisthaerinae, Omaliinae, Osoriinae, Oxyporinae, Oxytelinae, Phloeocharinae, Piestinae, Protactinae dagger, Proteininae, Protopselaphinae, Pseudopsinae, Solieriinae, Staphylininae, Steninae, Tachyporinae, Trichophyinae, and Trigonurinae. The Aleocharinae, Paederinae, Pselphinae, and Scaphidiinae are excluded from this edition of the catalog. References to the original citation or description are given for available family-group, genus-group, and species-group names of both extant and extinct forms. The type genus is cited for each family-group name, the type species for each genus-group name, and the type locality for each species-group name. Where appropriate, all subgenera, subspecies, or synonyms are listed for each valid name. Annotated subsequent references are presented for all names. Distributional summaries are given for each valid taxon. Full bibliographic citations are in Part VII. A short historical review, coauthored with Ales Smetana, follows the Introduction (Part I), with the main focus on biographical sketches that include many photographs. The goal of this catalog is to summarize the current state of knowledge of the family and to stimulate worldwide monographic studies.
This catalog (published in seven parts, all released on the same day) is based on only the published literature for the Staphylinidae. Of the 32 subfamilies, the following 28 are included herein: Apateticinae, Dasycerinae, Empelinae, Euaesthetinae, Glypholomatinae, Habrocerinae, Leptotyphlinae, Megalopsidiinae, Micropeplinae, Microsilphinae, Neophoninae, Olisthaerinae, Omaliinae, Osoriinae, Oxygorinae, Oxytelinae, Phloeocharinae, Piestinae, Protactinae dagger, Proteininae, Protopselaphinae, Pseudopsinae, Solieriinae, Staphylininae, Steninae, Tachyporinae, Trichophyinae, and Trigonurinae. The Aleocharinae, Paederinae, Pselphinae, and Scaghidiinae are excluded from this edition of the catalog. References to the original citation or description are given for available family-group, genus-group, and species-group names of both extant and extinct forms. The type genus is cited for each family-group name, the type species for each genus-group name, and the type locality for each species-group name. Where appropriate, all subgenera, subspecies, or synonyms are listed for each valid name. Annotated subsequent references are presented for all names. Distributional summaries are given for each valid taxon. Full bibliographic citations are in Part VII. A short historical review, coauthored with Ales Smetana, follows the Introduction (Part I), with the main focus on biographical sketches that include many photographs. The goal of this catalog is to summarize the current state of knowledge of the family and to stimulate worldwide monographic studies.
Citations (8)
... 14 15 www.aegaweb.com/arquivos_entomoloxicos Introdução Os Aleocharinae Fleming, 1821 são uma das maiores subfamílias da família Staphylinidae Latreille, 1802 com mais de 12 000 espécies distribuídas por 52 tribos (Herman, 2001), as quais são geralmente pequenas (2-5 mm de comprimento), predadoras de larvas e ovos de outros artrópodes, em especial Diptera, e encontram-se em todos os meios ecológicos, como em ninhos de formigas e térmitas, cogumelos, folhas mortas (Ashe, 2007;Ferreira, 2011Ferreira, , 2014. As larvas dos Aleocharini são conhecidas como ectoparasitas das pupas das moscas (Peschke & Fuldner, 1977;Maus et al., 1998) e, assim, são encontradas em habitats infestados por moscas, como excrementos, animais mortos, materiais orgânicos em decomposição e à beira das costas marinhas em algas em decomposição (Klimaszewski, 1984;Frank & Ahn, 2011). ...
... The 90 currently named species of Anotylus have a cosmopolitan distribution, but the greatest concentration of diversity occurs in the Neotropics [58,59]. The last catalogue of staphylinid biodiversity reported two species of Anotylus in Costa Rica [58], Anotylus insignitus Gravenhorst, 1806 which is an invasive species, and Anotylus nitescens Bernhauer, 1942 a species apparently endemic to Costa Rica (Vera Blanca [60]. The former possesses a large distribution throughout the Americas and several Atlantic and Pacific islands [57]; however, like many older species' descriptions, this taxon may be made up of several discreet species with smaller distributions [61]. A. nitescens has not appeared in the literature since its original species description [62]. ...
... Note. Tise species was described from northern India (Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand) and is know from Pakistan, India (Herman, 2001), and Nepal (Blinstein, 2023). Within India it was known from Uttar Pradesh (Biswas & Sengupta (1989). ...
... The list available from Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF Secretariat 2023) was used for mammals, while the Catalogue of Life Checklist (Version 2024-04-26) (Newton 2022) was used for Amblyopinina taxonomy. In rare instances, other sources were used to supplement the previously mentioned sources: Herman (2001) for Amblyopinina; Musser and Carleton (1993), National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025), Peçanha et al. (2020), Smith (2007), and Wilson et al. (2017) for mammals. ...
... This key is based on the species listed by Puthz (1966), their current valid names (Herman 2001;Puthz 2013), examination of recently collected material and the two new species described here. Remarks. ...
... The most abundant species of the family was Creophilus maxillosus (7 cases, 4.38% of cases). It represents an established indicator species with well-defined thermal summation models of development (Watson- (Herman 2001, Schülke and Smetana 2015, Mazur and Melke,2022. The species was collected across both indoor and outdoor cases during the spring and summer months, which agrees with the conclusions and observations of and Bonacci et al. (2021). ...
... SCHEERPELTZ in 1944 erected a new tribe, Trigonobregmini, and described the genus Trigonobregma, based on the species Thinobius ocularis FAUVEL, 1902. HERMAN (2001 listed the genus and species in Oxytelinae and in a further paper (HERMAN 2003) explained that it was overlooked at the time of his 1970 generic revision and he erroneously included T. ocularis in Thinobius. Upon examination of the single syntype specimen it is obvious that it is not a member of the Oxytelinae, because there are not seven visible abdominal sternites, not even a trace of a developed second sternite. ...
