Las Casas’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


ANT AND SPIDER INTERACTIONS IN COFFEE AGROECOSYSTEMS: PATTERNS AND MECHANISMS
  • Conference Paper

October 2015

·

23 Reads

El Colegio De La

·

Frontera Sur

·

San Cristóbal

·

[...]

·

México Carretera

Both abiotic and biotic factors affect the abundance and distribution of organisms and therefore impact ecosystems and agroecosystems. Indeed, some organisms have strong effects on the distribution of others because they act as keystone species and/or ecosystem engineers whose effects cascade to other trophic levels. Ants can affect the distribution and abundance of a variety of taxonomic groups. In coffee agroecosystems from Southern Mexico Azteca sericeasur ants actively patrol the tree where their nest is built and the nearby coffee plants influencing the ant community and biological control. Here we report the relationship that A.sericeasur has with spiders, an abundant predatory group found in coffee farms. We present evidence of the relationships between A. sericeasur and spider communities found at the coffee layer and at the tree trunk layer; and we suggest potential mechanisms driving the observed patterns. During the summers of 2008 and 2009 we sampled spiders in the coffee layer and we found that spiders per coffee bush were richer and more abundant in the presence of A. sericeasur that in its absence. Indeed, in the presence of these ants, spider richness increased by 27% whereas spider abundance increased by 67 %. Although, spider richness and abundance per coffee plant increased in the presence of A. sericeasur, spider species composition did not change between plants with and without the ants. In addition, we found that insect abundance per coffee plant increased in the presence of the ants. Based on this evidence we propose resource availability and enemy free space as driving mechanisms In regard to the spider community found at the trunk of shade trees in 2011 and 2012 we found that A. sericeasur was positively correlated with spider abundance and biomass. Indeed, spider abundance increased by 57.5% in the presence of the ants whereas spider biomass was also strongly correlated with their presence. However, we also identified that excluding the two most abundant spiders (Ischnothele digitata and Azilia guatemalensis), strongly changed the observed patterns. Fieldwork observations supported that both I. digitata and A. guatemalensis are predators of A. sericeasur. Likewise the coffee layer, spider species composition in the tree trunk layer was not strongly affected by the presence of the ant. Finally, we report the association between Falconina sp and A. sericeasur; a swift spider that travels in and out of A. sericeasur nests. Our data suggest that Falconina is a scavenger that takes advantage of dead A. sericeasur individuals. Overall we show that through resource availability, enemy free space and predation, A. sericeasur ants positively drive spider communities found at the coffee and at the tree trunk layers of coffee agroecosystems. (CONACYT, University of Michigan-Rackham School and School of Natural Resources and Environment, COCYTECH and NSF-DEB-1262086 granted to S. Philpott).


Benz et al. Supplement
  • Data
  • File available

July 2013

·

89 Reads

Download

Table 1 . Communities Sampled for Maize in Chamula and Oxchuc, Chiapas, 2000
Table 2 . Color Distribution of Tzotzil and Tzeltal Maize
Table 3 . Maize Names Recorded, Listed According to Relative Frequency in Chamula and Oxchuc, 2000
Table 4 . Quadratic Assignment (r) (Borgatti 1996a, b) and Multiple Response Permutation (d) Tests (Cade and Richards 2001) of Pile-Sort Aggregate Proximity and Individual Proximity Matrices Respectively Derived from Four Mayan Com- munities' Sorts of Maize Photos
Figure 6. Multidimensional scaling plot of second pile-sort matrices of two communities combined from each ethnolinguistic group, suggesting cultural differences in ability to distinguish maize from their own community. Left, Tzeltal (triangles); right, Tzotzil (circles).

+1

Tzeltal and Tzotzil Farmer Knowledge and Maize Diversity in Chiapas, Mexico

January 2007

·

72 Reads

·

1 Citation

XI 06 Different maize races dominate the highland communities of the Tzotzil and the Tzeltal of highland Chiapas, Mexico. When Tzeltal and Tzotzil informants from four communities were asked to sort photographs of maize varieties from the two municipalities according to ear similarity and the pictured variety's ability to produce on their communities' lands, their responses revealed that they have a common system of maize classification based on color and that unnamed but culturally specific categories discriminate maize types according to ethno-linguistic group. The significance of these findings is that while color, a perceptually distinct but nonadaptive trait, dominates maize classification by these farmers, intermediate but unlabeled categories help to explain the geographic dis-tribution of maize in the regional environment. Thus, ethno-linguistic diversity contributes to maize diversity. When we compare the individuals of the same variety . . . of our cultivated plants . . . , one of the first points which strikes us is, that they generally differ more from each other than do the individuals of any one species or variety in the state of nature. —C. Darwin, On the Origin of Species


Tzeltal and Tzotzil Farmer Knowledge and Maize Diversity in Chiapas, Mexico

January 2007

·

37 Reads

·

4 Citations

XI 06 Different maize races dominate the highland communities of the Tzotzil and the Tzeltal of highland Chiapas, Mexico. When Tzeltal and Tzotzil informants from four communities were asked to sort photographs of maize varieties from the two municipalities according to ear similarity and the pictured variety's ability to produce on their communities' lands, their responses revealed that they have a common system of maize classification based on color and that unnamed but culturally specific categories discriminate maize types according to ethno-linguistic group. The significance of these findings is that while color, a perceptually distinct but nonadaptive trait, dominates maize classification by these farmers, intermediate but unlabeled categories help to explain the geographic dis-tribution of maize in the regional environment. Thus, ethno-linguistic diversity contributes to maize diversity. When we compare the individuals of the same variety . . . of our cultivated plants . . . , one of the first points which strikes us is, that they generally differ more from each other than do the individuals of any one species or variety in the state of nature. —C. Darwin, On the Origin of Species