L M Eriksson’s research while affiliated with Uppsala University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


TABLE 1 . Description of the respondents and their households (n 102) Characteristic No. (%) 
TABLE 2 . Description of refrigerators (n 102) in the survey Characteristic No. (%) 
Home Storage Temperatures and Consumer Handling of Refrigerated Foods in Sweden
  • Article
  • Full-text available

December 2004

·

956 Reads

·

163 Citations

Journal of Food Protection

·

·

L M Eriksson

·

[...]

·

The lack of data on consumer refrigeration temperatures and storage times limits our ability to assess and manage risks associated with microbial hazards. This study addressed these limitations by collecting data on temperatures and storage handling practices of chilled foods. Consumers from 102 households in Uppsala, Sweden, were instructed to purchase seven food items (minced meat, fresh herring fillets, soft cheese, milk, sliced cooked ham, vacuum-packed smoked salmon, and ready-to-eat salad) and to store them using their normal practices. They were interviewed the next day, and food temperatures were measured. In general, there were no significant relations between temperature and characteristics of the respondents (e.g., sex, age, education, age of the refrigerator). Mean storage temperatures ranged from 6.2 degrees C for minced meat to 7.4 degrees C for ready-to-eat salad. Maximum temperatures ranged from 11.3 to 18.2 degrees C. Data were not significantly different from a normal distribution, except for ready-to-eat salad, although distributions other than the normal fitted data better in most cases. Five percent to 20% of the food items were stored at temperatures above 10 degrees C. Most respondents knew the recommended maximum temperature, but less than one fourth claimed to know the temperature in their own refrigerator. Practical considerations usually determined where food was stored. For products with a long shelf life, stated storage times were different for opened and unopened packages. The current situation might be improved if consumers could be persuaded to use a thermometer to keep track of refrigerator temperature.

Download

Citations (1)


... Approach B is a modification of Approach A, in which a generic distribution is used for the storage temperature instead of individual data. The storage temperature data in the data set provided point estimates of the households refrigerator temperatures, ignoring the fact that the temperature of food items in the refrigerator can fluctuate due to their placement within the refrigerator, season and load of use (Giarratana et al., 2022;Jofré et al., 2019;Marklinder et al., 2004), which may impact the microbial behavior. As the effect of temperature fluctuations on the prolongation of the bacterial lag phase or the reduction of the growth rate mainly occurs at low temperature values, and the largest percent of cases is associated with high temperature storage (Giarratana et al., 2022), this effect should however be limited. ...

Reference:

Quantitative microbiological risk assessment using individual data on food storage and consumption (Part 2): A comparison with traditional QMRA approaches
Home Storage Temperatures and Consumer Handling of Refrigerated Foods in Sweden

Journal of Food Protection