May 2020
·
56 Reads
Indian Journal of Medical Research
This article revises the evolution of the concept "informed consent" in medical and stomatological practice, insisting on the legislation that supports it: intergovernmental instruments, but also the Romanian law, including the deontological code of the dentist. The discussions carried out with the purpose of obtaining the patient's consent include the nature of the procedure and reasonable alternatives of the proposed intervention, the risks and benefits of the treatment, the cost of the interventions and, finally, the acceptance or refusal of the stomatological procedure by the patient. There are three major obstacles that prevent a good communication between the dentist and the patient: the differences of language, of culture and the alteration of communication between dentist and patient during treatment. On the other hand, the adequate quality of the information depends firstly on the rational standard of the dentist, but also on the rational standard of the patient. We insist on the attributes of the informed consent and, finally, we revise the misunderstandings and disagreements that may come up between the dentist and the patient, most of them due to the dentist's misinterpretation of some facts. It is necessary to increase the standard of the informed consent by post university training for the dentists, by increasing the patients' awareness regarding the necessity of a much more explicit consent, by accepting the educational role of the dentist.