Kyungim Kim’s research while affiliated with Korea University and other places

Objectives This study compared the ischemic cardiovascular events (iCVEs) effectiveness and safety of initiating empagliflozin or dapagliflozin with those of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), as well as the comparative effects between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin. Methods Using data from the National Health Insurance Service in Korea, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were newly prescribed empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or DPP-4is from 2016 to 2019 and who did not have a recent CVE history were included. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for iCVEs and safety events. Results Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin significantly reduced the risks of ischemic stroke (aHR 0.568, 95% CI 0.408–0.791; aHR 0.612, 95% CI 0.476–0.786, respectively) and all-cause mortality (aHR 0.590, 95% CI 0.442–0.788; aHR 0.730, 95% CI 0.603–0.884, respectively) compared with DPP-4is. Initiating dapagliflozin or empagliflozin was associated with significantly lower incidence of severe hypoglycemia, bone fracture, urinary tract infection, and acute kidney injury than that of DPP-4is. No significant differences were observed between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in iCVEs and most safety outcomes. Conclusion Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin showed significant preventive effects on ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality compared with DPP-4is in patients with T2DM, and their protective effects were similar. Both empagliflozin and dapagliflozin were not related to the harmful effects on most safety events. These results suggest that it may be beneficial to initiate empagliflozin or dapagliflozin for ischemic stroke prevention in patients with T2DM. However, further validation studies, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed to generalize these results.

Background Few studies have evaluated the comparative efficacy of biologics for asthma. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of biologics. Methods This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of a biologic compared to a placebo or another biologic in patients with inadequately controlled asthma despite high-intensity treatment, published by January 6, 2022. Two researchers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. The outcomes of interest were the annual asthma exacerbation rate (AER), forced expiratory volume per second before bronchodilator use (preBD FEV1), the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), and asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) results. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted, and a random effects model was used to draw pooled incidence rate ratio or standardized mean differences. Results Twenty-three RCTs with 8376 participants were retrieved. All biologics included in this study were associated with significantly better effects than placebo in AER, preBD FEV1, and ACQ outcomes. Although there were no significant differences between the biologics in the overall study population, patients with eosinophil levels ≥300 cells/μL or eosinophilic asthma showed that dupilumab and tezepelumab were significantly better than anti-IL-5 biologics in improving preBD FEV1. Additionally, in patients with eosinophil levels ≥300 cells/μL, benralizumab, unlike reslizumab, performed significantly better than placebo in improving ACQ and AQLQ outcomes. Conclusion The comparative effects of biologics can be considered with phenotypes and biomarkers to help clinicians select an appropriate treatment for inadequately controlled asthma.

Background In studies with small sample sizes, the use of nonparametric methods is generally recommended for statistical analysis. However, various studies continue to employ parametric analysis without verifying the assumption of a normal distribution. Objectives To assess the current utilization of parametric and nonparametric methods for primary outcomes, as well as the reporting of normality assumptions, in phase 3 clinical trials with small sample sizes. Methods All phase 3 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov until September 12, 2023, were collected. After undergoing a two-step selection process, only publications with a sample size per group of less than 30, involving two or more groups, and specifying the statistical methods used to compare the means or medians of primary outcomes between groups were selected. Statistical methods were categorized as nonparametric, parametric, and either parametric or nonparametric. The reporting of normality assumptions was also evaluated. Results A total of 317 studies were assessed in this study. Among these studies, 164 (51.7%) studies conducted parametric analysis, and 111 (35.0%) studies employed nonparametric analysis; however, 42 (13.2%) studies conducted parametric or nonparametric analysis without specifying which method was used. In addition, 63.1% of the total studies did not report normality assumptions. Specifically, within the subset of studies with parametric analysis, 70.1% of studies did not report normality assumptions. Conclusions This research demonstrated that most studies with small sample sizes employed parametric analysis without reporting normality assumptions. The findings emphasize the need for increased awareness of and compliance with statistical principles in the analysis of phase 3 clinical trials with limited sample sizes.

Background: Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often experience cutaneous adverse events, such as rashes and pruritus. In this study, we aimed to compare the risks of cutaneous adverse events between imatinib- and second-generation TKI-treated patients with CML. Material and methods: Paired reviewers independently obtained studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library published until 15 March 2022. The following terms were searched: (Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic and BCR-ABL Positive), chronic myeloid leukemia, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TKI, imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and radotinib. Two independent reviewers screened the results and selected articles on cutaneous adverse events. RevMan 5.4 and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to perform the meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Results and conclusion: Eleven trials involving 4502 patients were analyzed in this study. Patients treated with second-generation TKIs were significantly more likely to experience cutaneous adverse events than those treated with imatinib with a relative risk (RR) of 1.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], [1.25-2.09]). Except dasatinib (RR [95% CI], 1.39 [0.75-2.56]), the risk of adverse events was more with second-generation TKIs than with imatinib as follows: nilotinib (2.11 [1.53-2.90]), bosutinib (1.41 [1.07-1.86]), and radotinib (1.87 [1.33-2.63]). Rash was the most common cutaneous adverse event that was observed in 21.6% of cases across all grades, followed by pruritus (5.7%) and alopecia (4.3%). In conclusion, our findings suggest that cutaneous adverse events occur more frequently with second-generation TKIs than with imatinib. Therefore, effective management of the cutaneous outcome is necessary to achieve high patient adherence to medication and successful treatment with TKIs.

Background An effective test mechanism to evaluate clinical knowledge and skills of the entry-level healthcare professionals is important for providing clinical competency and improving patient care. This study aimed to develop novel, innovative computer-based test (Inno-CBT) item types for application in the national examination of Korean healthcare professionals. Methods This exploratory study was conducted from May 2021 to March 2022 by a team of faculty members from pharmacy schools in South Korea. A literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, RISS, Web of Science, and KoreaMed was performed. Forum presentations, media articles, and previous reports by the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute (KHPLEI) were included. Workshops were held, information and ideas were collected and conceptualized, and item types were designed, drafted, and refined. By repeating this process, the Inno-CBT item types were finalized. Results Forty-one Inno-CBT item types with 28 subtypes were developed. New digital technologies, such as a reactive responsive media interface, an animation insertion, multimedia embedding, and network surfing, were utilized in these novel types. It was anticipated that these Inno-CBT item types would effectively measure abilities in healthcare knowledge, problem-solving skills, and professional behaviors. Some potential barriers to implementing the Inno-CBT item types include item difficulty, operational unfamiliarity, complexity in scoring protocols, and network security. Conclusions A variety of styles of novel Inno-CBT item types were developed to evaluate the multifaceted and in-depth professional abilities required for healthcare professionals. Prior to implementing these item types in the national examination, item validation and technical support should be conducted.

Purpose of Review To investigate the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and explore the factors influencing these effects. Recent Findings FMD was significantly higher in the omega-3 fatty acid group compared to the control group (mean difference = 0.90%; p = 0.0003). In particular, the subgroup with CHD (both EPA + DHA < 1 g/day and ≥ 1 g/day) and the subgroup without CHD but with CHD risk factors (only EPA + DHA ≥ 1 g/day) showed significantly increased FMD after supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids. CIMT was not significantly different between the omega-3 fatty acid and control groups (standardized mean difference = -0.08; p = 0.26). Subgroup analysis of CHD patients was not conducted because of the limited number of studies. Summary Intake of omega-3 fatty acids improved FMD in patients with CHD and patients with risk factors for CHD. Further research is needed on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on CIMT.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in adults newly diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: This propensity score-matching cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) 2.0 database in South Korea from 2002 to 2015. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, for the new onset of T2D (ICD-10 code, E11) in AD patients compared to the matched controls. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Results: Each of the 36,692 individuals in the AD group and matched control group was included in the analysis. The risk of T2D in the AD group was significantly higher than that of the matched controls in the adjusted model (adjusted HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.27-1.63, P < .001). The results of subgroup analysis by sex, age, and body mass index were consistent with the results of the primary analysis. Sensitivity analyses using different T2D and/or AD definitions also showed consistent results. Conclusions: The significant risk of subsequent T2D in adult AD patients suggested the necessity for efforts to prevent T2D in AD patients.