Kristjan Jespersen’s research while affiliated with Copenhagen Business School and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


The Institutional Work of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Why the Mundane Should Matter
  • Article

December 2017

·

157 Reads

·

38 Citations

Ecological Economics

Kristjan Jespersen

·

While the literature on ecological economics often notes the importance of institutions, there has been less attention to the ways in which these institutions are created in practice. We contribute to the literature on institutions in ecological economics by examining the practice of institutional creation in the context of the literature on Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES). While a large literature outlines ideal PES models, PES literature tends to overlook the demanding everyday work involved in building and maintaining the institutions upon which successful PES models depend. Drawing on the theory of institutional work, we conduct an extensive survey of the literature on PES to find examples of everyday work undertaken to build and maintain PES institutions, or else to disrupt institutions that stand in the way. Finding very limited discussion of the work of institutional creation, we present a case study of efforts to develop Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, identifying numerous examples of institutional work essential to the initiative. We suggest that institutional work, with its highly developed typologies of actions involved in institutional creation, can be a helpful tool for critical institutionalist studies of ecological economics.

Citations (1)


... One of the conclusions of the available literature is that the ES framework is not a silver-bullet tool to solve socio-environmental governance dilemmas (Zolyomi et al., 2023). A key aspect influencing the effectiveness of governance structures and mechanisms is the capacity of local institutions to innovate and adapt to changing local socio-ecological situations (Jespersen and Gallemore, 2018), and participation can help to enhance such institutional capacity to adapt and innovate (Primmer and Furman, 2024). Employing a participatory approach that involves stakeholders throughout the entire process of policy design can strengthen local institutions through legitimacy and different forms of justice (Haque and Sharifi, 2024;Suwandhahannadi et al., 2024). ...

Reference:

Ecosystem services and collective action: New commons, new governance challenges
The Institutional Work of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Why the Mundane Should Matter
  • Citing Article
  • December 2017

Ecological Economics