Kris Aerts’s research while affiliated with KU Leuven and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (22)


Profit sharing and innovation
  • Article

January 2015

·

57 Reads

·

17 Citations

Industrial and Corporate Change

K. Aerts

·

·

J. Lang

We investigate the effect of profit sharing on product and process innovation. Profit sharing is a credible commitment on the part of companies to allow their employees to participate in any efficiency gain. Resistance to technical progress becomes less plausible. Moreover, employees are motivated to share their specific information advantage on possibilities to optimize the production process and products with the management. We take account of possible selectivity effects and, using survey data on German companies with and without profit sharing, we test our hypothesis by comparing measures of innovativeness. We apply matching and conditional difference-in-differences and find that the introduction of profit sharing spurs product innovation but has no effect on process innovation.




Two for the Price of One? Additionality Effects of R&D Subsidies: A Comparison between Flanders and Germany

June 2008

·

145 Reads

·

337 Citations

SSRN Electronic Journal

We empirically test whether public R&D subsidies crowd out private R&D investment in Flanders and Germany, using firm level data from the Flemish and German part of the Community Innovation Surveys (CIS III and IV). Both the non-parametric matching estimator and the conditional difference-in-differences estimator with repeated cross-sections (CDiDRCS) clearly indicate that the crowding-out hypothesis can be rejected: funded firms are significantly more R&D active than non-funded firms. In the domain of additionality effects of R&D subsidies, this paper is the first to apply the CDiDRCS method.


Additionality effects of public R&D funding: ‘R’ versus ‘D’

January 2008

·

38 Reads

·

16 Citations

Several studies have already addressed the question whether R&D subsidies lead to additionality effects or crowd out firms’ private investment. This paper provides insights into the impact of R&D grants on private R&D expenditure, distinguishing between research and development activities. We employ parametric treatment effects models and IV regression methods. The hypothesis that firms respond differently to R&D subsidies depending on the nature of the R&D activity is confirmed. R&D subsidies are found to mainly contribute to an increase in development expenditure. By contrast, crowding out effects for the research part cannot be rejected.



Profit sharing and innovation

January 2008

·

91 Reads

·

4 Citations

SSRN Electronic Journal

We investigate the effect of profit sharing on product and process innovation. Profit sharing is a credible commitment on the part of companies to allow their employees to participate in any efficiency gain. Resistance to technical progress becomes less plausible. Moreover, employees are motivated to share their specific information advantage on possibilities to optimize the production process and products with the management. We take account of possible selectivity effects and, using survey data on German companies with and without profit sharing, we test our hypothesis by comparing measures of innovativeness. We apply matching and conditional difference-in-differences and find that the introduction of profit sharing spurs product innovation but has no effect on process innovation.


Who writes the pay slip? Do R&D subsidies merely increase researcher wages?

January 2008

·

97 Reads

·

14 Citations

Government intervention in private R&D activity is common practice nowadays. However, its impact may not be unambiguously positive. First, companies may simply replace private R&D budgets with the public R&D grant. Second, even if an increase in private R&D investment is confirmed, it may not automatically induce more R&D output: the additional R&D budget may be crowded out by duplicate or more risky research, or a mere increase in researcher wages. This paper empirically analyzes the effect of public R&D subsidies on private R&D investments, employment and wages in Flanders, using a parametric treatment effects models on the funding status as well as IV regression models on the amount of funding. Positive additionality effects are supported, measured in terms of R&D expenditure, employment and wages. However, partial crowding out cannot be rejected.


Screening door Europese incubators: hoe 'balanced' is hun 'scorecard'?

December 2007

·

6 Reads

Business incubators begeleiden startende ondernemingen in hun groeiproces en vormen zo een instrument ter bevordering van innovatie en nieuw ondernemerschap. In dit artikel wordt onderzocht of incubators bepaalde screening-criteria hanteren om hun potentiële huurders te evalueren. Dit werd vroeger al onderzocht voor Amerikaanse incubators in 1988. De replicatie van dit onderzoek in Europa, anno 2003 geeft aan dat er drie soorten Europese incubators zijn: een groep die niet screent, een groep die screent op (de inschatting van) de kwaliteit van het team en ten slotte een groep die screent op het product en zijn potentieel.



Citations (15)


... While many authors are supportive of the idea that the underlying boost for companies must be specialized, very few however insists on an evaluation of the intrinsic quality of the support framework, which would ensure the possibility of shifting from a policy focused on quantity to an approach based on quality (Frugier, 2014). This is particularly the case with Aerts et al. (2007) who reveal that the performance of an incubator depends on the success of its incubators. The work that has emerged there mainly derives from that of Gasse and Tremblay (2007) which indicates that the purpose of support is to provide a means to accessing financial capital, human capital, and social capital; Nkakleu and Fouda Ongodo (2009) who examine the influence of support structures on management practices; Nkakleu et al. (2010), analyzing the role of support structures in the acquisition and development of the skills of entrepreneurs and managers of small businesses; Kamdem et al. (2011), who identify the forms and practices of entrepreneurial support likely to have an impact on the performance of very small businesses; Nkakleu et al. (2013), who are interested in the impact of support structures on the skills and performance of SMEs start-up; and Pouka (2018) and Pouka and Nomo (2017) who study the impacts of subcontracting and partnership stock exchange programs on the performance of SMEs in the industrial sector. ...

Reference:

A Synthetic Indicator of the Quality of Support for Businesses in Burkina-Faso, Cameroon, and Ghana
Critical Role and Screening Practices of European Business Incubators
  • Citing Article
  • January 2005

SSRN Electronic Journal

... Most of the studies described in the previous section analyze the impact of public aid, taking into account both endogeneity and selection problems. David, Hall and Toole (2000), Klette, Moen and Griliches (2000) and, more recently, Aerts, Czarnitzki and Fier (2007) review the main empirical papers about the impact of public subsidies on firms' R&D expenditures, paying special attention to the different methodologies applied to avoid these estimation prob-lems. 5 Among the most usual alternatives, we find Heckman's (1979) selection model, which we will follow in this paper. ...

Evaluación econométrica de las políticas públicas de I + D: situación actual
  • Citing Article
  • January 2007

... When employees perceive that the organisation recognises their efforts by sharing profits, they respond by putting in more effort and are encouraged to make suggestions and experiment with new ways of doing their jobs (Jiang et al., 2012). According to Aerts et al. (2015): '… employees are closely involved in the company's bench-level expertise and may therefore possess an information advantage on potential weaknesses and inefficiencies […] Without profit sharing, there is hardly any incentive to disclose this information to the management' (p. 1379). ...

Profit sharing and innovation
  • Citing Article
  • January 2015

Industrial and Corporate Change

... Innovation can drive economic growth and help firms obtain competitive advantages (Yuan and Wen 2018;Zhou and Wu 2010). Governments in most countries have taken various innovation policy instruments (Aerts, Czarnitzki, and Fier 2006;Aschhoff and Sofka 2009), such as government regulation and procurement, low-interest loans, R&D subsidy, and tax credit, to stimulate corporate innovation. R&D subsidy is a widely used direct financial support to risky but socially valuable corporate R&D projects (Dimos and Pugh 2016;Dumont 2017;Zúñiga-Vicente et al. 2014). ...

Econometric evaluation of public R&D policies: current state of the art – Work in Progress –
  • Citing Article
  • Full-text available

... While evaluation studies have focused on the effects of direct public support on research and development expenditure (Aerts & Czarnitzki, 2006;Almus & Czarnitzki, 2003;Czarnitzki, 2001;Czarnitzki & Fier, 2002;Duguet, 2012), recent studies have looked at other important changes in the behavior and output of firms by incentives. Czarnitzki and Fier (2002) found that firms that received R&D subsidies invest more in innovation and R&D. ...

The Impact of Public R&D - Funding in Flanders
  • Citing Article
  • January 2006

... A detailed survey description can be found inCzarnitzki (2006). 5 New products are defined in concordance with the guidelines in the OSLO-Manual (OECD/Eurostat, 2005). ...

Research, development and innovation in Flanders 2004
Kris Aerts

·

Bruno Cassiman

·

Dirk Czarnitzki

·

[...]

·

... Some scholars hold the 'inhibiting effect view' and believe that subsidies may crowd out firm-financed R&D spending (Wallsten, 2000). The majority of studies that discuss the crowd-out effect of R&D subsidies in Belgium, Germany, and Spain, summarised by Aerts and Czarnitzki (2005). In China, there are information asymmetry and principal-agent problems between government and enterprises, which led to the fact that the government do not use scientific and reasonable standards to identify which enterprises should receive subsidies before subsidising innovation . ...

Using Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy: The Case of Flanders
  • Citing Article
  • January 2005

... These effects may have important implications, both from a methodological and a policy perspective. Studies in which the impact of public support on the total number of R&D employees is estimated (see for example, the firm-level studies by Wallsten 2000; Suetens 2002; Aerts 2008 or the estimations for a panel of OECD countries by Wolff and Reinthaler 2008; Thomson and Jensen 2011) may net out opposing effects. If one category of R&D employees is substituted for another, these studies could fail to find any statistically significant impact on R&D employees or conceal substantial shifts in its composition. ...

Who writes the pay slip? Do R&D subsidies merely increase researcher wages?
  • Citing Article
  • January 2008

... Efforts made by the organization towards offering quality work-life measurement of workers, help in the efficient and effective allocation of resources to enhance productivity and stability of the workforce, not necessarily meeting the needs of the workers, per se. Just as (Kris, Kornelius & Julia, 2013) asserted that to the best of their knowledge, no studies exist on the impact of Profit Sharing on the innovative performance of companies, the researcher of this study dares strongly assert here that, there is no literature, hitherto, contextually talk on the Profit Sharing as it relates to directly meeting Worker Needs. ...

Profit sharing and innovation
  • Citing Article
  • January 2008

SSRN Electronic Journal

... Previous analyses (e.g. Aerts, 2008;Görg & Strobl, 2007;Liu et al., 2016) have provided some insights. However, the majority of earlier studies have been partial in nature, relying mainly on small, cross-sectional datasets, with limited information on R&D support instruments, and firms' R&D and performance outcomes. ...

R&D subsidies and foreign ownership: Carrying Flemish coals to Newcastle
  • Citing Article