Kling J Kraus’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1 Caption: Mean ranking results from professional development needs survey from dual Mayo Clinic sites, 2019, comparing Males (N = 31) vs. Females (N = 31) and Physicians (N = 71) vs. Students (N = 62). * = KruskallWallis p-value < 0.05
Figure 2: Mean Rankings for Professional Development Events of Males vs. Females, Physicians vs. Students
Summary of survey student, faculty demographics at dual Mayo Clinic Sites, 2019
Results of completed professional needs survey at dual Mayo Clinic sites, by student sex and overall rank, 2019
Results of completed professional events survey at dual Mayo Clinic sites, by student sex and overall rank, 2019
Understanding the Sex-Based Professional Development Priorities of Medical Students: Results from a novel self-assessment survey tool
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 2020

·

85 Reads

MedEdPublish

Kling J Kraus

·

Kosiorek H Lim

·

·

[...]

·

Introduction: A novel survey tool was created in order to compare the professional development priorities of medical students by sex and year in training and to medical school faculty. Method: An electronic survey was developed and emailed to all first and second year medical students and medical school faculty across two campuses. Students ranked seven professional development needs and eight career development events in order of priority. Faculty ranked items based on what they thought would be priorities for medical students. Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric tests were used for all comparisons. Results: 65/200 (33%) students and 78/224 (35%) faculty responded. All students ranked future career planning as highest priority and financial planning as lowest priority. Students were most likely to attend career development events and least likely to attend social events. Males ranked networking (p<0.01) higher than females. Male and female faculty rankings and faculty vs. student rankings were not entirely consistent. Discussion: A novel survey tool was created which is easy to implement and analyze. Results imply sex-based differences in professional development priorities in early medical training. This survey tool can be used to address disparities in female student professional development and provide a more tailored experience for all medical students.

Download