Kjell Wahlström’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Territory defence in male European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)—a sexual ornament?
  • Article

July 2012

·

89 Reads

·

2 Citations

ACTA THERIOLOGICA

Kjell Wahlström

The function of male territoriality in roe deer has been debated for decades. There now seems to be consensus that it is a mating tactic. As such, it is highly untypical though. The reasons being, first, males neither conform to the typical ‘resource defence’ territoriality model nor to the ‘mate defence’ territoriality model; second, territory defence commences several months in advance of the breeding season; and third, the territorial system seems to be very rigid, as practically all studies that have described the social organisation of the species have reported adult males to be territorial. In spite of the general agreement that territoriality is a mating tactic, conclusive evidence on which selective forces are responsible for the prevalent pattern is still lacking. In the present paper, it is suggested that territorial defence serves as a sexual ornament, i.e. ‘cleanness’ of other males on the territory, in combination with size of the ‘clean’ area, and tenure length are parameters used by females to estimate male phenotypic quality. The hypothesis generates at least four predictions, and available data provide support. It is concluded that although a firm test of the hypothesis remains to be undertaken, existing data support this, just as well as any other, explanatory model and therefore it should be taken into consideration.

Citations (1)


... Male roe deer are territorial only during the summer when the rut takes place, but a given male may run the risk of losing his territory the following year if he migrates to a winter range, as site occupancy is likely a strong determinant of success in territorial defense (Linnell andAndersen 1998, Hoem et al. 2007). Hence, facultative migratory individuals may attempt to overwinter on their summer ranges in order to gain an earlier start on territorial establishment the following year (Wahlström 2013). Furthermore, roe deer males may not need to synchronize autumn migration with females because their mating season is already concluded. ...

Reference:

Large herbivore migration plasticity along environmental gradients in Europe: life‐history traits modulate forage effects
Territory defence in male European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)—a sexual ornament?
  • Citing Article
  • July 2012

ACTA THERIOLOGICA