Kiwamu Sakaguchi’s research while affiliated with Hokkaido University and other places

Background: In recent years, implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) have been used clinically. However, the extent to which additional implants reduce the burden of supporting tissues is unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of implanted IARPDs on stress sharing among supporting tissues, using finite element (FE) analysis. Methods: FE models were constructed based on the computed tomography (CT) of a patient with a unilateral defect of the mandibular premolars and molars and the surface data of an RPD with cuspids as abutments, designed using computer-aided design software. A titanium implant was placed in the area equivalent to the first premolar, second premolar, or first molar (IARPD4, IARPD5, and IARPD6, respectively). FE analysis was performed for laterally symmetrical models, i.e., bilateral distal free-end IARPDs. A vertical load of 200 N was applied to the central fossa of the artificial premolars or molars (L4, L5, or L6). Results: Equivalent stress in the alveolar mucosa and vertical displacement of the denture was smaller, with IARPDs under L5 and L6 loads, compared to RPDs. However, abutment teeth were displaced upward under an L6 load in the IARPD5 model. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the area corresponding to the first molar was recommended as the location for an implant under the denture base of bilateral distal free-end IARPDs. Implants located in the area corresponding to the second premolar may apply non-physiological extrusion force on abutment teeth under the load on the artificial second molar.

Purpose: To verify the effect of sitting posture with and without sole-ground contact on chewing stability and masticatory performance. Methods: Thirty healthy subjects were evaluated. The Conformat was used to analyze the center of sitting pressure (COSP), and the three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to analyze changes in head and trunk postures while subjects remained in a sitting position with and without sole-ground contact. The parameters of masticatory performance and movement were calculated as follows. For evaluating masticatory performance, the amount of glucose extraction (AGE) during chewing of a gummy jelly was measured. For evaluating masticatory movements, the movement of the mandibular incisal point was recorded using the Motion Visi-Trainer V1, and parameters of the stabilities of movement path and rhythm were calculated. Results: Head and trunk sway values and the displacement of COSP were significantly smaller with sole-ground contact than those without soleground contact. The masticatory movement path with sole-ground contact showed less variation in the opening distance and more stable movement path compared to those without sole-ground contact. The AGE was significantly greater with sole-ground contact than that without sole-ground contact. Conclusion: Sitting posture with and without sole-ground contact affects chewing stability and masticatory performance.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis in healthy subjects that masticatory movements affect head and trunk sways, and sitting and foot pressure distributions during sitting position. Methods: A total of 30 healthy male subjects with an average age of 25.3 years (range, 22-32 years) were evaluated. The CONFORMatTM and MatScanTM system were used to analyze changes in sitting pressure distribution (center of sitting pressure: COSP) and changes in foot pressure distribution (center of foot pressure: COFP) respectively, and the 3-dimensional motion analysis system was used to analyze changes in head and trunk postures while subjects remained sitting position with rest position, centric occlusion, and chewing. The total trajectory length of COSP/COFP, COSP/COFP area, and head and trunk sway values were compared between the three conditions to evaluate whether masticatory movement affected the stability of head and trunk sways, and sitting and foot pressure distributions. Results: Total trajectory length of COSP and COSP area during chewing were significantly shorter and smaller respectively than it was in rest position and centric occlusion (p < 0.016). Head sway value during chewing was significantly larger than it was in rest position and centric occlusion (p < 0.016). Conclusion: Masticatory movements affect sitting pressure distribution and head movements during sitting position.

Objective To evaluate the effect of body posture on occlusal contact. Methods A total of 30 healthy subjects were evaluated. T-Scan™ III was used to analyze the center of occlusal force (COF) and occlusal force distribution while subjects remained supine (SP), upright sitting with the head fixed (UP-HFI), upright sitting with the head free (UP-HFR), and natural standing (NS). Results The total trajectory length of COF was significantly longer in NS than in SP, UP-HFI, and UP-HFR. The COF area was significantly larger in UP-HFR than in SP and UP-HFI and also significantly larger in NS than in SP, UP-HFI, and UP-HFR. The anteroposterior occlusal force distribution (AOD) in NS shifted significantly forward, compared to SP, UP-HFI, and UP-HFR. AOD in UP-HFI and UP-HFR shifted significantly forward, compared to the SP position. Conclusion Changes in body posture affect the stability and anteroposterior balance of occlusal contacts.

Introduction Mastication involves complex tongue movements, coordination of lip, and cheek movements and is associated with head movement to facilitate the intraoral transport of food from ingesting to swallowing; it affects many functions of the whole body. However, studies to evaluate the relationship between masticatory movements and the body posture are still lacking to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of masticatory movements on the head, trunk, and body sway during the standing position. Methodology A total of 30 healthy subjects were evaluated. The MatScanTM system was used to analyze changes in body posture (center of foot pressure: COP) and the 3-dimensional motion analysis system was used to analyze changes in the head and trunk postures while subjects remained in the standing position with the rest position, centric occlusion, and masticating chewing gum. Results The total trajectory length of COP and head and trunk sways during masticating chewing gum were significantly shorter and smaller respectively than it was in the rest position and centric occlusion (p<0.016). COP area during masticating chewing gum was significantly smaller than it was in the 2 mandibular positions (p<0.016). Conclusion Masticatory movements positively affect the stability of the head, trunk, and body sways and enhance the postural stability during the standing position.