Kevin R. Murphy’s research while affiliated with Boys Town and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (93)


Evaluation of a disease-state education program in asthma: Application of the Knowledge-to-Action Framework
  • Article

January 2025

Allergy and Asthma Proceedings

Nazrin Yusufova

·

Ileen A. Gilbert

·

Frank Trudo

·

[...]

·

Kevin R. Murphy

Background: In patients with asthma, bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation both contribute to airway narrowing and airflow limitations, which lead to symptoms and exacerbations. Short-acting beta 2-agonist (SABA)-only rescue therapy addresses only bronchoconstriction and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Current asthma management guidelines recommend concomitant treatment of symptoms and inflammation with a fast-acting bronchodilator and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as rescue therapy for patients 12 years of age. However, there is an education and outreach gap for the wider adoption of anti-inflammatory rescue therapy in clinical practice.Objective: AstraZeneca has developed an education program for health-care practitioners (HCPs) based on a Knowledge-to-Action Framework, with the aim of increasing HCPs’ understanding of key disease-state concepts related to evidence-basedmanagement of asthma.Methods: A multichannel, evidence-based education program was presented at medical conferences across the United States between December 2022 and December 2023. Before and after each event, attendees were asked to complete a survey that rated their agreement with six disease-state concepts on a five-point Likert scale. These concepts related to the role of airway inflammation, fluctuations in inflammation, SABA and ICS therapy, and the risk of exacerbations.Postevent responses to the survey were assessed relative to pre-event responses and longitudinally over 12 months by using calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Acceptance and/or understanding of a concept was defined as a rating of “agree” or “strongly agree” from at least 80% of respondents.Results: The proportion of respondents who agreed or strongly agreed with each concept was significantly higher postevent versus pre-event (p < 0.001). The 80% acceptance and/or understanding threshold was surpassed for all concepts after the event.Conclusion: The medical education program improved understanding and/or acceptance of key disease-state concepts related to asthma management among participating HCPs. Effective communication of disease management concepts may lead to improved patient health outcomes through more rapid acceptance of guideline-recommended medical therapies.





Patient control category distributions relative to AIRQ cross-sectional validation standards. a48% of patients who shifted to well-controlled went on to have ≥ 1 subsequent-year exacerbation. The change in asthma control status as noted by validation standard (ACT+ exacerbations vs ACT Alone). The shift in control groups is reflected from left to right in the figure. N = 437 for patients with baseline AIRQ and ACT, whereas n = 428 for patients with 1-year follow-up data.
Impact of Utilizing a Composite versus a Symptom-Only Validation Standard in the Development of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2024

·

26 Reads

Download





Reduction in severe asthma exacerbation rates during the VOYAGE Week 12 to 52 treatment period in children with moderate-to-severe asthma who did or did not achieve 5% and 10% improvements in pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1 from baseline by Week 12.
Change of pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1 over time in children with moderate-to-severe asthma who did or did not achieve 5% and 10% improvements in pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1 from baseline by Week 12.
Impact of Lung Function on Asthma Exacerbation Rates in Children Treated with Dupilumab: The VOYAGE Study

February 2024

·

32 Reads

·

1 Citation

Background Severe, uncontrolled asthma and asthma exacerbations in children are associated with abnormal lung function and airway development, and increased risk of chronic obstructive lung disease in adulthood. The rationale for this post hoc analysis was to explore the relationship between changes in asthma exacerbation rates and lung function in children treated with dupilumab. Methods This post hoc analysis included children aged 6 to 11 years with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma (blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥20 ppb) who received dupilumab or placebo in the phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA VOYAGE study (NCT02948959). Endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements (≥5% or ≥10%) in pre-bronchodilator percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) by Week 12, annualized severe asthma exacerbation rates from Week 12–52, and mean change from baseline in ppFEV1 to Week 12. Results At Week 12 of VOYAGE, 141/236 (60%) of children treated with dupilumab and 57/114 (50%) of children receiving placebo showed improvements of ≥5% in ppFEV1; 106/236 (45%) children receiving dupilumab and 36/114 (32%) receiving placebo achieved improvements in ppFEV1 ≥10%. During the Week 12–52 treatment period, dupilumab vs placebo significantly reduced severe exacerbation rates in all subgroups by 52–60% (all P<0.05). Dupilumab treatment resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ppFEV1 (Week 12 least squares mean difference [95% CI] vs placebo: 3.54 [0.30, 6.78] percentage points; P=0.03) in children who achieved improvements of ≥5%. Conclusion Dupilumab vs placebo significantly improved pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1, with a higher proportion of patients achieving a clinically meaningful response at Week 12. Dupilumab also significantly reduced severe exacerbation rates, independent of pre-bronchodilator ppFEV1 response at Week 12. Trial Registration NCT02948959.


Citations (52)


... 21 AIRQ control level has been shown to be highly predictive of exacerbation risk over 12 months and probability of time-to-first exacerbation. 22,25,26 Participants are also required to have access to a smartphone and an internet connection. Other key inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1. ...

Reference:

A Fully Decentralized Randomized Controlled Study of As-Needed Albuterol–Budesonide Fixed-Dose Inhaler in Mild Asthma: The BATURA Study Design
Impact of Clinical Characteristics and Biomarkers on AIRQ Exacerbation Prediction Ability
  • Citing Article
  • May 2024

... 21 AIRQ control level has been shown to be highly predictive of exacerbation risk over 12 months and probability of time-to-first exacerbation. 22,25,26 Participants are also required to have access to a smartphone and an internet connection. Other key inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1. ...

Advancing assessment of asthma control with a composite tool: The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire
  • Citing Article
  • March 2024

Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology

... The most common adverse event that occurred was viral infection of the upper respiratory tract. Moreover, dupilumab significantly reduced FeNO levels compared to placebo (p < 0.001), too [23][24][25]. ...

Impact of Lung Function on Asthma Exacerbation Rates in Children Treated with Dupilumab: The VOYAGE Study

... Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that has effects on monoamine transporters and opioid receptors. It is a phencyclidine derivative that is made up of two isomers metabolized through first pass by liver isozymes [20,21]. Its metabolites norketamine and dehydronorketamine have a rapid onset and a short duration of action, making it suitable for the treatment of medical emergencies such as status asthmaticus [20]. ...

The Use of Albuterol/Budesonide as Reliever Therapy to Reduce Asthma Exacerbations
  • Citing Article
  • February 2024

... 5 Moreover, AIRQ is less likely than the ACT to overestimate current control and categorize patients with prior-and subsequent-year exacerbations as well-controlled (WC). 6 The cross-sectional validation standard for AIRQ differed from that used for the ACT, 7 in which the impairment questions and cut points of control were determined by specialist ratings of control, as outlined in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines (2002). The objective of the current analysis was to investigate how the AIRQ validation standard of ACT plus prior-year exacerbations supported the validity of the AIRQ as a measure of both current disease control and future exacerbation risk. ...

The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire Enhances the Assessment of Asthma Control
  • Citing Article
  • April 2023

Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology

... The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) is a 10-item yes/no composite asthma control tool. It was designed to assess symptoms over the past two weeks and exacerbations over the past 12 months [10][11][12]. It also predicts exacerbations in the coming 12 months and the probability of time to first exacerbation [13]. ...

Relationship Between Asthma Control as Measured by the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) and Patient Perception of Disease Status, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Treatment Adherence

... As was recently discussed by Sampson et al, 34 identifying the most suitable patients for omalizumab treatment is an important point to consider, as it will assist allergists in the clinic. Factors contributing to the identification of suitable patients may include presence of comorbid asthma (which may also be treated with omalizumab 22,35 ), patient preference for nonoral therapies, 35 and patient preference for selfadministration (which many allergists would recommend and is available for omalizumab, with many benefits for appropriate patients 36 ). ...

Identifying Patients for Self-Administration of Omalizumab

Advances in Therapy

... The primary goals of asthma management are symptom relief, prevention of acute asthmatic attacks, and improvement of quality of life [2,3]. Multiple scoring systems are used to assess asthma control, including the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5, 6, and 7, and the recently released Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) [4][5][6]. ...

Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) Control Level Predicts Future Risk of Asthma Exacerbations
  • Citing Article
  • August 2022

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice

... Additionally, the AIRQ is easily implemented asunlike most control tools and PRO measures-it is free of charge for clinicians and independent researchers. A licensing agreement is requested to assure the integrity of the validation of the AIRQ, and it provides the requestor with paper and digital versions of the AIRQ and the Follow-up AIRQ 34 in English, Spanish, and German, if desired. ...

Assessing Construct Validity of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire Using a 3-month Exacerbation Recall
  • Citing Article
  • February 2022

Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology

... Cannabis has the ability to cause allergy responses of type 1 and type 4 (35). When cannabis comes into touch with other plants, whether nearby or far away, allergenic components of thaumatin-like proteins may react, causing allergic responses (36). ...

Cannabis‐related allergies: An international overview and consensus recommendations