Katherine E. Kahn’s research while affiliated with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (26)


Maternal Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination and Receipt of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Antibody (Nirsevimab) by Infants Aged <8 Months - United States, April 2024
  • Article

September 2024

·

9 Reads

·

2 Citations

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

·

Emma Garacci

·

Katherine E Kahn

·

[...]

·

Carla L Black

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of hospitalization among U.S. infants. CDC recommends RSV vaccination for pregnant persons or administration of RSV antibody (nirsevimab) to infants aged <8 months to prevent RSV lower respiratory tract disease among infants. To determine maternal and infant RSV immunization coverage for the 2023-24 RSV season, CDC conducted an Internet panel survey during March 26-April 11, 2024. Among 678 women at 32-36 weeks' gestation during September 2023-January 2024, 32.6% reported receipt of an RSV vaccine any time during pregnancy. Among 866 women with an infant born during August 2023-March 2024, 44.6% reported receipt of nirsevimab by the infant. Overall, 55.8% of infants were protected by maternal RSV vaccine, nirsevimab, or both. Provider recommendation for maternal vaccination or infant nirsevimab was associated with higher immunization coverage, whereas lack of a provider recommendation was the main reason for not getting RSV immunization. The main reason for definitely or probably not getting nirsevimab for infants was concern about the long-term safety for the infant. Activities supporting providers to make RSV prevention recommendations and have informative conversations with patients might increase the proportion of infants protected against severe RSV disease. CDC and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have resources to assist providers in effectively communicating the importance of immunization.


Influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage and Hesitancy Among Pregnant Women — United States, April 2023
  • Article
  • Full-text available

September 2023

·

27 Reads

·

60 Citations

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

Influenza, tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), and COVID-19 vaccines can reduce the risk for influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 among pregnant women and their infants. To assess influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage among women pregnant during the 2022-23 influenza season, CDC analyzed data from an Internet panel survey conducted during March 28-April 16, 2023. Among 1,814 survey respondents who were pregnant at any time during October 2022-January 2023, 47.2% reported receiving influenza vaccine before or during their pregnancy. Among 776 respondents with a live birth by their survey date, 55.4% reported receiving Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. Among 1,252 women pregnant at the time of the survey, 27.3% reported receipt of a COVID-19 bivalent booster dose before or during the current pregnancy. Data from the same questions included in surveys conducted during influenza seasons 2019-20 through 2022-23 show that the proportion of pregnant women who reported being very hesitant about influenza and Tdap vaccinations during pregnancy increased from 2019-20 to 2022-23. Pregnant women who received a provider recommendation for vaccination were less hesitant about influenza and Tdap vaccines. Promotion of efforts to improve vaccination coverage among pregnant women, such as provider recommendation for vaccination and informative conversations with patients to address vaccine hesitancy, might reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase coverage with these important vaccines to protect mothers and their infants against severe respiratory diseases.

Download

Influenza and Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination Coverage During Pregnancy: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2020

June 2023

·

20 Reads

·

3 Citations

Public Health Reports

Objectives: Estimates of vaccination coverage during pregnancy and identification of disparities in vaccination coverage can inform vaccination campaigns and programs. We reported the prevalence of being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine by a health care provider (hereinafter, provider); influenza vaccination coverage during the 12 months before delivery; and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage during pregnancy among women with a recent live birth in the United States. Methods: We analyzed 2020 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 42 US jurisdictions (n = 41 673). We estimated the overall prevalence of being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine by a provider and influenza vaccination coverage during the 12 months before delivery. We estimated Tdap vaccination coverage during pregnancy from 21 jurisdictions with available data (n = 22 020) by jurisdiction and select characteristics. Results: In 2020, 84.9% of women reported being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine, and 60.9% received it, ranging from 35.0% in Puerto Rico to 79.7% in Massachusetts. Influenza vaccination coverage was lower among women who were not offered or told to get the influenza vaccine (21.4%) than among women who were offered or told to get the vaccine (68.1%). Overall, 72.7% of women received the Tdap vaccine, ranging from 52.8% in Mississippi to 86.7% in New Hampshire. Influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage varied by all characteristics examined. Conclusions: These results can inform vaccination programs and strategies to address disparities in vaccination coverage during pregnancy and may inform vaccination efforts for other infectious diseases among pregnant women.


Surveillance Systems for Monitoring Vaccination Coverage with Vaccines Recommended for Pregnant Women, United States

March 2023

·

8 Reads

·

2 Citations

Journal of Women's Health

Pregnant women* and their infants are at increased risk for serious influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19-related complications, including preterm birth, low-birth weight, and maternal and fetal death. The advisory committee on immunization practices recommends pregnant women receive tetanus-toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy, and influenza and COVID-19 vaccines before or during pregnancy. Vaccination coverage estimates and factors associated with maternal vaccination are measured by various surveillance systems. The objective of this report is to provide a detailed overview of the following surveillance systems that can be used to assess coverage of vaccines recommended for pregnant women: Internet panel survey, National Health Interview Survey, National Immunization Survey-Adult COVID Module, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, Vaccine Safety Datalink, and MarketScan. Influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage estimates vary by data source, and select estimates are presented. Each surveillance system differs in the population of pregnant women, time period, geographic area for which estimates can be obtained, how vaccination status is determined, and data collected regarding vaccine-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and barriers. Thus, multiple systems are useful for a more complete understanding of maternal vaccination. Ongoing surveillance from the various systems to obtain vaccination coverage and information regarding disparities and barriers related to vaccination are needed to guide program and policy improvements.


COVID-19 Vaccination and Intent Among Pregnant Women, United States, April 2021

June 2022

·

18 Reads

·

11 Citations

Public Health Reports

Objectives: National data on COVID-19 vaccination coverage among pregnant women are limited. We assessed COVID-19 vaccination coverage and intent, factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination, reasons for nonvaccination, and knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to COVID-19 illness and vaccination among pregnant women in the United States. Methods: Data from an opt-in internet panel survey of pregnant women conducted March 31-April 16, 2021, assessed receipt of ≥1 dose of any COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. The sample included 1516 women pregnant any time during December 1, 2020-April 16, 2021, who were not fully vaccinated before pregnancy. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine variables independently associated with receipt of COVID-19 vaccine. Results: As of April 16, 2021, 21.7% of pregnant women had received ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy, 24.0% intended to receive a vaccine, 17.2% were unsure, and 37.1% did not intend to receive a vaccine. Pregnant women with (vs without) a health care provider recommendation (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 4.86), those who lived (vs not) with someone with a condition that could increase risk for serious medical complications of COVID-19 (aPR = 2.11), and those who had received (vs not) an influenza vaccination (aPR = 2.35) were more likely to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Common reasons for nonvaccination included concerns about safety risk to baby (37.2%) or self (34.6%) and about rapid vaccine development (29.7%) and approval (30.9%). Conclusions: Our findings indicate a continued need to emphasize the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and to widely disseminate the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other clinical professional societies for all pregnant women to be vaccinated.


Influenza and Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2019

December 2021

·

32 Reads

·

1 Citation

Background Influenza and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines is recommended for pregnant women to protect themselves and their infants from adverse health outcomes. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of maternal influenza and Tdap vaccination and determine factors associated with receipt of these vaccines. Methods We analyzed 2019 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, from 43 jurisdictions. We estimated the overall prevalence of women reporting receipt of a healthcare provider offer or recommendation for influenza vaccine (n=44,528), and influenza vaccine during the 12 months before delivery (n=44,213). We also estimated Tdap vaccine receipt during pregnancy from the 21 jurisdictions (n=22,972). Maternal influenza and Tdap vaccination were examined by selected maternal characteristics and by jurisdiction. Results Overall, 86.4% of women reported being offered or recommended an influenza vaccination, and 60.8% of women reported receiving an influenza vaccination in the 12 months prior to their delivery, ranging from 36.0% in Puerto Rico to 82.1% in Rhode Island. Tdap receipt during pregnancy was 73.7%, ranging from 52.2% in Mississippi to 85.1% in Vermont. Prevalence of influenza vaccination was lower among women aged 18–24 years (52.2%), who are non-Hispanic black (44.5%), with a high school diploma or less education (51.3%), with no prenatal insurance (43.2%), having no (42.0%) prenatal care, with ≥3 previous live births (49.3%) and not offered or recommended the influenza vaccine by a healthcare provider (20.0%). Tdap vaccination also varied by all characteristics examined and was lower among similar groups of women observed to have lower influenza vaccination uptake. Conclusion In 2019, influenza and Tdap vaccination were suboptimal among women with a recent live birth. It is important that U.S. jurisdictions provide equitable access to these vaccines during pregnancy. These results may also inform efforts for vaccination for other infectious diseases among pregnant women.


COVID-19 vaccination and intent status among adults aged 18-39 years, by sociodemographic characteristics -United States, March-May 2021
COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage and Intent Among Adults Aged 18–39 Years — United States, March–May 2021

June 2021

·

85 Reads

·

143 Citations

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

Since April 19, 2021, all persons aged ≥16 years in the United States have been eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. As of May 30, 2021, approximately one half of U.S. adults were fully vaccinated, with the lowest coverage and lowest reported intent to get vaccinated among young adults aged 18-39 years (1-4). To examine attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination intent among adults in this age group, CDC conducted nationally representative household panel surveys during March-May 2021. Among respondents aged 18-39 years, 34.0% reported having received a COVID-19 vaccine. A total of 51.8% were already vaccinated or definitely planned to get vaccinated, 23.2% reported that they probably were going to get vaccinated or were unsure about getting vaccinated, and 24.9% reported that they probably or definitely would not get vaccinated. Adults aged 18-24 years were least likely to report having received a COVID-19 vaccine and were most likely to report being unsure about getting vaccinated or that they were probably going to get vaccinated. Adults aged 18-39 years with lower incomes, with lower educational attainment, without health insurance, who were non-Hispanic Black, and who lived outside of metropolitan areas had the lowest reported vaccination coverage and intent to get vaccinated. Concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were the primary reported reasons for not getting vaccinated. Vaccination intent and acceptance among adults aged 18-39 years might be increased by improving confidence in vaccine safety and efficacy while emphasizing that vaccines are critical to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to friends and family and for resuming social activities (5).


Rural, urban, and suburban differences in influenza vaccination coverage among children

November 2020

·

52 Reads

·

30 Citations

Vaccine

Influenza vaccination is the primary way to prevent influenza, yet influenza vaccination coverage remains low in the United States. Previous studies have shown that children residing in rural areas have less access to healthcare and lower vaccination coverage for some vaccines. Influenza vaccination coverage among children 6 months–17 years by rural/urban residence during the 2011–12 through 2018–19 influenza seasons was examined using National Immunization Survey-Flu data. The Council of American Survey Research Organizations response rates for National Immunization Survey-Flu ranged from 48% to 65% (2011–12 through the 2017–18 seasons) for the landline sample and 20%–39% (2011–12 through the 2018–19 seasons) for the cellular telephone sample. Children residing in rural areas had influenza vaccination coverage that ranged from 7.9 (2012–13 season) to 12.6 (2016–17 season) percentage points lower than children residing in urban areas, and ranged from 4.5 (2012–13 season) to 7.4 (2016–17 season) percentage points lower than children residing in suburban areas. The differences in influenza vaccination coverage among rural, suburban, and urban children were consistent over the eight seasons studied. Lower influenza vaccination coverage was observed among rural children regardless of child’s age, mother’s education, household income, or number of children under 18 years of age in the household. Rural versus urban and suburban differences in influenza vaccination coverage remained statistically significant while adjusting for selected sociodemographic characteristics. A better understanding of the reasons for lower childhood influenza vaccination coverage for children in rural and suburban areas is needed.


Influenza and Tdap Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women — United States, April 2020

October 2020

·

69 Reads

·

138 Citations

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

Vaccination of pregnant women with influenza vaccine and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) can decrease the risk for influenza and pertussis among pregnant women and their infants. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that all women who are or might be pregnant during the influenza season receive influenza vaccine, which can be administered at any time during pregnancy (1). ACIP also recommends that women receive Tdap during each pregnancy, preferably during the early part of gestational weeks 27-36 (2,3). Despite these recommendations, vaccination coverage among pregnant women has been found to be suboptimal with racial/ethnic disparities persisting (4-6). To assess influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage among women pregnant during the 2019-20 influenza season, CDC analyzed data from an Internet panel survey conducted during April 2020. Among 1,841 survey respondents who were pregnant anytime during October 2019-January 2020, 61.2% reported receiving influenza vaccine before or during their pregnancy, an increase of 7.5 percentage points compared with the rate during the 2018-19 season. Among 463 respondents who had a live birth by their survey date, 56.6% reported receiving Tdap during pregnancy, similar to the 2018-19 season (4). Vaccination coverage was highest among women who reported receiving a provider offer or referral for vaccination (influenza = 75.2%; Tdap = 72.7%). Compared with the 2018-19 season, increases in influenza vaccination coverage were observed during the 2019-20 season for non-Hispanic Black (Black) women (14.7 percentage points, to 52.7%), Hispanic women (9.9 percentage points, to 67.2%), and women of other non-Hispanic (other) races (7.9 percentage points, to 69.6%), and did not change for non-Hispanic White (White) women (60.6%). As in the 2018-19 season, Hispanic and Black women had the lowest Tdap vaccination coverage (35.8% and 38.8%, respectively), compared with White women (65.5%) and women of other races (54.0%); in addition, a decrease in Tdap vaccination coverage was observed among Hispanic women in 2019-20 compared with the previous season. Racial/ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination coverage decreased but persisted, even among women who received a provider offer or referral for vaccination. Consistent provider offers or referrals, in combination with conversations culturally and linguistically tailored for patients of all races/ethnicities, could increase vaccination coverage among pregnant women in all racial/ethnic groups and reduce disparities in coverage.


Figure 1. Enrollment and inclusion of survey participants, Internet Panel Survey, March to April 2018.
Influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage among women with a live birth during August 2017 to March 2018, by health care provider recommendation or offer of vaccination, Internet panel survey, USA.
Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis and Influenza Vaccinations among Women With a Live Birth, Internet Panel Survey, 2017-2018

February 2020

·

118 Reads

·

9 Citations

Infectious Diseases Research and Treatment

Objectives Pregnant women are at increased risk of complications from influenza, and infants are at increased risk of pertussis. Maternal influenza and Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccination can reduce risk of these infections and related complications. Our objective was to estimate vaccination coverage with influenza and Tdap vaccines during pregnancy among women with a recent live birth. Methods An opt-in Internet panel survey was conducted from March 28 to April 10, 2018 among pregnant and recently pregnant women. Respondents with a live birth from August 1, 2017 through the date in which the participant completed the survey were included in the analysis. Receipt of influenza vaccination since July 1, 2017 and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy were assessed by sociodemographic characteristics, receipt of a health care provider (HCP) recommendation and/or offer of vaccination, and vaccination-related knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Results Less than a third (30.3%) of women with a live birth were unvaccinated during their pregnancy with both Tdap and influenza vaccines. Almost a third (32.8%) of the women reported being vaccinated with both vaccines. The majority (73.0%) of women reported receiving an HCP recommendation for both vaccines, and 54.2% of women were offered both vaccines by an HCP. Reasons for nonvaccination included negative attitudes toward influenza vaccine and lack of awareness about Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. Conclusions Maternal Tdap and influenza vaccinations can prevent morbidity and mortality among infants and their mothers, yet many pregnant women are unvaccinated with either Tdap or influenza vaccines. Clinic-based education, along with interventions, such as standing orders and provider reminders, are strategies to increase maternal vaccination.


Citations (23)


... Disadvantages of Abrysvo compared to Nirsevimab include (i) the as-of-yet unknown duration of protection in infants, with at least data from initial clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in protection after a few months, and (ii) the variant seasonality of RSV across different geographical regions which affects the timing of vaccine administration to the mother, and which therefore might reduce compliance and the overall efficacy of vaccine delivery [88]. Furthermore, there is a consistent undercoverage of pregnant women for other vaccine-preventable diseases such as tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, influenza, and COVID-19 [89], which might extend to RSV vaccinations as well. Observational reports have also indicated that vaccination is not a priority for obstetricians, which could further result in low vaccine uptake from pregnant mothers [90]. ...

Reference:

Development, Current Status, and Remaining Challenges for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines
Influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage and Hesitancy Among Pregnant Women — United States, April 2023

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

... 46 For patients undergoing splenectomy, surgeons are responsible for administering appropriate immunizations during the perioperative period to prevent postoperative infections. 47 Additionally, medical visits for menopausal women provide an ideal opportunity to discuss their immunization needs. 48 Overall, these findings highlight that timing is crucial for infectious disease prevention and increasing vaccine coverage. ...

Influenza and Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination Coverage During Pregnancy: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2020
  • Citing Article
  • June 2023

Public Health Reports

... It is vital to assess the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women who have conditions that elevate the risk of preterm birth, such as gestational hypertension and diabetes. These pre-existing conditions markedly increase the likelihood of obstetric complications, and vaccination may offer additional protection for these women [40][41][42]. The current literature provides limited insights into COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women with such conditions, hindering the development of tailored guidelines for this subgroup. ...

Surveillance Systems for Monitoring Vaccination Coverage with Vaccines Recommended for Pregnant Women, United States
  • Citing Article
  • March 2023

Journal of Women's Health

... Among all 44 studies, concerns regarding the safety of the vaccine, both for themselves and their fetuses, were brought up by pregnant persons. Across 37 articles, pregnant participants feared adverse effects and health complications after getting vaccinated, especially for pregnant persons with chronic medical conditions [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]40,[42][43][44][45]49,50,[52][53][54][55][56][57] . Specific concerns mentioned by pregnant persons included infertility 15,21,23,[28][29][30][31] , postpartum hemorrhage 16 , and death 31 . ...

COVID-19 Vaccination and Intent Among Pregnant Women, United States, April 2021
  • Citing Article
  • June 2022

Public Health Reports

... There is no evidence to indicate that TT administered during pregnancy is teratogenic (Khodr et al., 2017;Dhia & Biaee, 2017;Liang et al., 2018). Moreover, the TT vaccine has been coadministered with other vaccines during pregnancy, such as the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine, to confer passive immunity to infants for the first several months of life (Egan et al., 2023;Oduyebo et al., 2022;Khan et al., 2018). In Ethiopia, studies have highlighted determinants of poor TT immunization, emphasizing the need for improved vaccination uptake among mothers who recently gave birth (Gebremedhin et al., 2020;Zhang et al., 2022). ...

Influenza and Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2019

... 64 Randomized control trial study Randomized control trials (RCT) can be used to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between vitamin D and Depression, and reduce chances of selection bias. 65 Population Adolescents 60,66,67 (defined by ≥10 and 17≤) and young adults 68,69 (≥18 and ≤39) This is the most relevant population to our research topic, because depression is more likely to start during adolescence and this population is less likely to experience morbidity that would increase the risk for depression. 70 If feasible, we would plan to evaluate studies of young adults (≥18 and ≤39), and perhaps a separately subgroup-analysis of adolescents (≥11 and 17≤) to extend our findings. ...

COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage and Intent Among Adults Aged 18–39 Years — United States, March–May 2021

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

... 13 In rural areas, residents' awareness of influenza knowledge and the situation of influenza vaccine vaccination are not optimistic, and the difference between urban and rural areas is still obvious. 14 Nowadays, as the global population ages, there is an urgent need for deep understanding of current situation and targeted interventions for influenza vaccination among older adults in rural areas. ...

Rural, urban, and suburban differences in influenza vaccination coverage among children
  • Citing Article
  • November 2020

Vaccine

... Recent population-based cohort studies in Australia reported maternal influenza vaccination rates ranging from 35% to 40% [13]. Similarly, in South Australia, maternal pertussis vaccination increased from 59% in 2016 to 72% in 2018, exceeding uptake rates reported in other high-income countries such as the United States (54% in 2018) [17] and the United Kingdom (68% in 2018) [18]. This improvement coincides with the introduction of state-funded antenatal pertussis immunization programs in 2015 and the vaccine's inclusion in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in 2018. ...

Influenza and Tdap Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women — United States, April 2020

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

... Maternal pertussis vaccination in pregnancy, effective in reducing infant disease, is a more recent recommendation in Italy [26], which may partly explain why only one in three mothers chose to adhere compared to 54.9% for the Tdap vaccine in the USA in 2019 to 79.4% in Spain in 2018 [27,28]. ...

Vital Signs : Burden and Prevention of Influenza and Pertussis Among Pregnant Women and Infants — United States

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

... In the study by Ding et al. [26] conducted in the United States, they evaluated the coverage of flu vaccine during pregnancy in three seasons (2012-2015) using the National Health Interview Survey in the United States. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for vaccination coverage before and during pregnancy in each season, showing similar coverage rates of 40.4%, 45.4%, and 43.1%, respectively. ...

Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women in the U.S., 2012–2015
  • Citing Article
  • February 2019

American Journal of Preventive Medicine