January 2025
·
13 Reads
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
January 2025
·
13 Reads
January 2025
·
2 Reads
December 2024
·
77 Reads
Biological soil crusts are integral to Arctic ecosystems, playing a crucial role in primary production, nitrogen fixation and nutrient cycling, as well as maintaining soil stability. However, the composition and complex relationships between the diverse organisms within these biocrusts are not well studied. This study investigates how the microbial community composition within Arctic biocrusts is influenced by environmental factors along an altitudinal gradient (101 m to 314 m). Metagenomic analyses were used to provide insights into the community composition, revealing that temperature, pH, and nutrient availability significantly shaped the community. In contrast, altitude did not directly influence the microbial composition significantly. Eukaryotic communities were dominated by Chloroplastida and fungi, while Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria prevailed among prokaryotes. Cyanobacteria, particularly orders such as Pseudoanabaenales, Pleurocapsales, and Nostocales, emerged as the most abundant photoautotrophic organisms. Our findings highlight the impact of environmental gradients on microbial diversity and the functional dynamics of biocrusts, emphasizing their critical role in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Arctic biocrusts are intricate micro-ecosystems, whose structure is strongly shaped by local physicochemical parameters, likely affecting essential ecological functions.
November 2024
·
55 Reads
Biological soil crusts are integral to Arctic ecosystems, playing a crucial role in primary production, nitrogen fixation and nutrient cycling, as well as maintaining soil stability. However, the composition and complex relationships between the diverse organisms within these biocrusts are not well studied. This study investigates how microbial community composition within Arctic biocrusts is influenced by environmental factors along an altitudinal gradient (106 m to 306 m). Metagenomic analyses were used to provide insights into the community composition, revealing that temperature, pH, and nutrient availability significantly shaped the community. In contrast, altitude directly did not influence the microbial composition significantly. Eukaryotic communities were dominated by Chloroplastida and Fungi, while Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria prevailed among prokaryotes. Cyanobacteria, particularly orders such as Pseudoanabaenales, Pleurocapsales, and Nostocales, emerged as the most abundant photoautotrophic organisms. Our findings highlight the impact of environmental gradients on microbial diversity and the functional dynamics of biocrusts in the Arctic.
August 2024
·
209 Reads
Phycology
While molecular methods have begun to transform ecology, most algal biodiversity is still studied using the classical approach of identifying microalgae by light microscopy directly in sample material or using cultures. In this study, we compare both approaches (light microscopy and metagenomics as a molecular approach) using the freshwater ponds of the Eifel National Park in Germany as a case study. The ponds were found to be rich in desmids by light microscopy. A total of 299 species representing 81 genera were identified by light microscopy. While the molecular method does not currently allow species identification in most cases, we were able to identify 207 different algal genera. In total, 157 genera were detected only by metagenomics, 50 genera were found with both methods, and 31 genera were found by light microscopy, highlighting the need to continue using light microscopy in addition to a molecular approach. The metagenomics method has several advantages over the light microscopy method: (1) deeper assessment of alpha biodiversity, (2) better abundance numbers, and (3) complete coverage of all living matter. The latter is also a significant improvement over metabarcoding, as universal PCR primers are not available.
June 2024
·
55 Reads
While molecular methods have begun to transform ecology, most algal biodiversity is still studied using the classical approach of identifying microalgae by light microscopy directly in sample material or using cultures. In this study, we compare both approaches (light microscopy and metagenomics as a molecular approach) using freshwater ponds of the Eifel National Park in Germany as a case study. The ponds were found to be rich in desmids by light microscopy. A total of 299 species representing 81 genera were identified by light microscopy. While the molecular method does not currently allow species identification in most cases, we were able to identify 207 different algal genera. 157 genera were detected only by metagenomics, 50 genera with both methods and 31 genera were found by light microscopy, highlighting the need to continue using light microscopy in addition to a molecular approach. The metagenomics method has several advantages over the light microscopy method: 1) deeper assessment of alpha biodiversity 2) better abundance numbers 3) complete coverage of all living matter. The latter is also a significant improvement over metabarcoding, as universal PCR primers are not available.