Karin Steijven’s research while affiliated with University of Wuerzburg and other places

Learning curves and retention tests of honeybees that were conditioned in an additional experiment to show that bees could associate either odor equally well with a reward In 12 trials bees were presented with either CS+ or CS − (haphazard order) and PER was recorded. After 1 h and 48 h memory of the conditioned respons was tested (retention). Asterisks show the level of statistical difference between CS+ and CS−, with ***: p < 0.001. Regardless which odour was used as CS+ or and as CS−, most bees were able to distinguish odours in the aquisition fase, and during the retention fase. A) Here 1-nonanol was used as CS+ (grey) and 1-hexanol as CS− (black). (B) Here results of the reciprocal conditioning are shown: for CS+ (grey) 1-hexanol was used, and for CS− (black) 1-nonanol was used.

Data on intertegula span and head width

Background Artificial rearing of honey bee larvae is an established method which enables to fully standardize the rearing environment and to manipulate the supplied diet to the brood. However, there are no studies which compare learning performance or neuroanatomic differences of artificially-reared (in-lab) bees in comparison with their in-hive reared counterparts. Methods Here we tested how different quantities of food during larval development affect body size, brain morphology and learning ability of adult honey bees. We used in-lab rearing to be able to manipulate the total quantity of food consumed during larval development. After hatching, a subset of the bees was taken for which we made 3D reconstructions of the brains using confocal laser-scanning microscopy. Learning ability and memory formation of the remaining bees was tested in a differential olfactory conditioning experiment. Finally, we evaluated how bees reared with different quantities of artificial diet compared to in-hive reared bees. Results Thorax and head size of in-lab reared honey bees, when fed the standard diet of 160 µl or less, were slightly smaller than hive bees. The brain structure analyses showed that artificially reared bees had smaller mushroom body (MB) lateral calyces than their in-hive counterparts, independently of the quantity of food they received. However, they showed the same total brain size and the same associative learning ability as in-hive reared bees. In terms of mid-term memory, but not early long-term memory, they performed even better than the in-hive control. Discussion We have demonstrated that bees that are reared artificially (according to the Aupinel protocol) and kept in lab-conditions perform the same or even better than their in-hive sisters in an olfactory conditioning experiment even though their lateral calyces were consistently smaller at emergence. The applied combination of experimental manipulation during the larval phase plus subsequent behavioral and neuro-anatomic analyses is a powerful tool for basic and applied honey bee research.

Acquisition data, or PER data during acquisition phase (the learning phase) of the olfactory conditioning experiment

Bee brain data used for the comparison of different brain neuropils

Retention data, or PER during the 1 h and 48 h retention tests (part of the olfactory conditioning experiment)

Explosive pollen release is documented in many plant families, including the Fabaceae. Desmodium setigerum E. Mey (Fabaceae) is a perennial herb with single trip explosive pollen release found in eastern Africa, and the unique ability to reverse floral colour change if insufficient pollination has occurred. However, little else is known about the pollination ecology of this species, what visitors can trigger explosive pollen release, and whether bee body size is related to pollination efficiency. We investigated: 1) the breeding system of D. setigerum, and whether it is pollen limited; 2) whether flowers are visited early in the day allowing sufficient time for a second opportunity for pollination; and 3) what insect species visit D. setigerum and the relative efficacy of different flower visitors in relation to visitor size and pollination success. We found that although self-compatible, D. setigerum requires insect visitation to set seed as explosive pollen release is needed even for selfing. Most flowers are initially visited before 1400h, and by 1800h nearly all flowers have been tripped. Flowers were not pollen limited in this study, and were visited primarily by bees. We observed 16 visiting species, and there was a wide variation (0-404 grains) in the amount of pollen deposited on stigmas. Although almost all bees deposited some pollen, the mean number of pollen grains deposited in a single visit per species was negatively related to body size. However, one particular megachilid species deposited significantly more pollen grains than any other visitor and so is likely an important pollinator of this species. This provides insights into the pollination biology of this unique plant species, and adds to increasing literature on the relationships between bee body size, explosive pollen release and pollination effectiveness.

.

In agricultural landscapes all over the world, honey bees are exposed to genetically modified (GM) pollen. Stacked Bt-maize varieties combine multiple Bt proteins against different insect taxa with herbicide resistance. To test for potential effects on non-target organisms, we conducted an in vitro larvae-rearing experiment where we fed increasing amounts of stacked Bt pollen to honey bee larvae. Bt pollen was equally well digested as two control maize varieties. No dose-dependent effects of Bt maize were detected in terms of survival and developmental delay. However, for prepupal weight we did find a dose-dependent response, suggesting a pleiotropic effect. Comparing this finding with the literature we conclude that the found effect is not likely to occur in a field situation. We could however show that dose-dependent effects are detectable. Our results underline the importance of testing dose-depending effects of GM plant material in an environmental risk assessment (ERA).