Kabir Arora’s research while affiliated with Maastricht University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


30th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2021
  • Conference Paper
  • Full-text available

December 2021

·

2,293 Reads

·

1 Citation

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

Wolf Singer

·

William Bialek

·

Danielle Bassett

·

[...]

·

Foreword from the editors. We hosted four keynote speakers: Wolf Singer, Bill Bialek, Danielle Bassett, and Sonja Gruen. They enlightened us about computations in the cerebral cortex, the reduction of high-dimensional data, the emerging field of computational psychiatry, and the significance of spike patterns in motor cortex. From the submissions, we also selected four featured orals as particularly noteworthy. They discussed a new role for cortical oscillations as a tempering mechanism, branch-specific computations in Purkinje cells, low frequency entrainment in processing sign language, and decreasing neural heterogeneity as a unifying sign of epilepsy. An additional 16 submissions were selected for shorter oral presentation in the plenary sessions, touching subjects such a spike and population coding, neural computation and interaction, astrocytic and dopaminergic modulation of plasticity, several kinds of sensory processing, reward learning, respiratory and motor control, neural activity propagation and synchronization, and brain organization in epilepsy and schizophrenia. We were also very pleased by the quality of the 213 presented posters, which drew a strong attendance, and the resulting online interactions between presenters and attendees. The full breadth of computational neuroscience was represented, from theory and method development over data analysis to applications.

Download

Figure 3. Layering metrics generated in LayNii. The top row shows an application with a synthetic 2D image. The middle row shows the empirical layers from Ding et al. (2016) (0.2 mm iso.). The bottom row shows BigBrain (0.1 mm iso., native space) (Amunts et al. 2013) with cortical borders provided in Wagstyl et al. (2020). The equi-distant metric is shown in the middle column and equi-volume metric is shown in the right column for each image type. To better appreciate the difference between the equi-volume and equi-distance layers on the BigBrain data, see the gif animation in Fig. 6) online: https://thingsonthings.org/ln2_layers/. The arrows highlight areas where the equi-distant and the equi-volume metric differ considerably.
Figure 4. Examples of the layerification in native distorted EPI space Example of performing layerification on the whole brain fMRI at 0.8 mm isotropic resolutions. Here, an example is shown with three extracted layers. Typically, at 0.8mm resolutions, not more than 2-3 layers can be extracted without losing smoothness along the three dimensional cortical folding (bottom left panel). However, when the layerification is performed on a finer spatial grid, the smoothness is improved (top panels).
Figure 10. Layer-dependent model-based deveining strategies. The three most often used strategies of layer-dependent vein mitigation are based on a linear offset model, a scaling model, or a leakage model. The respective models are illustrated in panel A. While all models can be used to predict the increasing GE-BOLD signal towards the cortical surface, their assumed physiological signal origin and the corresponding vein mitigation algorithm is fundamentally different. Panel B exemplifies the application of layer-dependent vein mitigation in LayNii and depicts representative results. and SUMA to generate an input rim file for LayNii here: (https://layerfmri.com/getting-layers-in-epi-space/), this segmentation can be further corrected with the semi-manual segmentation tool Segmentator (Gulban et al. 2018) (https: //github.com/ofgulban/segmentator). The LayNii program LN_RIMIFY can be used to convert the segmentation output of common third-party software tools to a LayNii-readable rim file.
LayNii: A software suite for layer-fMRI

May 2021

·

292 Reads

·

109 Citations

NeuroImage

High-resolution fMRI in the sub-millimeter regime allows researchers to resolve brain activity across cortical layers and columns non-invasively. While these high-resolution data make it possible to address novel questions of directional information flow within and across brain circuits, the corresponding data analyses are challenged by MRI artifacts, including image blurring, image distortions, low SNR, and restricted coverage. These challenges often result in insufficient spatial accuracy of conventional analysis pipelines. Here we introduce a new software suite that is specifically designed for layer-specific functional MRI: LayNii. This toolbox is a collection of command-line executable programs written in C/C++ and is distributed opensource and as pre-compiled binaries for Linux, Windows, and macOS. LayNii is designed for layer-fMRI data that suffer from SNR and coverage constraints and thus cannot be straightforwardly analyzed in alternative software packages. Some of the most popular programs of LayNii contain ‘layerification’ and columnarization in the native voxel space of functional data as well as many other layer-fMRI specific analysis tasks: layerspecific smoothing, model-based vein mitigation of GE-BOLD data, quality assessment of artifact dominated sub-millimeter fMRI, as well as analyses of VASO data.


Figure 3. Layering metrics generated in LAYNII. The top row shows an application with a synthetic 2D image. The middle row shows the empirical layers from Ding et al. (2016) (0.2 mm iso.). The bottom row shows BigBrain (0.1 mm iso., native space) (Amunts et al. 2013) with cortical borders provided in Wagstyl et al. (2020). The equi-distant metric is shown in the middle column and equi-volume metric is shown in the right column for each image type. 2020a), e) or for cortical unfolding (Persichetti et al. 2020). In LAYNII, columnar distances are calculated in a six-step algorithm that is schematically illustrated in Fig. 4A:
Figure 4. Estimating columnar units in voxel space with LAYNII. Panel A) schematically described the underlying algorithm of LAYNII's column estimation. Panel B) depicts the corresponding MRI signal in two independent coordinate systems: a) the scanner coordinate system with folded GM and b) the unfolded cortical ribbon with orthogonalized layers and columns. Panel C) depicts a potential application study of the columnar coordinate system for topographic mapping of functional movement representations. The data presented in panels A-B) are acquired with an 8 weeks old female cat, Varian 9.4T at CMRR, resolution: 0.125 x 0.125 x 0.5 mm3, Gradient Echo MultiSlice imaging sequence (GEMS, Agilent technology, Inc.) sequence. The data presented in panel C) are acquired with VASO at a SIEMENS magnetom 7T at FMRIF/NIH with 0.8 mm3 resolution and have been previously described in (Huber et al. 2020b).
Figure 7. Spatiotemporal noise kernel. Panel A) depicts the major algorithm steps to estimate the noise kernel. Panel B) depicts representative results of the noise kernel in the whole-brain VASO layer-fMRI. It can be seen that the PSF in the second phase encoding direction has negative sidelobes, which suggests that the PSF is not well characterizable with FWHM estimates.
Figure 8. VASO processing at high magnetic fields with the LAYNII program LN_ BOCO.
Figure 9. Layer-dependent vein removal strategies. The three most often used strategies of layer-dependent de-veining are based on a linear offset model, a scaling model, or a leakage model. The respective models are illustrated in panel A. While all models can be used to predict the increasing GE-BOLD signal towards the cortical surface, their assumed physiological signal origin and the corresponding de-veining algorithm is fundamentally different. Panel B exemplifies the application of layer-dependent de-veining in LAYNII and depicts representative results.
LayNii: A software suite for layer-fMRI

June 2020

·

387 Reads

·

2 Citations

High-resolution fMRI in the sub-millimeter regime allows researchers to resolve brain activity across cortical layers and columns non-invasively. While these high-resolution data make it possible to address novel questions of directional information flow within and across brain circuits, the corresponding data analyses are challenged by MRI artifacts, including image blurring, image distortions, low SNR, and restricted coverage. These challenges often result in insufficient performance accuracy of conventional analysis pipelines. Here we introduce a new software suite that is specifically designed for layer-specific functional MRI: LAYNII. This toolbox is a collection of commandline executable programs written in C/C++ and is distributed open-source and as pre-compiled binaries for Linux, Windows, and macOS. LAYNII is designed for layer-fMRI data that suffer from SNR and coverage constraints and thus cannot be straight-forwardly analysed in alternative software packages. Some of the most popular programs of LAYNII contain ‘layerification’ and columnarization in the native voxel space of functional data as well as many other layer-fMRI specific analysis tasks: layer-specific smoothing, vein-removal of GE-BOLD data, quality assessment of artifact dominated sub-millimeter fMRI, as well as analyses of VASO data. Highlights A new software toolbox is introduced for layer-specific functional MRI: LAYNII. LAYNII is a suite of command-line executable C++ programs for Linux, Windows, and macOS. LAYNII is designed for layer-fMRI data that suffer from SNR and coverage constraints. LAYNII performs layerification in the native voxel space of functional data. LAYNII performs layer-smoothing, GE-BOLD vein removal, QA, and VASO analysis. Graphical abstract

Citations (2)


... uk/ fsl/ fslwi ki/ ) and intersecting the dilated images with the original GM mask. The pial surface, WM surface, and GM mask were then input into the LAYNII tools (Huber et al. 2021) to divide the entire GM cortex into eight equidistant laminae for each case. The innermost and outermost laminae were excluded to reduce segmentation errors due to partial volume effects. ...

Reference:

Layer‐Dependent Effect of Aβ‐Pathology on Cortical Microstructure With Ex Vivo Human Brain Diffusion MRI at 7 Tesla
LayNii: A software suite for layer-fMRI

NeuroImage