Kaan Mika’s research while affiliated with University of Lausanne and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Molecular, anatomical, and developmental properties of the peripheral olfactory system in D. melanogaster. (A) Schematic of the two main insect olfactory receptor families. Odorant receptors (Ors) are seven transmembrane domain proteins that form heteromeric odor-gated ion channels composed of subunits of a ligand-specific (“tuning”) receptor and a co-receptor, Orco. Ionotropic receptors (Irs) are distantly related to ionotropic glutamate receptors, and function as odor-gated channel complexes composed of tuning Ir subunits and co-receptors (Ir8a or Ir25a). (B) Left: schematic of the D. melanogaster head (facing left) illustrating the main olfactory organs (antennae and maxillary palps, gray shading) and connectivity of two populations of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) to the antennal lobe in the brain. Right: schematic of the antenna, which is covered with diverse classes of sensory sensilla; the cellular organization of one sensillum, housing two OSNs, is shown on the far right (see text). (C) Left: schematic of the larval antennal imaginal disc, showing the concentric arcs of cells where different sensory organ precursors (SOP) are born. Amos- and Atonal-positive arcs give rise to OSN lineages expressing Ors and Irs, respectively, while other patterning determinants (not shown) are thought to specify SOP identity for different sensilla subtypes. Right: a simplified developmental lineage of an SOP producing a sensillum class with two OSNs. Two other potential neurons are removed by programmed cell death (PCD). Delta/Notch signaling determines the asymmetry of cell divisions, while many other patterning factors (not shown) are involved in specifying cell identity, encompassing both receptor expression and glomerular targeting of different OSNs (see text).
Models of olfactory receptor expression in insects. (A) Summary of the mechanisms ensuring the neuron-specific transcription of olfactory receptors through the combinatorial action of CREs and TFs to promote RNA polymerase II transcription of a specific receptor gene in an olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) (only the neuronal nuclei are shown). In these hypothetical examples, OrX requires binding of both yellow and blue TFs to corresponding CREs to be expressed; either alone is insufficient. OrY requires the cooperative binding of the red TF to clustered CREs for expression; this cooperation can ensure robust expression in the face of environmental temperature changes; by contrast, the red TF does not bind to the single corresponding CRE upstream of OrX in these neurons. OrZ transcription is promoted by the green TF but suppressed by the yellow TF that binds 3′ of the gene. Other external factors might influence levels, though not spatial patterning, of receptor expression (see text). (B) Chromatin marks and histone-modifying enzymes contributing to the selective expression of olfactory receptors. Different enzymes display differences in their temporal expression and requirement; among these, dLsd1 – which is normally associated with removing H3K4 methylation – appears to have roles in OSNs in both promoting and repressing Or expression (see text). Although schematized separately for clarity, chromatin regulation is intimately related to the combinatorial binding of TFs to receptor loci. (C) Feedback mechanisms contributing to the refinement and/or stability of receptor expression. Transcriptional interference by OrX of OrY might occur when inefficient transcriptional termination at the 3′ end of the former gene leads to the RNA polymerase II impeding transcription initiation at OrY (solid wavy orange and purple lines represent protein coding transcripts from OrX and OrY, respectively; the dashed purple line represents the 3′UTR of OrX transcripts that incorporate sequences encoded by OrY that are not translated into OrY) (Mika et al., 2021). Receptor protein-dependent feedback on transcript or protein levels of other (not necessarily closely linked) receptors occurs through unknown mechanisms (Maguire et al., 2020; Jafari et al., 2021; Mika et al., 2021).
Olfactory Receptor Gene Regulation in Insects: Multiple Mechanisms for Singular Expression
  • Literature Review
  • Full-text available

September 2021

·

163 Reads

·

19 Citations

Kaan Mika

·

The singular expression of insect olfactory receptors in specific populations of olfactory sensory neurons is fundamental to the encoding of odors in patterns of neuronal activity in the brain. How a receptor gene is selected, from among a large repertoire in the genome, to be expressed in a particular neuron is an outstanding question. Focusing on Drosophila melanogaster, where most investigations have been performed, but incorporating recent insights from other insect species, we review the multilevel regulatory mechanisms of olfactory receptor expression. We discuss how cis-regulatory elements, trans-acting factors, chromatin modifications, and feedback pathways collaborate to activate and maintain expression of the chosen receptor (and to suppress others), highlighting similarities and differences with the mechanisms underlying singular receptor expression in mammals. We also consider the plasticity of receptor regulation in response to environmental cues and internal state during the lifetime of an individual, as well as the evolution of novel expression patterns over longer timescales. Finally, we describe the mechanisms and potential significance of examples of receptor co-expression.

Download

Fig. 2. Ir75c-dependent repression of Ir75b and Ir75a expression. (A) Top: Detailed structure of the Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a loci, indicating qRT-PCR primers and the predicted polyadenylation (polyA) site. Bottom: Heatmap representation of expression levels of seven isoforms encoded by these genes, determined by RNA-seq of antennae from control flies (peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;VIE-260B/+). FKPM, fragments per kilobase million. (B) Relative expression levels (assessed by RNA-seq) of the seven transcript isoforms in antennae of individual biological replicates (n = 3) of peb>E93 RNAi flies (peb-Gal4,UAS-Dcr-2/+;UAS-E93 RNAi#2 /+) normalized to the mean of control samples [genotype as in (A)]. The black bars represent the mean. Two-sample t test (comparing the means of E93 RNAi and control samples without normalization): **P < 0.001 and *P < 0.05; NS, P > 0.05. (C) Relative expression (assessed by qRT-PCR) of Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a transcripts in peb>E93 RNAi antennae normalized to the mean of the controls [genotypes are as in (A)]. The primer pairs used do not distinguish different isoforms for a given gene. Each dot represents the mean value of three technical replicates. Two-sample t test was performed for ddCt values (comparing the means of E93 RNAi and control samples without normalization): *P < 0.05; NS, P > 0.05 (n = 3 biological replicates). (D) Representative images of Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a immunofluorescence in antennae of control (left) and E93 RNAi (right) animals in Ir75c +/+ , Ir75c +/− , or Ir75c −/− backgrounds. Genotypes: Ir8a-Gal4/+, Ir8a-Gal4/+;Ir75c MB08510 /+, Ir8a-Gal4/+;Ir75c MB08510 /Ir75c MB08510 , Ir8a-Gal4/UAS-E93 RNAi#1 , Ir8a-Gal4/ UAS-E93 RNAi#1 ;Ir75c MB08510 /+, and Ir8a-Gal4/UAS-E93 RNAi#1 ;Ir75c MB08510 /Ir75c MB08510 . Scale bar, 20 m. (E) Quantification of neuron numbers in the genotypes shown in (D). Pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test and P values adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Benjamini and Hochberg method: **P < 0.001 and *P < 0.05; NS, P > 0.05.
Fig. 3. Posttranscriptional inhibition of Ir75a and Ir75b by Ir75c protein. (A) Representative images of Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a immunofluorescence in antennae of control (Ir8a-Gal4/+), Ir75c misexpression (Ir8a-Gal4/UAS-Ir75c), and Ir75a misexpression (Ir8a-Gal4/UAS-Ir75a) animals. Scale bar, 20 m. A region of interest is shown at higher magnification to the right of each image. Scale bar, 10 m. Yellow and cyan arrowheads indicate neurons with strong and weak receptor expression, respectively. (B) Quantification of neuron numbers in the genotypes shown in (A) (Ir75a quantification in Ir8a>Ir75a antennae and Ir75c quantification in Ir8a>Ir75c antennae are not shown, as neuron density, comprising the entire Ir8a population, is too high for unambiguous scoring). Pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test and P values adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni method: **P < 0.001 and *P < 0.05; NS, P > 0.05. (C) Quantification of the mean number of neurons with strong and weak immunofluorescence signals [see arrowheads in (A)] in the genotypes shown in (A). (D) Representative images of Ir75c RNA FISH and Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a immunofluorescence in antennae of control (Ir8a-Gal4/+), Ir75c misexpression (Ir8a-Gal4/UAS-Ir75c), and Ir75c ATG>TGA misexpression (Ir8a-Gal4/UAS-Ir75c ATG>TGA ) animals. Yellow arrowheads indicate examples of neurons expressing Ir75c RNA ectopically. Ectopic Ir75c protein signal is detected only in antennae expressing UAS-Ir75c but not UAS-Ir75c ATG>TGA (e.g., in regions highlighted with dashed ovals). Scale bar, 20 m. (E) Quantification of neuron numbers in the genotypes shown in (D) (Ir75c quantification for Ir8a>Ir75c antennae is not shown, as neuron density, comprising the entire Ir8a population, is too high for unambiguous scoring). Pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test and P values adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni method: **P < 0.001 and *P < 0.05; NS, P > 0.05. It is unknown why Ir75b and Ir75a neuron numbers increase slightly upon expression of UAS-Ir75c ATG>TGA . (F) Quantification of the number of neurons with strong and weak immunofluorescence signals in the genotypes shown in (D).
Fig. 5. Ectopic expression of Ir75b and Ir75a in Ir75c mutant neurons. (A) Representative images of Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a immunofluorescence in control (w 1118 ), Ir75c −/− (Ir75c MB08510 /Ir75c MB08510 ), and Ir75b −/− (Ir75b DsRed /Ir75b DsRed ) antennae. Scale bar, 20 m. (B) Quantification of neuron numbers in the genotypes shown in (A). Pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test and P values adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Benjamini and Hochberg method: **P < 0.001 and *P < 0.05; NS, P > 0.05. (C) Representative images of Ir75b and Ir75a immunofluorescence for a subset of Ir75c neurons [labeled with RedStinger (gray)] in Ir75c +/− and Ir75c −/− antennae. Yellow arrowheads mark Ir75c −/− neurons that ectopically express Ir75b or Ir75a. Genotypes: UAS-RedStinger/+;Ir75c-Gal4,Ir75c MB08510 /+ and UAS-RedStinger/+;Ir75c-Gal4,Ir75c MB08510 / Ir75c MB08510 . Scale bars, 5 m. (D) Quantification of Ir75c neurons that ectopically express Ir75b or Ir75a in Ir75c +/− and Ir75c −/− flies [genotypes as in (C)]. Pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test and P values adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni method: **P < 0.001. In the control Ir75c immunofluorescence samples, all neurons [81 of 81 (100%)] express both Ir75c and Ir75c>RedStinger. Ectopic expression of Ir75b and Ir75a in Ir75c −/− neurons appeared to be mutually exclusive [only 1 of 18 (5.5%) neurons expressed both of these receptors, presumably, in part, due to the repressive effect of Ir75b expression on Ir75a (Fig. 4)].
Fig. 6. Model of the regulatory interactions between Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a. Schematics of the predicted interactions between Ir75c, Ir75b, and Ir75a gene products in each neuron class in wild-type, E93 RNAi , pdm3 RNAi , and Ir75c −/− genetic backgrounds. RNA polymerase II complexes (RNA polII) are shaded yellow. Protein-coding transcripts and long 3′ untranslated region extensions (lacking the first exons of the downstream genes) are shown as unbroken and broken lines, respectively. It is unknown whether E93 and Pdm3 inhibit transcription of Ir75c and Ir75b, respectively, directly or indirectly (indicated by dashed lines). Pdm3 is selectively expressed in Ir75a neurons (19).
Olfactory receptor-dependent receptor repression in Drosophila

August 2021

·

191 Reads

·

14 Citations

Science Advances

Kaan Mika

·

·

Phing Chian Chai

·

[...]

·

In olfactory systems across phyla, most sensory neurons express a single olfactory receptor gene selected from a large genomic repertoire. We describe previously unknown receptor gene-dependent mechanisms that ensure singular expression of receptors encoded by a tandem gene array [Ionotropic receptor 75c (Ir75c), Ir75b, and Ir75a, organized 5' to 3'] in Drosophila melanogaster Transcription from upstream genes in the cluster runs through the coding region of downstream loci and inhibits their expression in cis, most likely via transcriptional interference. Moreover, Ir75c blocks accumulation of other receptor proteins in trans through a protein-dependent, posttranscriptional mechanism. These repression mechanisms operate in endogenous neurons, in conjunction with cell type-specific gene regulatory networks, to ensure unique receptor expression. Our data provide evidence for inter-olfactory receptor regulation in invertebrates and highlight unprecedented, but potentially widespread, mechanisms for ensuring exclusive expression of chemosensory receptors, and other protein families, encoded by tandemly arranged genes.


Olfactory receptor-dependent receptor repression in Drosophila

April 2021

·

77 Reads

·

1 Citation

In olfactory systems across phyla, most sensory neurons transcribe a single olfactory receptor gene selected from a large genomic repertoire. We describe novel receptor gene-dependent mechanisms that ensure singular expression of receptors encoded by a tandem gene array in Drosophila . Transcription from upstream genes in the cluster runs through the coding region of downstream loci to inhibit their expression in cis , via transcriptional interference. Moreover, one receptor blocks expression of other receptor proteins in trans through a post-transcriptional mechanism. These repression mechanisms operate in endogenous neurons to ensure their unique expression. Our data provide evidence for inter-olfactory receptor regulation in invertebrates, and highlight unprecedented, but potentially widespread, mechanisms for ensuring exclusive expression of chemosensory receptors, and other protein families, encoded by tandemly-arranged genes.


Targeted molecular profiling of rare olfactory sensory neurons identifies fate, wiring and functional determinants

March 2021

·

101 Reads

·

9 Citations

eLife

Determining the molecular properties of neurons is essential to understand their development, function and evolution. Using Targeted DamID (TaDa), we characterize RNA polymerase II occupancy and chromatin accessibility in selected Ionotropicreceptor (Ir)-expressing olfactory sensory neurons in Drosophila. Although individual populations represent a minute fraction of cells, TaDa is sufficiently sensitive and specific to identify the expected receptor genes. Unique Ir expression is not consistently associated with differences in chromatin accessibility, but rather to distinct transcription factor profiles. Genes that are heterogeneously-expressed across populations are enriched for neurodevelopmental factors, and we identify functions for the POU-domain protein Pdm3 as a genetic switch of Ir neuron fate, and the atypical cadherin Flamingo in segregation of neurons into discrete glomeruli. Together this study reveals the effectiveness of TaDa in profiling rare neural populations, identifies new roles for a transcription factor and a neuronal guidance molecule, and provides valuable datasets for future exploration.


Targeted molecular profiling of rare cell populations identifies olfactory sensory neuron fate and wiring determinants

July 2020

·

52 Reads

Determining the molecular properties of neurons is essential to understand their development, function and evolution. We used Targeted DamID (TaDa) to characterize RNA polymerase II occupancy and chromatin accessibility in selected Ionotropic Receptor (IR)-expressing sensory neurons in the Drosophila antenna. Although individual populations represent a minute fraction of cells, TaDa is sufficiently sensitive and specific to identify the expected receptor genes. Unique Ir expression is not linked to substantial differences in chromatin accessibility, but rather to distinct transcription factor profiles. Heterogeneously-expressed genes across populations are enriched for neurodevelopmental factors, and we identify functions for the POU-domain protein Pdm3 as a genetic switch of Ir neuron fate, and the atypical cadherin Flamingo in segregation of neurons into discrete glomeruli. Together this study reveals the effectiveness of TaDa in profiling rare neural populations, identifies new roles for a transcription factor and a neuronal guidance molecule, and provides valuable datasets for future exploration.

Citations (4)


... Although snRNA-seq enables unified profiling of all mosquito tissues, nuclear transcriptomes may not fully reflect cytoplasmic mRNA levels and provide no insights into protein expression 171 . This is particularly relevant for chemoreceptor co-expression studies, where post-transcriptional regulation could affect final receptor composition 172 . In addition, other detected transcripts could be untranslated, as seen in the recent work looking at ORs in the clonal raider ant Ooceraea biroi 173 . ...

Reference:

Mosquito Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult Aedes aegypti mosquito
Olfactory Receptor Gene Regulation in Insects: Multiple Mechanisms for Singular Expression

... Possibly, the existence of an additional subunit such as OR69aC may increase the repertoire of ligands sensed by OR69aA and OR69aB. Indeed, although observed for the different class of IRs odorant receptors, different spectrums of ligand activation have been demonstrated among Drosophila neurons housing in ac2 and ac3 sensilla expressing different IR75-chemosensory subunits [50] that are translated from three splice-forms (IR75c, IR75b, IR75a) transcribed from the same locus (IR75cba, [51]). Future studies testing DsuzOR69aD and DsuzOR69aE subunits, as additional transcript variants from the DsuzOR69a-locus, will validate if this hypothesis holds true. ...

Olfactory receptor-dependent receptor repression in Drosophila
  • Citing Preprint
  • April 2021

... This technique has been used to analyze gene expression in carpet glia, present in the ocular discs of third instar Drosophila larvae, associated with the morphological alterations during eye development 35 . Likewise, it has been applied to study the gene expression profile of neuronal populations that express Ionotropic Receptors (IRs) found in the third antennal segment of Drosophila 36 . ...

Targeted molecular profiling of rare olfactory sensory neurons identifies fate, wiring and functional determinants

eLife