K. Grandy’s research while affiliated with Technische Universität Berlin and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Fig. 1A±E Conditioning and testing of free-¯ying bees and bees under laboratory conditions. A Schematic drawing of the test cube (80 cm´80cm´cm´80 cm´80cm´cm´80 cm) used for conditioning and testing of free¯ying bees. Two of the four walls were used for conditioning and the other two walls for testing. On each wall a vertical and a horizontal pattern was o€ered to the bee. The bees could enter small tubes in the centre of the discs. The animals were conditioned to the vertical pattern. The two conditioning walls were changed in random order between conditioning trials. The bees were tested using the two testing walls which were changed every minute (for further details see text). B±E Schematic drawing of conditioning and testing in the laboratory using the proboscis extension re¯ex: B the bee was ®xed in a tube; C during conditioning the bee ®rst scanned the tactile pattern with both antennae for approximately 3 s; D after scanning the pattern for 3 s proboscis extension was elicited by touching the antennae with 30% sucrose solution. Proboscis extension was rewarded with a small drop of sucrose solution; E 5 min after a conditioning trial the bee was tested by presenting the tactile pattern. Proboscis extension was recorded as a positive conditioned response
Tactile learning in the honeybee
  • Article
  • Full-text available

December 1998

·

550 Reads

·

89 Citations

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

J. Erber

·

S. Kierzek

·

E. Sander

·

K. Grandy

Free-flying bees were conditioned on a vertical wall to a vertical tactile pattern consisting of parallel lines of grooves and elevations. The asymptote of the learning curve is reached after approximately 25 rewards. Bees can discriminate the conditioned vertical pattern from a horizontal or diagonal alternative. Angle discrimination is apparent only for relatively coarse tactile cues. The proboscis extension response of fixed bees was used to condition bees to a vertical tactile pattern which was presented to the antennae. The learning curve reaches an asymptote after 4 rewards. After 7 unrewarded extinction trials the conditioned responses are reduced to 50%. Bees show best discrimination for patterns whose edges they can scan with their antennae. The animals show a high degree of generalization by responding to an object irrespective of the trained pattern. Under laboratory conditions fixed bees can discriminate the angles and spatial wavelengths of fine tactile patterns consisting of parallel grooves. Bees can also discriminate forms and sizes of tactile patterns. They do not discriminate between different types of edges and between positive and negative forms.

Download

Tactile motor learning in the antennal system of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)

January 1997

·

24 Reads

·

59 Citations

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

Honeybees fixed in small tubes scan an object within the range of the antennae by touching it briefly and frequently. In our experiments the animals were able to scan an object for several minutes with the antennae. After moving the object out of the range of the antennae, the animals showed antennal movements for several minutes that were correlated with the position of the removed object. These changes of antennal movements are called “behavioural plasticity” and are interpreted as a form of motor learning. Bees showed behavioural plasticity only for objects with relatively large surfaces. Plasticity was more pronounced in bees whose compound eyes were occluded. Behavioural plasticity was related to the duration of object presentation. Repeated presentations of the object increased the degree of plasticity. After presentation durations of 30 min the animals showed a significant increase of antennal positions related to the surface of the object and avoidance of areas corresponding to the edges. Behavioural plasticity was compared with reward-dependent learning by conditioning bees to objects. The results of motor learning and reward-dependent conditioning suggest that bees have tactile spatial memory.

Citations (2)


... Automated tracking techniques were first restricted to single points on the antennae (e.g. antennal tip tracking in 2D: Erber et al., 1997), then extended to marker-based tracking methods in 3D (e.g. Krause and D€ urr, 2004;Sch€ utz and D€ urr, 2011) and finally to marker-less tracking methods (e.g. ...

Reference:

Sensorimotor ecology of the insect antenna: Active sampling by a multimodal sensory organ
Tactile motor learning in the antennal system of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)
  • Citing Article
  • January 1997

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

... Mechanosensory stimuli have been previously used for conditioning protocols, elucidating honeybees' high capacity for tactile learning in both operant [29] and PER frameworks [30,31] wherein stimuli were in the form of objects held near to or touching the antennae. Our air flux stimulus is not only an interesting alternative conceptually but also offers several advantages. ...

Tactile learning in the honeybee

Journal of Comparative Physiology A