June Taylor’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1 Economy-wide (Excluding AFW) Stepwise and Fitted Marginal Cost Curve for Michigan, 2020
Table 1 GHG Mitigation Options of Michigan (All Sectors Excluding AFW), 2020
Table 1 . (continued)
Figure 2 Marginal Cost Curves of MGA Partners (All Sections Excluding AFW), 2020
Table 2 Economy-Wide (Excluding AFW) Emission Trading Simulation among MGA Partners in 2020: MGA Goal 20 Percent Below 2005 Levels, With Free Granting of Allowances (Million Dollars or Otherwise Specified)
Climate Change Policy Formation in Michigan The Case for Integrated Regional Policies
  • Article
  • Full-text available

59 Reads

·

1 Citation

·

·

Jeff Wennberg

·

[...]

·

June Taylor

Like most other states in the U.S., Michigan recently began addressing the problem of climate change. The Michigan initiative involves combining a stakeholder process and technical analyses to formulate a climate action plan. This paper reports on how regional scientists collaborating with facilitators of the policy-making process and state government decision-makers addressed two key aspects. First is the choice and design of policy instruments to use to implement greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation and sequestration. Second is the decision on whether the state should pursue its target for net GHG reduction on its own or in cooperation with other states. We summarize the results of applying a formal model for analyzing the implications of Authors' Note: The authors are, respectively, Research Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development (SPPD), University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA; Post-doctoral Research Associate, SPPD, (USC); Consultant to the Center for Climate Strategies (CCS); President and CEO of CCS. We would like to acknowledge the funding support of Faurecia, Inc., Roy A. Hunt Foundation, Kendeda Fund, Norman Founda-tion, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Sandler Family Foundation, and the Michigan Department of Environ-mental Quality. Legions of stakeholders and analysts contributed to the process and research described in this paper. We wish to offer special thanks to CCS team members:. Of course, any remaining errors and omissions are solely those of the authors. Moreover, the views expressed in this article represent those of the authors and not necessarily any of the institutions with which they are affiliated nor the institutions that funded the research.

Download

Citations (1)


... The basic data utilized for the regression analyses are taken from a set of macroeconomic analyses undertaken by the authors in conjunction with the Center for Climate Strategies 2 for the states of Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and New York. These state-based analyses evaluated the macroeconomic impacts of a comprehensive set of GHG emission mitigation options, the critical features of which were specifi ed in each respective state's CAP [14][15][16][17]. Appendix A presents the list of major GHG mitigation and sequestration policy options that are recommended in the CAPs in the four states. ...

Reference:

Development of Reduced-Form Models to Evaluate Macroeconomic Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Climate Change Policy Formation in Michigan The Case for Integrated Regional Policies